Groups > comp.databases.ms-access > #9173

Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	"Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.databases.ms-access
Subject	Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition?
Date	Thu, 20 Mar 2014 01:17:33 -0500
Lines	43
Message-ID	<bovffqFuga5U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<0no8i918k7aufao806intvft1mhrku3bt3@4ax.com> <bokindFl3pqU1@mid.individual.net> <8inbi9pm954t073b47l0qhtle9lajkc6ir@4ax.com> <bopnleFo3msU1@mid.individual.net> <boq5dbFqhukU1@mid.individual.net> <kt9ki9d01gj143ru8f6o7ub9dalq983tkp@4ax.com>
X-Trace	individual.net zU8M5xnNW7lRlgk7RvZ1EgJTblN1x1IZtwXS400QAcPTQbH17Q
Cancel-Lock	sha1:9dOq1SACH1YeAql1r7Vk3WK+nB8=
X-Priority	3
X-MSMail-Priority	Normal
X-Newsreader	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-RFC2646	Format=Flowed; Original
Xref	csiph.com comp.databases.ms-access:9173

Show key headers only | View raw

What I concluded from my investigations and a discussion in a private 
newsgroup is (if you use some features such as the spell checker) you should 
try to run it under the runtime that matches the version of Office loaded on 
the user's computer.

-- 
Larry Linson
  Microsoft Office Access MVP
  Co-Author, Microsoft Access Small Business Solutions, Wiley 2010

"croy" <hate@spam.invalid.net> wrote in message 
news:kt9ki9d01gj143ru8f6o7ub9dalq983tkp@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:54:52 -0500, "Access Developer"
> <accdevel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>More on running older verson Access databases under Access 2007, 2010, or
>>2013 runtimes.  Access MVP Paul Baldy told me that he'd tried a couple of
>>Access 2000 databases and didn't have problems, but he didn't suggest that
>>_every_ Access 2000 would.
>
> Well, after all the wonderfull info you've come up with
> here, I am persistently confused.
>
> I've seen a few websites that offer some sort of application
> built with Access 2000, and they say that if you don't have
> Access 2000 installed, you'll have to download the free
> Access 2000 runtime, and install that first.
>
> Does that mean that if I send my family photos database,
> built with Access 2000, to my sister, who doesn't have
> Access installed at all, that she could install the Access
> 2000 Runtime, and then be able to use (view) the family
> photos database?
>
> I rummaged thru my old software CDs, and found the ART2000,
> apparently downloaded from Microsoft a number of years ago.
>
> Thanks for all your kind help.
>
> -- 
> croy

Thread

Access 2000 Developer Edition? croy <hate@spam.invalid.net> - 2014-03-15 07:28 -0700
  Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-15 22:05 -0500
    Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? croy <hate@spam.invalid.net> - 2014-03-16 10:25 -0700
      Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-16 16:45 -0500
      Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-17 21:00 -0500
        Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-18 00:54 -0500
          Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? croy <hate@spam.invalid.net> - 2014-03-19 16:33 -0700
            Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-20 01:17 -0500
            Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-20 01:20 -0500
              Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "PR" <randlov_(remove this)@post9.tele.dk> - 2014-03-22 21:04 +0100
                Re: Access 2000 Developer Edition? "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2014-03-23 14:13 -0500

csiph-web