Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #79713
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint |
| Date | 2021-05-22 07:49 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86k0nqesce.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <7898175c-0606-4961-b592-930011b302b9n@googlegroups.com> <s8an8g$h0g$1@dont-email.me> <5965de44-3a81-4c98-be20-d9357e200c37n@googlegroups.com> <s8aufi$lh0$1@dont-email.me> <55f40253-5975-4b40-b529-be2d767c98d9n@googlegroups.com> |
Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> writes: > On Saturday, 22 May 2021 at 15:46:58 UTC+3, Bonita Montero wrote: > >>> I wrote "Even if implementation ignores that hint there is slight >>> performance potential as it returns only iterator not >>> pair<iterator,bool> like emplace. " >> >> Yes, and I've shown that the difference is just an move-instruction. >> And this is the same difference when passing hint. >> >>> You groundlessly claimed that passing (allegedly unused) iterator >>> there somehow outweights that advantage. >> >> Yes, because this is a identical move. >> >>> How I am arrogant and stupid? ... >> >> Yes, ultra-stupid. > > All your life you are doomed to claim groundless garbage and > then to run from discussions with pathetic insults. Does it feel > good? Which brings up the question, why then do you bother responding? Or even reading the posts to begin with?
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-21 16:08 +0200
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-05-21 12:59 -0700
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-21 14:29 -0700
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-22 08:14 +0200
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-22 11:23 +0200
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-22 03:32 -0700
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-22 12:43 +0200
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-22 05:11 -0700
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-22 14:46 +0200
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-22 05:57 -0700
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-05-22 07:49 -0700
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-22 08:23 -0700
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-22 15:04 +0200
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-22 06:51 -0700
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-22 02:11 -0700
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-05-22 05:28 -0700
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-22 05:54 -0700
Re: std::unordered_map<Key,T,Hash,KeyEqual,Allocator>::emplace_hint Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-22 15:06 +0200
csiph-web