Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #13732
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? |
| Date | Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:18:54 +1300 |
| Lines | 27 |
| Message-ID | <9p3breFjr2U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <jghp01$ak1$1@speranza.aioe.org> <9p37i4Fjr2U1@mid.individual.net> <4F2C6C7D.4020500@mutluit.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net pMeNKKlDfKhUdiNw3BmjPQGfq4o6bPyYLtt1toAkACEeHQOlFb |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:SUwmLk/f65ADA47egoSucfd8CMk= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/6.0.2 |
| In-Reply-To | <4F2C6C7D.4020500@mutluit.com> |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:13732 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 02/ 4/12 12:23 PM, U.Mutlu wrote: > Ian Collins wrote, On 02/04/12 00:05: >> On 02/ 4/12 12:01 PM, U.Mutlu wrote: >> >>> How can Microsoft sell such a buggy product and call it "C++ compiler"? >> >> Show me a bug free compiler and I'll show you a flying pig. > > But if such elemantary parts like automatically called destructors > aren't working in a C++ compiler, then it can't be a C++ compiler. Like any piece of commercial software, the bugs that get fixed are either the most embarrassing ones, or the ones the most paying customers prioritise. There's no point in whinging about something you got for free, get a support contract and raise a bug. > Imagine what happens if that product is used in sensitive areas > like the NASA, airplane industry, defense companies etc. etc... I doubt anyone runs windows in safety critical systems :) > A C++ conformance body should control the vendors. How? -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "U.Mutlu" <for-usenet@mutluit.com> - 2012-02-04 00:01 +0100
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-04 12:05 +1300
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "U.Mutlu" <for-usenet@mutluit.com> - 2012-02-04 00:23 +0100
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-04 13:18 +1300
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2012-02-04 15:43 +0100
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-04 14:19 -0600
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-05 09:37 +1300
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 22:03 -0800
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 15:11 -0800
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-07 17:19 +1300
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2012-02-03 17:28 -0600
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2012-02-03 18:22 -0600
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2012-02-04 15:46 +0100
Re: What would happen if your destructors aren't get called? "Gernot Frisch" <me@privacy.net> - 2012-02-07 10:32 +0100
csiph-web