Re: Oozing poison

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.wtal.de!news.tal.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: Oozing poison
Date	Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:56:31 +1300
Lines	27
Message-ID	<9ob53fFte0U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<ee928a54-720f-4beb-bdd3-2f1f112f0036@24g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <R-qdnblKoaRhy5HSnZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@giganews.com> <2f356856-3e59-442f-b711-bde8e13d8beb@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com> <slrnjgrfdu.1ls.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <9038aa7f-e263-4309-a67e-f70d2caafe26@t8g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <jemtb3$m61$1@dont-email.me> <9563593d-8d88-49a8-b390-e07b77d27faa@v14g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <buovco962ap.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com> <b9623f6e-c592-4557-9b75-d225cfab579d@n6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <4f1b85d7$0$24603$c3e8da3$e408f015@news.astraweb.com> <slrnjhr0nq.1ls.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <4f1f7b98$0$28282$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net rSaw7UpRz2qnIIkeFQ656QhRYOmEGWusEbJdbR3Qws3R1WclO3
Cancel-Lock	sha1:QH8rvqWWblksv69a87HzHQSGyTM=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/6.0.2
In-Reply-To	<4f1f7b98$0$28282$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com>
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:13586

Show key headers only | View raw

On 01/25/12 04:48 PM, Pavel wrote:
> Jorgen Grahn wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-01-22, Pavel wrote:
>> ...
>>> I guess, everyone's mileage varies. For a change, I am on AD side in this
>>> C-vs-C++ maintenance/reviewing issue although for different reasons. Reading C++
>>> code takes, in my experience, much longer time than C code of equivalent
>>> complexity because there are on average more (commonly used) meanings for
>>> identically-looking C++ code than C code. I have already given on this group an
>>> example that, in C, you pretty much know that f(a) does not change a -- but not
>>> in C++.
>>
>> I don't see the problem. You review f(A&), and immediately see that it
>> can modify its apparent argument. So you ask yourself "will this be
>> obvious in the calling code, based on the name of f and so on?" If the
>> answer is "no", you fail the code.

> Even letting alone that failing all such code you encounter prevents you from
> staying on schedule:

It sounds to me like you have a process problem rather than a language 
one.  I don't thank anyone can do a thorough job of reviewing anything 
other than small sections of unfamiliar code without the involvement of 
the authour or someone else familiar with the code.

-- 
Ian Collins

Thread

Oozing poison AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2012-01-10 04:35 -0800
  Re: Oozing poison Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-01-10 15:19 +0000
    Re: Oozing poison AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2012-01-11 00:43 -0800
      Re: Oozing poison "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2012-01-11 10:01 +0100
        Re: Oozing poison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-11 22:09 +1300
          Re: Oozing poison AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2012-01-11 01:42 -0800
            Re: Oozing poison Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-01-11 13:36 +0000
              Re: Oozing poison John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> - 2012-01-11 10:08 -0600
              Re: Oozing poison AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2012-01-12 06:08 -0800
                Re: Oozing poison Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-01-12 14:13 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2012-01-17 02:08 -0800
                Re: Oozing poison Henrik Faber <hfaber@invalid.net> - 2012-01-17 12:50 +0100
                Re: Oozing poison Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-13 02:18 -0800
                Re: Oozing poison AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2012-01-17 02:24 -0800
      Re: Oozing poison Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-01-11 16:50 +0000
        Re: Oozing poison AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2012-01-12 06:04 -0800
          Re: Oozing poison Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-01-12 10:13 -0500
            Re: Oozing poison AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2012-01-17 02:19 -0800
              Re: Oozing poison Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-01-17 08:04 -0500
              Re: Oozing poison Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2012-01-18 13:51 +0900
                Re: Oozing poison AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2012-01-21 04:40 -0800
                Re: Oozing poison Quint Rankid <qbr567@gmail.com> - 2012-01-21 09:05 -0800
                Re: Oozing poison Wil Evers <bouncer@dev.null> - 2012-01-21 18:52 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Quint Rankid <qbr567@gmail.com> - 2012-01-21 11:33 -0800
                Re: Oozing poison AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2012-01-25 02:23 -0800
                Re: Oozing poison AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2012-01-25 02:07 -0800
                Re: Oozing poison Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-01-25 07:59 -0500
                Re: Oozing poison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-26 07:54 +1300
                Re: Oozing poison Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2012-01-21 22:43 -0500
                Re: Oozing poison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-22 21:05 +1300
                Re: Oozing poison Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2012-01-22 18:21 -0500
                Re: Oozing poison Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-01-23 15:55 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-23 08:37 -0800
                Re: Oozing poison Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2012-01-24 22:48 -0500
                Re: Oozing poison Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-01-25 19:44 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-26 08:56 +1300
                Re: Oozing poison 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-25 23:04 -0800
                Re: Oozing poison Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-26 03:24 -0800
                Re: Oozing poison scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-01-26 19:13 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Brian Drummond <brian@shapes.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-27 00:12 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-26 22:44 -0600
                Re: Oozing poison 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-28 14:25 -0800
                Re: Oozing poison Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2012-02-26 22:16 -0600
              Re: Oozing poison "Gernot Frisch" <me@privacy.net> - 2012-01-24 18:21 +0100
                Re: Oozing poison Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-01-24 12:41 -0500
                Re: Oozing poison Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-26 03:25 -0800
              Re: Oozing poison Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-25 19:44 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-01-26 09:44 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-26 10:36 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-01-26 19:18 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-01-26 20:42 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-01-26 16:30 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-01-26 19:24 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Cholo Lennon <chololennon@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-26 17:13 -0300
                Re: Oozing poison scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-01-26 20:55 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-01-26 22:08 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-01-27 00:32 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2012-01-28 12:59 +0100
                Re: Oozing poison Cholo Lennon <chololennon@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-27 18:28 -0300
                Re: Oozing poison Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-01-29 18:02 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-27 20:18 +1300
                Re: Oozing poison Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2012-01-27 18:09 +0900
                Re: Oozing poison scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-01-27 20:29 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-28 10:06 +1300
                Re: Oozing poison scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-01-27 21:26 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-28 12:22 +1300
                Re: Oozing poison scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-01-28 04:18 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2012-01-28 13:44 +0900
                Re: Oozing poison scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-01-28 21:31 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-29 11:32 +1300
                Re: Oozing poison 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-28 14:55 -0800
                Re: Oozing poison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-29 11:59 +1300
                Re: Oozing poison scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-01-30 17:08 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-28 18:06 +1300
                Re: Oozing poison scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-01-28 22:49 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-29 12:22 +1300
                Re: Oozing poison scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-01-27 20:16 +0000
                Re: Oozing poison Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-28 10:01 +1300
                Re: Oozing poison Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-01-28 16:00 +0000
  Re: Oozing poison Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-01-10 21:42 +0000
    Re: Oozing poison AD <isquat@gmail.com> - 2012-01-17 02:31 -0800

csiph-web