Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Can anyone improve this ?
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 22:43:04 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <86sftlr1c7.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <srjdtm$d9c$1@dont-email.me> <86ee56rzbz.fsf@linuxsc.com> <ss4ksr$d9d$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d40b94b342f96ad99b493372f9984bf0"; logging-data="12270"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18enAr+FtZMncrOuBoQAPT8e4O+MIaMrTA="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ubPUlN8tVBQGSc95JwJMKJeNPeY= sha1:LtdQImLD0R4UZiRnM5y6kYbG76A=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:82815

"Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> writes:

> On 17 Jan 2022 19:28, Tim Rentsch wrote:
>
>> (Note:  the cases() macro produces one 'case X:' for each
>> argument X except the last one where the ':' is omitted,
>> written using the standard C preprocessor, and left as an
>> exercise for any ambitious readers.)
>
> Exercise for you:  test that unrevealed macro with Visual C++.

Update after my previous message.  The cases() macro I wrote has
now been tested with Visual C++, and it compiles there without
complaint.