Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #47828
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework |
| Date | 2017-01-05 08:37 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <ed5172FccfvU5@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <a0695cca-5351-4a98-8549-576f399fc2d7@googlegroups.com> <slrno6qam0.5q5.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
On 01/ 5/17 06:02 AM, Jorgen Grahn wrote: > On Tue, 2017-01-03, Daniel wrote: >> I'm currently using the boost unit test framework for a project that >> doesn't otherwise depend on boost. The features that I'm using are >> BOOST_REQUIRE, BOOST_CHECK, BOOST_REQUIRE_EXCEPTION, >> BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION, and checking that there are no memory leaks. >> >> It's proving too difficult if not impossible to set up continuous >> integration builds for all the environments and compilers supported >> that link to boost, so I'm looking for a self-contained replacement >> that can be included in the distribution. I looked at Catch >> https://github.com/philsquared/Catch, but it tries to be too clever, >> resulting in too many issues. >> >> Any suggestions? > > I'm always willing to plug my own: https://github.com/kjgrahn/orchis > But it's very minimal, and you can tell I don't like the official unit > test ideology very much. > > I've used Google Test too, but I'm not very impressed. I remember them > making it hard to integrate with the build system, unless you choose > the build system /they/ like. That's a non-issue these days. -- Ian
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Suggestions for a unit test framework Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 09:13 -0800
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Cholo Lennon <chololennon@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-03 15:36 -0300
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 07:31 -0800
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> - 2017-01-03 19:41 +0100
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-01-04 17:02 +0000
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-05 08:37 +1300
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2017-01-04 21:34 +0100
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2017-01-05 08:49 +0000
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-05 22:12 +1300
Re: Suggestions for a unit test framework legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2017-01-05 20:22 +0000
csiph-web