Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #71538

Re: is_standard_layout vs is_pod

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: is_standard_layout vs is_pod
Date Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:14:52 +0100
Lines 12
Message-ID <h8vqsdFiteaU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <856b47d8-fdfd-4167-9c01-587b59bafe7f@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net 4Ep1ejrv6ITRF+yG2nlB4gIpmr0gGuywaTir6cwz/HG4oVHOu+
Cancel-Lock sha1:q5zMMuw8u03+r745QU51yv/tD28=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1
In-Reply-To <856b47d8-fdfd-4167-9c01-587b59bafe7f@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language sv
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.c++:71538

Show key headers only | View raw


On 2020-01-24 at 07:17, Daniel wrote:
> Can someone explain what is the difference between is_standard_layout and is_pod, and why the latter is being deprecated in 2020?
> 

The is_pod tests several conditions that have been separated into 
is_standard_layout and is_trivial.

So, is_pod is no longer used by the standard library (except as the 
deprecated type trait).


     Bo Persson

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

is_standard_layout vs is_pod Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-01-23 22:17 -0800
  Re: is_standard_layout vs is_pod Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2020-01-24 10:14 +0100
  Re: is_standard_layout vs is_pod James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-01-25 00:07 -0500

csiph-web