Re: Can anyone improve this ?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: Can anyone improve this ?
Date	Mon, 17 Jan 2022 22:43:04 -0800
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	14
Message-ID	<86sftlr1c7.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink)
References	<srjdtm$d9c$1@dont-email.me> <86ee56rzbz.fsf@linuxsc.com> <ss4ksr$d9d$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info	reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d40b94b342f96ad99b493372f9984bf0"; logging-data="12270"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18enAr+FtZMncrOuBoQAPT8e4O+MIaMrTA="
User-Agent	Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:ubPUlN8tVBQGSc95JwJMKJeNPeY= sha1:LtdQImLD0R4UZiRnM5y6kYbG76A=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.c++:82815

Show key headers only | View raw

"Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> writes:

> On 17 Jan 2022 19:28, Tim Rentsch wrote:
>
>> (Note:  the cases() macro produces one 'case X:' for each
>> argument X except the last one where the ':' is omitted,
>> written using the standard C preprocessor, and left as an
>> exercise for any ambitious readers.)
>
> Exercise for you:  test that unrevealed macro with Visual C++.

Update after my previous message.  The cases() macro I wrote has
now been tested with Visual C++, and it compiles there without
complaint.

Thread

Can anyone improve this ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-11 09:08 +0100
  Re: Can anyone improve this ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-11 09:50 +0000
    Re: Can anyone improve this ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-01-11 11:07 +0000
    Re: Can anyone improve this ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-01-11 11:08 +0000
    Re: Can anyone improve this ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-11 18:28 +0100
      Re: Can anyone improve this ? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2022-01-11 18:41 +0100
        Re: Can anyone improve this ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-11 19:36 +0100
      Re: Can anyone improve this ? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-01-11 21:54 -0800
  Re: Can anyone improve this ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-11 21:51 +0100
    Re: Can anyone improve this ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-12 14:19 +0100
    Re: Can anyone improve this ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-12 14:20 +0100
      Re: Can anyone improve this ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-01-12 14:14 +0000
        Re: Can anyone improve this ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-12 17:20 +0100
          Re: Can anyone improve this ? "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-01-12 08:38 -0800
          Re: Can anyone improve this ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-01-12 16:55 +0000
        Re: Can anyone improve this ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-16 12:09 -0800
        Re: Can anyone improve this ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-16 12:12 -0800
          Re: Can anyone improve this ? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-01-16 13:00 -0800
            Re: Can anyone improve this ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-17 10:13 -0800
  Re: Can anyone improve this ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-17 10:28 -0800
    Re: Can anyone improve this ? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-01-17 21:51 +0100
      Re: Can anyone improve this ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-17 16:16 -0800
      Re: Can anyone improve this ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-01-17 22:43 -0800
        Re: Can anyone improve this ? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-01-18 12:09 +0100
    Re: Can anyone improve this ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-01-18 09:18 +0100

csiph-web