Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #8964

Re: maximum cases in a switch ?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: maximum cases in a switch ?
Date Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:02:22 +1200
Lines 37
Message-ID <9b0eoeFlvbU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <j1rlqg$k02$1@dont-email.me> <4e415d1c$0$18798$cc2e38e6@news.uslec.net> <j1rqfi$l6c$1@dont-email.me> <Xns9F3D5912E1A36jgreerdoubletakecom@88.198.244.100> <j1tvu8$lu6$1@dont-email.me> <Xns9F3E59BF6EBC4jgreerdoubletakecom@88.198.244.100> <j20tlv$una$1@dont-email.me> <Xns9F3F635C0B26Ajgreerdoubletakecom@88.198.244.100> <j23ilq$3ro$1@dont-email.me> <Xns9F3FA69F387ADjgreerdoubletakecom@88.198.244.100> <j2eq99$7jo$2@dont-email.me> <9b09agFgq5U9@mid.individual.net> <j2euu2$aci$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace individual.net SeRxpqAE9ieWZAqsMuLqEQHfqbRz/CgCXU+gIZyzMnzdYiCmw0
Cancel-Lock sha1:7Mypq860mkz9aTF1aVtLr9Ophyk=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20101021 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4
In-Reply-To <j2euu2$aci$1@dont-email.me>
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:8964

Show key headers only | View raw

On 08/17/11 11:37 AM, Leo Equinox Gaspard wrote:
> Le 17/08/2011 00:29, Ian Collins a écrit :
>> On 08/17/11 10:18 AM, Leo Equinox Gaspard wrote:
>>>
>>> I already answered, but it looks like there had been a
>>> misunderstanding, so,
>>> in order to be nice, I will re-post with removing the useless parts.
>>>
>>> AFAIK a POD may have special behavior.
>>>
>>> I just checked the latest free paper about C++0x, and I saw this.
>>
>> Check 9 pp4 in the 2003 standard and the third example in 9 pp10 in the
>> new one.
>>
>
> Oh, I answered your first message without understanding that you were
> speaking of the 2003 standard.
> However, I think third example of 9pp10 implies the destructor's body,
> not shown here, is doing something.
>
> And I apologize for my message saying 9.6 in place of 9pp6.
>
> The standard's text is never mentioning the absence of destructors, but
> only the triviality of destructors.
>

The wording has changed in the new standard, introducing trivial 
destructors.  The 2003 version is clearer:

"A POD-struct is an aggregate class that has no non-static data members 
of type non-POD-struct, non-POD-union (or array of such types) or 
reference, and has no user-defined copy assignment operator and no 
user-defined destructor."

-- 
Ian Collins

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-09 11:03 -0500
  Re: maximum cases in a switch ? LR <lruss@superlink.net> - 2011-08-09 12:27 -0400
    Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-09 12:23 -0500
      Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joe Greer <jgreer@doubletake.com> - 2011-08-10 12:45 +0000
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-10 09:09 -0400
          Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joe Greer <jgreer@doubletake.com> - 2011-08-11 12:49 +0000
            Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-11 10:48 -0500
              Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-08-11 18:26 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-11 11:45 -0500
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-08-11 20:06 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-11 14:47 -0500
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-08-11 22:32 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-08-12 06:00 -0700
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-12 10:49 -0500
              Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joe Greer <jgreer@doubletake.com> - 2011-08-12 13:46 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-12 10:58 -0500
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joe Greer <jgreer@doubletake.com> - 2011-08-12 20:22 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-12 15:57 -0500
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 20:58 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-13 18:16 -0400
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-16 07:55 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-16 09:04 -0400
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 00:11 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 10:24 +1200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 01:33 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 00:18 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 10:29 +1200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 01:37 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 12:02 +1200
  Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-09 16:38 +0000
  Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-09 15:42 -0400
    Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-09 15:39 -0500
      Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leo Equinox Gaspard <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-08-09 23:39 +0200
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-09 17:18 -0500
      Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-09 20:06 -0400
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-10 06:54 +0000
          Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-10 12:20 +0000
            Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-10 11:34 -0500
              Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Paul Brettschneider <paul.brettschneider@yahoo.fr> - 2011-08-10 20:34 +0200
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Paul Brettschneider <paul.brettschneider@yahoo.fr> - 2011-08-10 21:06 +0200
              Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-08-11 21:00 +0000
      Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-08-10 11:10 +0200
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-10 10:40 +0000
          Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-10 09:02 -0400
            Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-11 08:05 +0000
          Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> - 2011-08-10 21:17 +0200
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-08-10 11:12 -0500
          Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-11 11:07 +0100
            Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-13 00:14 +0100
              Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-13 14:54 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-13 15:26 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-14 18:14 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 01:09 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-15 02:15 -0700
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 12:18 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 13:22 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 13:38 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 14:06 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 16:05 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 16:20 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 20:24 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 22:09 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 22:19 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 03:10 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:08 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 14:01 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 14:10 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 03:07 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:05 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:57 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 14:07 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:29 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:35 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 00:01 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 00:11 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 01:23 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-15 13:32 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 15:20 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-15 15:33 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-16 07:34 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 13:49 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-16 15:02 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 16:07 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:50 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:57 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 00:12 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-16 19:34 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-17 12:55 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 14:32 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-17 20:11 +0000
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-18 11:00 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-08-15 15:35 -0700
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 06:34 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 12:23 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-17 02:01 -0700
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 12:29 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 14:13 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 14:18 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 14:43 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 15:23 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 15:31 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 15:48 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 15:53 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? SG <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-08-17 07:54 -0700
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 20:40 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net> - 2011-08-17 10:54 -0500
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-17 12:44 -0500
                jump table vs. vector of function pointers(was Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net> - 2011-08-17 15:18 -0500
                Re: jump table vs. vector of function pointers(was Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-08-17 22:48 +0200
                Re: jump table vs. vector of function pointers(was Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net> - 2011-08-17 16:49 -0500
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> - 2011-08-17 13:50 -0400
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-17 22:04 +0100
                Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-22 03:23 -0700
    Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-12 05:51 -0700
      Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-13 08:45 -0400
    Re: maximum cases in a switch ? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-21 16:55 -0700
      Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-21 23:22 -0500
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-22 08:14 -0400
        Re: maximum cases in a switch ? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-22 10:56 -0700

csiph-web