Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compression > #1300
| From | Niels Fröhling <spamtrap@adsignum.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compression |
| Subject | Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units |
| Date | 2012-05-09 15:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <a10539FfasU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <jo430j$fod$1@news.albasani.net> <jo463v$hdq$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jo47ev$o9a$1@news.albasani.net> <a0rtihFu2kU1@mid.individual.net> <joakv1$99n$3@speranza.aioe.org> |
> The question is what might be in a file that one wants to compress, > and that might not be in a language. For example, one might be > working with GPS systems, and have files full of latitude and > longitude values. You can consider those "words", but might not > have any correlation. A format-type correlation is often enough for exploitation. The file "geo" of the Canterbury Corpus is the shining example, it's an array of floats, compressing it as bit-planes (knowing how the values correlate) yields a few tenths of percent of compression gain - because all the floats are in a specific correlating range AFAIR 0.0 to 1.0. There are no uncorrelated data-sets besides total random data. Sometimes there may not be strong enough a correlation, and then any high-order compressors compress bad/worst, but exploiting correlations is their business, not plain static stationary order-0. Ciao Niels
Back to comp.compression | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 10:26 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-05 02:41 -0700
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 15:06 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-05-05 17:05 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 19:42 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-05 18:33 +0000
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 21:22 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-05-05 21:31 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 22:19 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-05 20:17 +0000
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 22:36 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-05 21:29 +0000
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2012-05-05 23:52 +0200
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Niels Fröhling <spamtrap@adsignum.com> - 2012-05-08 00:42 -0600
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-08 08:19 +0000
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units Niels Fröhling <spamtrap@adsignum.com> - 2012-05-09 15:14 -0600
Re: Words as well as characters as encoding units James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-09 22:17 -0700
csiph-web