Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compression > #1296
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Niels Fröhling <spamtrap@adsignum.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compression |
| Subject | Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units |
| Date | Tue, 08 May 2012 00:42:21 -0600 |
| Lines | 8 |
| Message-ID | <a0rtihFu2kU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <jo2o6f$nd9$1@news.albasani.net> <357e1db3-17e2-4911-9423-1cf394d894d5@ns1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <jo38jj$p8u$1@news.albasani.net> <jo3fj1$65m$1@news.belwue.de> <jo3oq1$qhu$1@news.albasani.net> <jo3rpm$lv1$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jo3ulr$79j$1@news.albasani.net> <jo41tc$6le$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jo430j$fod$1@news.albasani.net> <jo463v$hdq$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jo47ev$o9a$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net ts0NzRQGFiv2DRD2pTnwjwUy0Gsb66sL3QlAThwVc5ZDjtteKOkSV5AMgoEbO8U+0j |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Iw91pCGz+uTNTizB2Xfh+0SaWVg= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-DE; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041206 Thunderbird/1.0 Mnenhy/0.7.1 |
| In-Reply-To | <jo47ev$o9a$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compression:1296 |
Show key headers only | View raw
> My layman's impression could certainly be wrong. But to me this seems > to be that LZW normally attempts to find as much correlations between > words as possible, which to a large part might actually not be > profitable work in practice. Can you name a language without correlations? Can you even point at digital data which is uncorrelated? (I'd exclude SETI captures here :^), that is likely uncorrelated data)
Back to comp.compression | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 10:26 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-05 02:41 -0700
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 15:06 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-05-05 17:05 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 19:42 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-05 18:33 +0000
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 21:22 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-05-05 21:31 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 22:19 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-05 20:17 +0000
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 22:36 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-05 21:29 +0000
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 23:52 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Niels Fröhling <spamtrap@adsignum.com> - 2012-05-08 00:42 -0600
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-08 08:19 +0000
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Niels Fröhling <spamtrap@adsignum.com> - 2012-05-09 15:14 -0600
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-09 22:17 -0700
csiph-web