Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #86392
| From | Muttley@dastardlyhq.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: What is the good of new way of coding? |
| Date | 2022-09-17 16:13 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <tg4rnu$aeq$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tg4gi8$5qr0$1@dont-email.me> <tg4mrn$75v$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tg4p7j$6kku$1@dont-email.me> <tg4qtf$1ub0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <tg4r45$6q5f$1@dont-email.me> |
On Sat, 17 Sep 2022 18:03:37 +0200
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> wrote:
>Am 17.09.2022 um 17:59 schrieb Muttley@dastardlyhq.com:
>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2022 17:31:19 +0200
>> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Am 17.09.2022 um 16:50 schrieb Muttley@dastardlyhq.com:
>>>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2022 15:03:25 +0200
>>>> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Am 17.09.2022 um 14:46 schrieb wij:
>>>>>> I did not update my C++ understanding (probable since C++11) to find out
>I
>>>>>> cannot understand what the codes are about !!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- frorm https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.c++/c/2ebc6ifoPr4
>>>>>> #include <iostream>
>>>>>> #include <utility>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> using namespace std;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> int main()
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> auto pow = []<unsigned P>( double b, integral_constant<unsigned, P> )
>>>>>> -> double
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> auto unroll = [&]<size_t ... Indices>( index_sequence<Indices ...> )
>>>>>> -> double
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> return ((Indices, b) * ...);
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> if constexpr( P )
>>>>>> return unroll( make_index_sequence<P>() );
>>>>>> else
>>>>>> return b;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> cout << pow( 2.0, integral_constant<unsigned, 10'000>() ) << endl;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> ------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Question1: What would the code look like if using C++2006 for the above
>>>>> 'program'?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not possible to write that before C++20.
>>>>
>>>> Really? So it outputs some special assembler reserved for C++20 does it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, you can't unroll variable.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure the same functionality could be achieved in older C++ or
>> even C albeit with more lines of code.
>>
>
>Show me.
>
I don't have a c++ 20 compiler so I can't see what it does and I have better
things to do on a saturday than run it in my head.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What is the good of new way of coding? wij <wyniijj2@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 05:46 -0700
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 15:03 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-17 14:50 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 17:31 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-17 15:59 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 18:03 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-17 16:13 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 18:34 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 19:55 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 12:03 -0700
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-18 16:21 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-19 08:30 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-19 10:37 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-19 08:54 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-19 11:13 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 15:23 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 15:38 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Andreas Kempe <kempe@lysator.liu.se> - 2022-09-17 14:37 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 16:40 +0200
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Andreas Kempe <kempe@lysator.liu.se> - 2022-09-17 20:52 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-09-17 22:18 +0100
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-09-17 22:21 +0100
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Andreas Kempe <kempe@lysator.liu.se> - 2022-09-17 21:31 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-09-17 14:52 +0000
Re: What is the good of new way of coding? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-09-17 17:32 +0200
csiph-web