Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #13744
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? |
| Date | 2012-02-05 09:37 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <9p5j8qF4ajU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <jghp01$ak1$1@speranza.aioe.org> <9p37i4Fjr2U1@mid.individual.net> <4F2C6C7D.4020500@mutluit.com> <9p3breFjr2U2@mid.individual.net> <C++-20120204204129@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
On 02/ 5/12 08:41 AM, Stefan Ram wrote: > Ian Collins<ian-news@hotmail.com> writes: >>> A C++ conformance body should control the vendors. >> How? > > When a supplier sells a product under the name »C++ compiler«, > and this is not a C++ compiler, the customer might be entitled > to some compensation in some countries? Define "not a C++ compiler". Unlike Ada, there isn't a standard validation procedure for C++. If there was, C++ would probably have the same level of support and popularity as Ada. Producing a validated compiler is an extremely expensive process, as is producing the validation suite. -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "U.Mutlu" <for-usenet@mutluit.com> - 2012-02-04 00:01 +0100
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-04 12:05 +1300
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "U.Mutlu" <for-usenet@mutluit.com> - 2012-02-04 00:23 +0100
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-04 13:18 +1300
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2012-02-04 15:43 +0100
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-04 14:19 -0600
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-05 09:37 +1300
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 22:03 -0800
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 15:11 -0800
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-07 17:19 +1300
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2012-02-03 17:28 -0600
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2012-02-03 18:22 -0600
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2012-02-04 15:46 +0100
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "Gernot Frisch" <me@privacy.net> - 2012-02-07 10:32 +0100
csiph-web