Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #1710
| From | "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: precedences vs. hierarchy |
| Date | 2016-06-06 17:08 +0200 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <16-06-004@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <16-06-001@comp.compilers> |
On 06/06/2016 09:08, Andreas Schramm wrote: > for specifying the syntax of operator expressions > with multiple levels of precedences, > there are essentially two approaches: > (i) by precedence and associativity declarations, and > (ii) by a hierarchy of non-terminals. (iii) By only precedence, which I prefer. Associativity is not needed if operator precedence is split into the left and right ones. That allows to express any associativity, unary operators included. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
precedences vs. hierarchy Andreas Schramm <bassobajo@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:08 +0200
Re: precedences vs. hierarchy "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2016-06-06 17:08 +0200
Re: precedences vs. hierarchy Kaz Kylheku <545-066-4921@kylheku.com> - 2016-06-07 15:35 +0000
Re: precedences vs. hierarchy "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2016-06-07 22:53 +0200
Re: precedences vs. hierarchy anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-06-08 09:48 +0000
Re: precedences vs. hierarchy George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2016-06-06 12:35 -0400
Re: precedences vs. hierarchy federation2005@netzero.com - 2016-06-06 14:01 -0700
Example: The Full Syntax Of Prolog (Re: precedences vs. hierarchy) rockbrentwood@gmail.com - 2016-08-24 15:45 -0700
csiph-web