Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.dcom.telecom > #14140 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "The Telecom Digest" <submissions@telecom-digest.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-05-18 13:16 -0400 |
| Last post | 2023-05-18 13:16 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.dcom.telecom
Five More California Federal Court Decisions Rule Against Plaintiffs In Chat Wiretap Cases [telecom] "The Telecom Digest" <submissions@telecom-digest.org> - 2023-05-18 13:16 -0400
| From | "The Telecom Digest" <submissions@telecom-digest.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-05-18 13:16 -0400 |
| Subject | Five More California Federal Court Decisions Rule Against Plaintiffs In Chat Wiretap Cases [telecom] |
| Message-ID | <20230518171648.GA319321@telecomdigest.us> |
by J. Colin Knisely , Michael Zullo and Katherine Lynch Companies that offer chat features on their websites should take note of five recent federal decisions out of California dismissing California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) claims relating to the use of chat features. These decisions, from the Northern, Eastern and Central District Courts, represent the latest entries to the jurisprudence and clarify the growing majority view that: 1. The "party exception" remains a viable defense even when companies use a third party to provide the chat services at issue; and 2. Plaintiffs must provide more than boilerplate, conclusory statements to plausibly allege "eavesdropping" and data use by a vendor to survive a motion to dismiss. https://www.mondaq.com/article/news/1314432?q=1803232&n=789&tp=10&tlk=15&lk=84
Back to top | Article view | comp.dcom.telecom
csiph-web