Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compression > #744
| Newsgroups | comp.compression |
|---|---|
| From | stan <smoore@exis.net> |
| Subject | Re: my response to some recent posts |
| References | <fdc58d3f-84c3-4333-b433-2bae03c3a937@p4g2000vbt.googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <s8qrt8-e2k.ln1@invalid.net> (permalink) |
| Organization | TeraNews.com |
| Date | 2012-01-09 14:03 -0500 |
jules Gilbert wrote: < prophecy snipped> > Oh, one additional difference... I have a program. So you've often claimed. > So what was the program?, well it wasn't a compressor. Something like > that I suppose... <snip> > So that's what the program was, <more claims of mythical program snipped> This is like the worlds worst magic show. Everyone in the audience sees everything the magician does and no trick works nor is even mildly interesting. You might consider getting some nearly naked and pretty assistants. > And I am not talking about experimental blocks of data that are > derived using random number generators, Do you believe the input data to be random, regardless of the source? <snip> > Works every time. Again I have performed this test on > thousands of compressed files. But have you reversed the process once? > I've believe I've used good engineering techniques to do this work. You would be very wrong. Not only is there no visible evidence of any science or math, but to the contrary you have claimed that such knowledge can blind one to seeing possibilities. > I don't know that I can go much higher but what I say here is > accurate. You seem to have missed the point that your credibility here is zero. > Oh yeah, about bringing out a compressor... <snip> , using > the best means I know today, it's just not practical. I need to know > more, I think, or to involve others. Are you now claiming your method can't be implemented? > As each of you think about my claim to predict so many bits > successfully -- I recognize what a gulp that must be; Think credibility. > A firm with demonstrated ethics first, next, with a history in > successfully fighting off would-be infringers. Also, I am > especially willing to consider companies in China. Given China's record with IP, this seems strange. > You folks think I've been lying to you about what I have. To be clear, you've made claims you can't back up. > About China, I will need to see them change. Good luck with that. Is this the next problem you intend to attack?
Back to comp.compression | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
my response to some recent posts jules Gilbert <jules.stocks@gmail.com> - 2012-01-09 06:50 -0800
Re: my response to some recent posts Jim Leonard <mobygamer@gmail.com> - 2012-01-09 08:25 -0800
Re: my response to some recent posts stan <smoore@exis.net> - 2012-01-09 14:03 -0500
Re: my response to some recent posts Alex Mizrahi <alex.mizrahi@gmail.com> - 2012-01-09 21:54 +0200
Re: my response to some recent posts glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-09 21:41 +0000
Re: my response to some recent posts jules Gilbert <jules.stocks@gmail.com> - 2012-01-09 16:20 -0800
Re: my response to some recent posts Jim Leonard <mobygamer@gmail.com> - 2012-01-09 20:24 -0800
Re: my response to some recent posts Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-01-10 09:56 +0100
Re: my response to some recent posts Sebastian <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2012-01-10 04:42 -0800
Re: my response to some recent posts Earl_Colby_Pottinger <earlcolby.pottinger@sympatico.ca> - 2012-01-10 21:08 -0800
Re: my response to some recent posts jules Gilbert <jules.stocks@gmail.com> - 2012-01-11 17:48 -0800
Re: my response to some recent posts Earl_Colby_Pottinger <earlcolby.pottinger@sympatico.ca> - 2012-01-12 05:04 -0800
csiph-web