Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #13744

Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called?

From Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called?
Date 2012-02-05 09:37 +1300
Message-ID <9p5j8qF4ajU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <jghp01$ak1$1@speranza.aioe.org> <9p37i4Fjr2U1@mid.individual.net> <4F2C6C7D.4020500@mutluit.com> <9p3breFjr2U2@mid.individual.net> <C++-20120204204129@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>

Show all headers | View raw


On 02/ 5/12 08:41 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Ian Collins<ian-news@hotmail.com>  writes:

>>> A C++ conformance body should control the vendors.
>> How?
>
>    When a supplier sells a product under the name »C++ compiler«,
>    and this is not a C++ compiler, the customer might be entitled
>    to some compensation in some countries?

Define "not a C++ compiler".

Unlike Ada, there isn't a standard validation procedure for C++.  If 
there was, C++ would probably have the same level of support and 
popularity as Ada.  Producing a validated compiler is an extremely 
expensive process, as is producing the validation suite.

-- 
Ian Collins

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "U.Mutlu" <for-usenet@mutluit.com> - 2012-02-04 00:01 +0100
  Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-04 12:05 +1300
    Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "U.Mutlu" <for-usenet@mutluit.com> - 2012-02-04 00:23 +0100
      Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-04 13:18 +1300
        Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2012-02-04 15:43 +0100
        Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-04 14:19 -0600
        Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-05 09:37 +1300
      Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 22:03 -0800
    Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 15:11 -0800
      Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-07 17:19 +1300
  Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get         called? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2012-02-03 17:28 -0600
  Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2012-02-03 18:22 -0600
  Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2012-02-04 15:46 +0100
  Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "Gernot Frisch" <me@privacy.net> - 2012-02-07 10:32 +0100

csiph-web