Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compilers > #1263

Re: optimizing compilers for low power design

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end
From "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk>
Newsgroups comp.compilers
Subject Re: optimizing compilers for low power design
Date Mon, 16 Jun 2014 12:11:32 +0100
Organization virginmedia.com
Lines 16
Sender news@iecc.com
Approved comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID <14-06-008@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References <14-06-003@comp.compilers> <14-06-004@comp.compilers>
NNTP-Posting-Host news.iecc.com
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace miucha.iecc.com 1402934142 58546 2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970 (16 Jun 2014 15:55:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@iecc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Mon, 16 Jun 2014 15:55:42 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords optimize, architecture, comment
Posted-Date 16 Jun 2014 11:55:42 EDT
X-submission-address compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref csiph.com comp.compilers:1263

Show key headers only | View raw


Kaz,

> Furthermore, even if power cost is real, and you choose instructions according
> to power cost, it's not going to work because instructions have to be primarily
> chosen according to the computation that needs to be done.

There has been some interesting work on making power minimization
a constraint during instruction scheduling.

A surprising percentage of power is consumed when a signal changes from
0 to 1 or from 1 to 0.  So the idea is to arrange instruction order to
minimise the number of transitions at each bit position in an
instruction sequence.
[CMOS only uses power when it switches, so I'd think approximately all
of the power would be consumed when a signal changes.  The idea of
Gray coded instruction streams is weirdly appealing. -John]

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

optimizing compilers for low power design idatarm@gmail.com - 2014-06-15 05:20 -0700
  Re: optimizing compilers for low power design Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-06-15 15:43 +0000
    Re: optimizing compilers for low power design Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> - 2014-06-15 11:19 -0700
    Re: optimizing compilers for low power design <Pidgeot18@verizon.com.invalid> - 2014-06-15 18:58 -0500
    Re: optimizing compilers for low power design "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> - 2014-06-16 12:11 +0100
      Re: optimizing compilers for low power design George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2014-06-18 04:44 -0400
        Re: optimizing compilers for low power design glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-06-20 18:13 +0000
        Re: optimizing compilers for low power design Ivan Godard <ivan@ootbcomp.com> - 2014-06-20 11:52 -0700
        Re: optimizing compilers for low power design Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2014-06-20 12:16 -0700
        Re: optimizing compilers for low power design George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2014-06-20 17:24 -0400
    Re: optimizing compilers for low power design Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-06-16 13:30 -0400
  Re: optimizing compilers for low power design andrewchamberss@gmail.com - 2014-06-20 05:03 -0700

csiph-web