Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #1707
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Andreas Schramm <bassobajo@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | precedences vs. hierarchy |
| Date | Mon, 6 Jun 2016 09:08:56 +0200 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Lines | 17 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <16-06-001@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Injection-Info | miucha.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="19132"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords | parse, question |
| Posted-Date | 06 Jun 2016 08:35:43 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:1707 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi all, for specifying the syntax of operator expressions with multiple levels of precedences, there are essentially two approaches: (i) by precedence and associativity declarations, and (ii) by a hierarchy of non-terminals. Both approaches have been known and in use for decades. My question is: Are there trends in the public opinion in favor of one of them over the other? Or are they equally respected approaches? Best regards, Andreas
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
precedences vs. hierarchy Andreas Schramm <bassobajo@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:08 +0200
Re: precedences vs. hierarchy "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2016-06-06 17:08 +0200
Re: precedences vs. hierarchy Kaz Kylheku <545-066-4921@kylheku.com> - 2016-06-07 15:35 +0000
Re: precedences vs. hierarchy "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2016-06-07 22:53 +0200
Re: precedences vs. hierarchy anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-06-08 09:48 +0000
Re: precedences vs. hierarchy George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2016-06-06 12:35 -0400
Re: precedences vs. hierarchy federation2005@netzero.com - 2016-06-06 14:01 -0700
Example: The Full Syntax Of Prolog (Re: precedences vs. hierarchy) rockbrentwood@gmail.com - 2016-08-24 15:45 -0700
csiph-web