Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: is_standard_layout vs is_pod
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:14:52 +0100
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <h8vqsdFiteaU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <856b47d8-fdfd-4167-9c01-587b59bafe7f@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 4Ep1ejrv6ITRF+yG2nlB4gIpmr0gGuywaTir6cwz/HG4oVHOu+
Cancel-Lock: sha1:q5zMMuw8u03+r745QU51yv/tD28=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1
In-Reply-To: <856b47d8-fdfd-4167-9c01-587b59bafe7f@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: sv
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:71538

On 2020-01-24 at 07:17, Daniel wrote:
> Can someone explain what is the difference between is_standard_layout and is_pod, and why the latter is being deprecated in 2020?
> 

The is_pod tests several conditions that have been separated into 
is_standard_layout and is_trivial.

So, is_pod is no longer used by the standard library (except as the 
deprecated type trait).


     Bo Persson