Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #7400
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: lvalue required as increment operand -- why does the Standard requires this for fundamental types only? |
| Date | Sun, 03 Jul 2011 22:16:30 +1200 |
| Lines | 10 |
| Message-ID | <97att3FnfiU14@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <8c46e824-7240-4615-98ea-560433d705b8@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net QO1F1YjixdGJEdPwk7rjVQgoO+AXTRDQyKQ5AsrGn4yArbEqZG |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:hTr7NSts7SETKk9cCVSxQXmUP8Q= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20101021 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 |
| In-Reply-To | <8c46e824-7240-4615-98ea-560433d705b8@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:7400 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 07/ 3/11 10:12 PM, Leo "Equinox" Gaspard wrote: > I'm sorry, but I just can't. > > My FAI's news server doesn't have comp.(lang|std).c++, so if I try to post to those, I can only by Google Groups. > And I don't know any other free NNTP server. Use Google Groups, just don't use the sociopathic "new" interface. -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re : Re: Re : Re: lvalue required as increment operand -- why does the Standard requires this for fundamental types only? "Leo \"Equinox\" Gaspard" <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-07-03 03:12 -0700 Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: lvalue required as increment operand -- why does the Standard requires this for fundamental types only? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-03 22:16 +1200 Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: lvalue required as increment operand -- why does the Standard requires this for fundamental types only? James Lothian <james@firstnamelastname.freeserve.co.uk> - 2011-07-03 13:15 +0100
csiph-web