Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #7400

Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: lvalue required as increment operand -- why does the Standard requires this for fundamental types only?

From Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: lvalue required as increment operand -- why does the Standard requires this for fundamental types only?
Date 2011-07-03 22:16 +1200
Message-ID <97att3FnfiU14@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <8c46e824-7240-4615-98ea-560433d705b8@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/ 3/11 10:12 PM, Leo "Equinox" Gaspard wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I just can't.
>
> My FAI's news server doesn't have comp.(lang|std).c++, so if I try to post to those, I can only by Google Groups.
> And I don't know any other free NNTP server.

Use Google Groups, just don't use the sociopathic "new" interface.

-- 
Ian Collins

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re : Re: Re : Re: lvalue required as increment operand -- why does the Standard requires this for fundamental types only? "Leo \"Equinox\" Gaspard" <ekinox1995@gmail.com> - 2011-07-03 03:12 -0700
  Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: lvalue required as increment operand -- why does the Standard requires this for fundamental types only? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-03 22:16 +1200
  Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: lvalue required as increment operand -- why does the Standard requires this for fundamental types only? James Lothian <james@firstnamelastname.freeserve.co.uk> - 2011-07-03 13:15 +0100

csiph-web