Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #47840
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework |
| Date | 2017-01-05 22:12 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <ed6h13F11foU6@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <a0695cca-5351-4a98-8549-576f399fc2d7@googlegroups.com> <slrno6qam0.5q5.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <o4jm15$th8$1@dont-email.me> <slrno6s247.5q5.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
On 01/ 5/17 09:49 PM, Jorgen Grahn wrote: > On Wed, 2017-01-04, Dombo wrote: >> Op 04-Jan-17 om 18:02 schreef Jorgen Grahn: > ... >>> I've used Google Test too, but I'm not very impressed. I remember them >>> making it hard to integrate with the build system, unless you choose >>> the build system /they/ like. >> >> I've been using the Google Test framework for a year now, and frankly I >> don't see what would make it hard to integrate it with a build system, >> or why it would prefer a particular build system. As far as I can tell >> it is pretty much build system agnostic. > > We (the project I was in) may have overlooked something ... as I > remember it, we ended up having to build it as part of the project, > rather than installing it as a library. And it wasn't very clear > /how/ to build it using Make; they shipped with CMake recipes. Usually projects just build gtest-all.cc :) -- Ian
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Suggestions for a unit test framework Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 09:13 -0800
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Cholo Lennon <chololennon@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-03 15:36 -0300
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 07:31 -0800
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> - 2017-01-03 19:41 +0100
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-01-04 17:02 +0000
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-05 08:37 +1300
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2017-01-04 21:34 +0100
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-01-05 08:49 +0000
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-05 22:12 +1300
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2017-01-05 20:22 +0000
csiph-web