Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called?

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	"Gernot Frisch" <me@privacy.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called?
Date	Tue, 7 Feb 2012 10:32:32 +0100
Lines	15
Message-ID	<9pc9dhFh4pU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<jghp01$ak1$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net zgMGNFsZMMTAar8siBh9cAlq9eKYCzVd6uStov3GvhEjfqlrQ=
Cancel-Lock	sha1:3DIYTvScnqtGkZKpy0UIi5InqBo=
In-Reply-To	<jghp01$ak1$1@speranza.aioe.org>
X-Priority	3
X-MSMail-Priority	Normal
Importance	Normal
X-Newsreader	Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3538.513
X-MimeOLE	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3538.513
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:13813

Show key headers only | View raw

> in my case the destructor of a globally used class isn't called

I had lots of problems with global objects, because their c'tors are called 
even before the CRT was initialized and so on. Also, the memory leak tools 
usually don't get them right.

So, I switched from using global objects to somehting like:
object& global_object()
{
    static object o;
return o;
}

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "U.Mutlu" <for-usenet@mutluit.com> - 2012-02-04 00:01 +0100
  Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-04 12:05 +1300
    Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "U.Mutlu" <for-usenet@mutluit.com> - 2012-02-04 00:23 +0100
      Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-04 13:18 +1300
        Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2012-02-04 15:43 +0100
        Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-04 14:19 -0600
        Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-05 09:37 +1300
      Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 22:03 -0800
    Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 15:11 -0800
      Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-07 17:19 +1300
  Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get         called? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2012-02-03 17:28 -0600
  Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2012-02-03 18:22 -0600
  Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2012-02-04 15:46 +0100
  Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "Gernot Frisch" <me@privacy.net> - 2012-02-07 10:32 +0100

csiph-web