Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #6649
| From | Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. |
| Date | 2011-06-12 10:28 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87fwnfmp1z.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <4DF1FFED.FB7C5904@web.de> <95fcjmFo70U2@mid.individual.net> <1a65aaa8-f711-4018-81c9-d3379f17ee78@j25g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> <87pqmk2g00.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <b1594903-5b33-4b53-896b-6b9d5d4a5132@r2g2000vbj.googlegroups.com> |
* Keith H. Duggar: > On Jun 11, 5:51 pm, Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> wrote: >> * Keith H. Duggar: >> >> > Yes, it's a rising sense of entitlement. The self-centered ignorant >> > masses expect others to work for them for free. >> >> Doesn't the C++ standardization committee work for free for the >> relevant national standardization bodies and ISO? > > No. ISO provides infrastructure, maintenance, servicing, etc (in > other words they perform work) in exchange for membership fees, > publishing rights, technical contribution, etc from the members. > ISO currently receives roughly 35% of it's revenue from sales > and service. So clearly 1) sales are an important revenue stream > for them 2) they are providing economically valuable work. This wasn't my question. Clearly, ISO spends membership fees on something. > In any case, what does volunteer work and/or mutual agreement have > to do with Alexander demanding the work of /others/ for free? ISO > has something Alexander wants. ISO asks for compensation in return > for giving him what he wants. If they mutually agree to the terms > then a transaction can happen. If they don't it doesn't. Economics > (and life for that matter) does not get any simpler than that. ISO didn't compensate the authors and editors, either. A bit like the major record label who makes quite a few bucks by selling an album by some minor band, and curiously, none of it actually ends up at the band. Perhaps this analogy explains why the situation is a bit puzzling. On the other hand, it is structurally similar to complaining about the overpriced nature of Apple hardware---without the brand and the price tag, there would be no Apple product at all.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-06-10 12:05 +0200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-06-10 03:35 -0700
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-06-10 13:28 +0200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-06-10 05:07 -0700
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-06-10 14:32 +0200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-06-10 07:24 -0700
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-06-10 16:50 +0200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> - 2011-06-10 14:21 +0200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-06-10 14:34 +0200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2011-06-11 23:56 +0200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-11 08:20 +1200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Keith H Duggar <duggar@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-06-10 20:33 -0700
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-06-11 12:59 +0200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2011-06-11 23:51 +0200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Keith H Duggar <duggar@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-06-11 15:32 -0700
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2011-06-12 10:28 +0200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Keith H Duggar <duggar@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-06-12 08:02 -0700
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-06-11 12:53 +0200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-11 23:30 +1200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-06-11 13:55 +0200
Re: Latest draft of C++ 11 Organization: Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2011-06-11 23:44 +0200
csiph-web