Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.dcom.telecom > #14140 > unrolled thread

Five More California Federal Court Decisions Rule Against Plaintiffs In Chat Wiretap Cases [telecom]

Started by"The Telecom Digest" <submissions@telecom-digest.org>
First post2023-05-18 13:16 -0400
Last post2023-05-18 13:16 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.dcom.telecom


Contents

  Five More California Federal Court Decisions Rule Against Plaintiffs  In Chat Wiretap Cases [telecom] "The Telecom Digest" <submissions@telecom-digest.org> - 2023-05-18 13:16 -0400

#14140 — Five More California Federal Court Decisions Rule Against Plaintiffs In Chat Wiretap Cases [telecom]

From"The Telecom Digest" <submissions@telecom-digest.org>
Date2023-05-18 13:16 -0400
SubjectFive More California Federal Court Decisions Rule Against Plaintiffs In Chat Wiretap Cases [telecom]
Message-ID<20230518171648.GA319321@telecomdigest.us>
by J. Colin Knisely , Michael Zullo and Katherine Lynch

Companies that offer chat features on their websites should take note
of five recent federal decisions out of California dismissing
California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) claims relating to the use
of chat features. These decisions, from the Northern, Eastern and
Central District Courts, represent the latest entries to the
jurisprudence and clarify the growing majority view that:

1. The "party exception" remains a viable defense even when companies
   use a third party to provide the chat services at issue; and

2. Plaintiffs must provide more than boilerplate, conclusory
   statements to plausibly allege "eavesdropping" and data use by a
   vendor to survive a motion to dismiss.

https://www.mondaq.com/article/news/1314432?q=1803232&n=789&tp=10&tlk=15&lk=84

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.dcom.telecom


csiph-web