Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.dcom.telecom > #14140
| From | "The Telecom Digest" <submissions@telecom-digest.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.dcom.telecom |
| Subject | Five More California Federal Court Decisions Rule Against Plaintiffs In Chat Wiretap Cases [telecom] |
| Date | 2023-05-18 13:16 -0400 |
| Organization | The Telecom Digest |
| Message-ID | <20230518171648.GA319321@telecomdigest.us> (permalink) |
by J. Colin Knisely , Michael Zullo and Katherine Lynch Companies that offer chat features on their websites should take note of five recent federal decisions out of California dismissing California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) claims relating to the use of chat features. These decisions, from the Northern, Eastern and Central District Courts, represent the latest entries to the jurisprudence and clarify the growing majority view that: 1. The "party exception" remains a viable defense even when companies use a third party to provide the chat services at issue; and 2. Plaintiffs must provide more than boilerplate, conclusory statements to plausibly allege "eavesdropping" and data use by a vendor to survive a motion to dismiss. https://www.mondaq.com/article/news/1314432?q=1803232&n=789&tp=10&tlk=15&lk=84
Back to comp.dcom.telecom | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Five More California Federal Court Decisions Rule Against Plaintiffs In Chat Wiretap Cases [telecom] "The Telecom Digest" <submissions@telecom-digest.org> - 2023-05-18 13:16 -0400
csiph-web