Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.chainon-marquant.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!198.186.190.251.MISMATCH!news-out.readnews.com!transit4.readnews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.11.MISMATCH!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe11.iad.POSTED!aa923de6!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.compression From: stan Subject: Re: my response to some recent posts References: User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Linux) Message-ID: Lines: 65 X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:05:08 UTC Organization: TeraNews.com Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:03:24 -0500 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compression:744 jules Gilbert wrote: < prophecy snipped> > Oh, one additional difference... I have a program. So you've often claimed. > So what was the program?, well it wasn't a compressor. Something like > that I suppose... > So that's what the program was, This is like the worlds worst magic show. Everyone in the audience sees everything the magician does and no trick works nor is even mildly interesting. You might consider getting some nearly naked and pretty assistants. > And I am not talking about experimental blocks of data that are > derived using random number generators, Do you believe the input data to be random, regardless of the source? > Works every time. Again I have performed this test on > thousands of compressed files. But have you reversed the process once? > I've believe I've used good engineering techniques to do this work. You would be very wrong. Not only is there no visible evidence of any science or math, but to the contrary you have claimed that such knowledge can blind one to seeing possibilities. > I don't know that I can go much higher but what I say here is > accurate. You seem to have missed the point that your credibility here is zero. > Oh yeah, about bringing out a compressor... , using > the best means I know today, it's just not practical. I need to know > more, I think, or to involve others. Are you now claiming your method can't be implemented? > As each of you think about my claim to predict so many bits > successfully -- I recognize what a gulp that must be; Think credibility. > A firm with demonstrated ethics first, next, with a history in > successfully fighting off would-be infringers. Also, I am > especially willing to consider companies in China. Given China's record with IP, this seems strange. > You folks think I've been lying to you about what I have. To be clear, you've made claims you can't back up. > About China, I will need to see them change. Good luck with that. Is this the next problem you intend to attack?