Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #122788
| From | Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory, comp.lang.c++, comp.lang.c, comp.ai.philosophy |
| Subject | Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem |
| Followup-To | comp.theory |
| Date | 2025-09-28 12:52 +1000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87seg71e79.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <10b6h4c$13hh3$4@dont-email.me> <10b6hqn$164mh$1@dont-email.me> <20250926121612.571@kylheku.com> <10b6qp0$18q7n$1@dont-email.me> <20250926130112.166@kylheku.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.theory
Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes: > A contradiction is a piece of foreign material in a formal system. It > is nonsensical to bring it in, and assert it as a truth; it makes no > sense to do so. Once you do, it creates contagion. As an aside, the field of paraconsistent logic, which excludes the PoE, tries to study and develop 'inconsistency-tolerant' formal systems: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraconsistent_logic > The entailment relations of paraconsistent logics are propositionally > weaker than classical logic; that is, they deem fewer propositional > inferences valid. The point is that a paraconsistent logic can never > be a propositional extension of classical logic, that is, > propositionally validate every entailment that classical logic > does. In some sense, then, paraconsistent logic is more conservative > or cautious than classical logic. It is due to such conservativeness > that paraconsistent languages can be more expressive than their > classical counterparts including the hierarchy of metalanguages due to > Alfred Tarski and others. Alexis.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-09-25 08:56 -0500
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-09-25 16:21 +0200
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-09-25 09:27 -0500
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-09-25 16:19 +0100
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-09-25 13:18 -0700
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-09-26 20:25 +0100
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-09-26 13:00 -0700
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-09-27 02:18 -0500
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-09-26 12:17 -0500
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-09-26 16:09 -0500
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-09-26 22:15 +0000
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-09-26 19:28 +0000
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2025-09-26 14:00 -0600
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-09-26 17:22 -0500
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-09-26 19:49 -0700
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-09-27 12:59 +0200
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-09-27 10:47 -0500
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-09-26 20:35 +0000
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> - 2025-09-28 12:52 +1000
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-09-26 14:49 -0500
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-09-26 19:01 +0100
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-09-26 13:10 -0500
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-09-26 10:56 -0500
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-09-27 20:32 +0200
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-09-27 13:56 -0500
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-09-26 18:05 +0100
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-09-26 11:22 -0500
Re: I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-09-26 17:44 +0200
Expanding on Rice's Theorem olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-09-29 21:35 -0500
I corrected the very subtle error in the halting problem --- ALL DETAILS PROVIDED olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-10-01 08:10 -0500
csiph-web