Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!news2.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:05:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4E947766.5000709@SPAM.comp-arch.net> (permalink) |
| Date | Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:05:42 -0700 |
| From | "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> |
| Reply-To | andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net |
| Organization | comp-arch.net |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.arch |
| Subject | Re: Q: bit shifting |
| References | <qcf5m8-h0g1.ln1@ntp6.tmsw.no> <1950273.1417.1318102073673.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqjw35> <7bq7m8-tvi1.ln1@ntp6.tmsw.no> <22053691.2482.1318188961201.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqnk41> <n5iam8-9pn1.ln1@ntp6.tmsw.no> <j6v346$5tq$1@USTR-NEWS.TR.UNISYS.COM> <28ibm8-6uo1.ln1@ntp6.tmsw.no> <j6vkel$htt$1@USTR-NEWS.TR.UNISYS.COM> <lm5cm8-1lp1.ln1@ntp6.tmsw.no> <92s697p3lu7f1ei913uipatg70ba6ip9dn@4ax.com> <j71lir$sl$1@USTR-NEWS.TR.UNISYS.COM> <7dr897hg02brl0rbjng83pu4rcnls4ee1a@4ax.com> |
| In-Reply-To | <7dr897hg02brl0rbjng83pu4rcnls4ee1a@4ax.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 34 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-Trace | sv3-Rj4JXB3/mtgRhoprN9SJ+Aqg1CwC7T4z5iRizaC935gRON30X/uulV1AFZsZ1cg4AGaKwNF0QMemLQ0!AQwdzwpclC2ctIgqWiD9JSD4RwFCIlR3CdAs3055Bu0B+hyV/+4ST35sLBVv9hY= |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@giganews.com |
| X-DMCA-Notifications | http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2792 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.arch:4144 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 10/11/2011 9:30 AM, Robert Wessel wrote: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:58:35 +0000 (UTC), timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim > McCaffrey) wrote: > >> In article<92s697p3lu7f1ei913uipatg70ba6ip9dn@4ax.com>, >> robertwessel2@yahoo.com says... >>> >>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:45:57 +0200, Terje Mathisen<"terje.mathisen at >>> tmsw.no"> wrote: >>> >>>> Tim McCaffrey wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Well, doesn't matter, nobody is going to change the instruction set >> now... >>>> >>>> Nope. >>> >>> >>> There is perhaps some hope - consider that Intel did mostly replace >>> the x87 stuff (obviously it's still there, but it's certainly not the >>> preferred FP ISA for new stuff). They also added LZCNT to replace the >>> messed up BSF. Perhaps it's more than just an off chance given just >>> how badly shifts are messed up for 64 bit code now. >> >> It is sometimes hard to track this, but I think AMD introduced that >> instruction.... > > > Indeed they were. And only recently adopted by Intel. I was not > aware of that. Would somebody like to summarize why BSF was messed up, and how LZCNT is better?
Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Q: bit shifting Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2011-10-07 13:31 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-10-07 12:17 +0100
Re: Q: bit shifting Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-10-07 17:35 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2011-10-07 09:31 -0700
Re: Q: bit shifting nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-10-07 17:16 +0100
Re: Q: bit shifting Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2011-10-07 23:13 -0700
Re: Q: bit shifting nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-10-08 09:56 +0100
Re: Q: bit shifting Andrew Reilly <areilly---@bigpond.net.au> - 2011-10-08 21:28 +0000
Re: Q: bit shifting timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2011-10-11 15:05 +0000
Re: Q: bit shifting Sean Case <seancase@tpg.com.au> - 2011-10-16 23:15 +1000
Re: Q: bit shifting timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2011-10-19 20:12 +0000
Re: Q: bit shifting Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-07 12:24 -0500
Re: Q: bit shifting Kai Harrekilde-Petersen <khp@harrekilde.dk> - 2011-10-07 19:27 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-10-08 10:41 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting Kai Harrekilde-Petersen <khp@harrekilde.dk> - 2011-10-08 11:28 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting Andrew Reilly <areilly---@bigpond.net.au> - 2011-10-08 21:38 +0000
Re: Q: bit shifting Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-08 22:57 -0500
Re: Q: bit shifting Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-10-09 08:18 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2011-10-19 15:08 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-11 16:41 -0700
Re: Q: bit shifting Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-10-12 07:55 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2011-10-12 10:21 -0700
Re: Q: bit shifting Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-10-12 21:22 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk - 2011-10-13 11:00 -0500
Re: Q: bit shifting Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-10-13 20:32 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting Mike Hore <mike_horeREM@OVE.invalid.aapt.net.au> - 2011-10-11 17:08 +1100
Re: Q: bit shifting MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2011-10-07 12:49 -0700
Re: Q: bit shifting nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-10-07 21:20 +0100
The word is devolving into 3 architectures (NOT?) "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-10-07 19:48 -0700
Re: The word is devolving into 3 architectures (NOT?) Mark Thorson <nospam@sonic.net> - 2011-10-07 19:56 -0800
Re: The word is devolving into 3 architectures (NOT?) "Skybuck Flying" <Windows7IsOK@DreamPC2006.com> - 2011-10-08 04:53 +0200
Re: The word is devolving into 3 architectures (NOT?) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-10-08 17:26 +0000
Re: Q: bit shifting Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-10-08 10:47 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2011-10-08 12:27 -0700
Re: Q: bit shifting Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-10-09 08:07 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2011-10-09 12:36 -0700
Re: Q: bit shifting Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-10-10 09:06 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2011-10-10 15:31 +0000
Re: Q: bit shifting Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-10-10 18:13 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2011-10-10 20:27 +0000
Re: Q: bit shifting Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-10-10 23:45 +0200
Re: Q: bit shifting Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-10 17:32 -0500
Re: Q: bit shifting timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2011-10-11 14:58 +0000
Re: Q: bit shifting Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-11 11:30 -0500
Re: Q: bit shifting "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-10-11 10:05 -0700
Re: Q: bit shifting timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2011-10-11 17:59 +0000
Re: Q: bit shifting timcaffrey@aol.com (Tim McCaffrey) - 2011-10-11 18:00 +0000
Re: Q: bit shifting Al Grant <algrant@myrealbox.com> - 2011-10-11 13:49 -0700
Re: Q: bit shifting Al Grant <algrant@myrealbox.com> - 2011-10-11 14:18 -0700
Re: Q: bit shifting Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-11 16:03 -0500
Re: Q: bit shifting MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2011-10-10 09:52 -0700
Re: Q: bit shifting anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-10-09 12:24 +0000
Re: Q: bit shifting nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-10-09 13:13 +0100
Re: Q: bit shifting Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2011-10-09 10:11 -0700
csiph-web