Path: csiph.com!goblin2!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: std::unordered_map::emplace_hint Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 07:49:37 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <86k0nqesce.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <0239aad6-a183-46a0-9033-5fd08caccab8n@googlegroups.com> <7898175c-0606-4961-b592-930011b302b9n@googlegroups.com> <5965de44-3a81-4c98-be20-d9357e200c37n@googlegroups.com> <55f40253-5975-4b40-b529-be2d767c98d9n@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7f88e125b7b27a470ef723ae27ca2d53"; logging-data="25942"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19JqLTBIYTBSj1l1z1wZiBeMxWBm7717aY=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZHJZoXCkCLzC1eGzqKtj8TdrzlI= sha1:5mZ1zhTVYUpOyI+gomh7QAurQWc= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:79713 Tiib writes: > On Saturday, 22 May 2021 at 15:46:58 UTC+3, Bonita Montero wrote: > >>> I wrote "Even if implementation ignores that hint there is slight >>> performance potential as it returns only iterator not >>> pair like emplace. " >> >> Yes, and I've shown that the difference is just an move-instruction. >> And this is the same difference when passing hint. >> >>> You groundlessly claimed that passing (allegedly unused) iterator >>> there somehow outweights that advantage. >> >> Yes, because this is a identical move. >> >>> How I am arrogant and stupid? ... >> >> Yes, ultra-stupid. > > All your life you are doomed to claim groundless garbage and > then to run from discussions with pathetic insults. Does it feel > good? Which brings up the question, why then do you bother responding? Or even reading the posts to begin with?