Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #24428 > unrolled thread
| Started by | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-28 18:55 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-07-31 22:39 -0400 |
| Articles | 8 on this page of 108 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.arch.embedded
Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-28 18:55 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 11:24 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-29 16:31 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 11:45 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-06-29 12:46 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-06-29 12:59 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-29 17:13 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2016-06-29 10:32 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-06-29 16:14 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 12:59 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 14:06 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 13:28 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2016-07-01 20:03 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 16:11 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2016-07-01 23:44 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-01 20:17 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-02 22:42 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-03 00:46 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 03:08 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-03 08:46 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-01 13:33 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 17:32 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-01 14:49 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 17:52 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 17:54 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2016-07-01 22:14 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 18:18 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2016-07-01 18:48 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 13:04 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 13:07 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 14:17 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 13:34 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-06-29 14:45 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-06-29 12:24 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 13:09 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2016-06-29 12:19 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 19:48 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-29 16:49 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip jeffj@panix.com (Jeff Jonas) - 2016-07-18 17:02 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-18 20:29 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-07-19 10:48 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-19 20:23 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-19 14:27 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 17:46 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 12:14 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 09:10 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-25 20:11 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-22 23:01 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 09:15 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-25 14:06 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-07-25 23:54 +0100
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-25 23:18 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 19:44 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-12-16 17:58 +0100
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2016-12-16 17:28 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-25 20:22 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 22:43 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-26 20:12 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-26 21:30 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-27 19:46 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2016-07-27 07:25 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-27 19:53 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-27 20:04 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-07-28 01:51 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 02:50 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2016-07-28 03:27 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 12:58 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-28 00:03 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Uwe Bonnes <bon@hertz.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> - 2016-07-28 10:19 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-29 14:52 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 02:19 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-30 20:03 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-30 17:11 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-30 20:54 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-08-01 09:45 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-01 11:52 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 22:17 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-01 22:28 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2016-08-02 23:14 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-30 18:05 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip kristoff <kristoff@skypro.be> - 2016-07-30 18:15 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-30 19:19 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-28 12:29 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 15:04 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Mel Wilson <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2016-07-28 14:07 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-28 20:10 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 10:08 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-27 19:49 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 00:30 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-28 20:13 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 02:23 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-30 20:06 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-31 13:55 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-31 09:12 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-31 17:22 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-31 10:26 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-31 17:38 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-31 10:49 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-31 17:56 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-31 19:21 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-08-01 02:47 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 17:11 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-07-31 18:54 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-31 20:14 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-08-01 03:42 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-31 21:05 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-08-01 04:38 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-07-31 22:39 -0400
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
| From | Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-01 02:47 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <nnm2n1$mn8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #24773 |
On 01.8.2016 г. 02:21, krw@attt.bizz wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:56:53 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> > wrote: > >> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:49, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:38:22 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:26, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:22:41 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 16:12, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 13:55:50 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 03:06, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>>> ..... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ARMs are not second sourced because different manufacturers don't >>>>>>>>>> generally make pin compatible packages. Even if they did and use the >>>>>>>>>> same processor, they don't use the same peripherals, so they aren't >>>>>>>>>> second sourced. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts? Spin the board if your suppliers croaks. If >>>>>>>>> they're still building the part, why would you want to change? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm pretty well over this discussion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You're lying, again. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But he was correct that you are trolling. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You're as stupid as he is, obviously. >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps so, engaging in an exchange with the troll of the group >>>>>> I have known to be that for many years. Not the brightest >>>>>> thing to waste my time with indeed. >>>>> >>>>> Yet you insist on doing what you think to be stupid. That *is* >>>>> classical stupid. >>>>> >>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts. Who cares about the same peripherals. >>>>>>>> So where is the second sourcing this is about, Einstein. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The peripherals are very similar. If your code isn't a pile of >>>>>>> spaghetti, changing one peripheral for another isn't a huge problem. >>>>>>> The hard stuff doesn't have to change. >>>>>> >>>>>> So you have to redesign the board, you have to modify the software >>>>>> and you have a "second source". Whoever told you you have anything >>>>>> to do with design and programming has lied. >>>>> >>>>> Better than having no product to sell. Yes. >>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have yet to see a post of yours which is other than trolling, >>>>>>>> could you please keep them within SED, not that CAE is perfect >>>>>>>> but we don't have any regular trolls. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To put it another way, "here's your sign." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A disagreement is not a troll, stupid. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, feel free to disagree you are a troll. Or that 1+1=2, >>>>>> whatever. >>>>> >>>>> Yet you're stupid enough to continue doing something that you think is >>>>> stupid. Amazing. ...or you're just another liar. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So where did I lie, Einstein. >>> >>> You don't read very well. Either you're stupid or you're a liar. Pick >>> one. >>> >> >> Ah, so there is an "either/or" now. > > You said it. I just clarified the choice. > >> Like your second sourced MCU-s >> which nobody second sources, I see. > > Now who's trolling? So, I'm to assume the answer is "liar". Good > enough. > You have yet to point to a lie I have told. You know you cannot - you must have been trying all day. So you are lying, clearly you take being a liar as something casual. One more reason for me to dislike you. Obviously once I have been stupid enough to engage with a troll I will be trolling, too. Being the group's troll for years does not make you own the rights for that, you know. I will not have the patience to troll you out of your habits of course, this would take days and days, but I can have some fun while you moan trying to unsay the nonsense you have said or at least steer the troll exchange elsewhere.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-31 17:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <878twh73ga.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> |
| In reply to | #24774 |
Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> writes: > I will not have the patience to troll you out of your habits of course, > this would take days and days, but I can have some fun while you moan Can you two get a room?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-31 18:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2uatpbd69cehpplqo6625u10pqe0ep6djh@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #24775 |
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:11:49 -0700, Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> wrote: >Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> writes: >> I will not have the patience to troll you out of your habits of course, >> this would take days and days, but I can have some fun while you moan > >Can you two get a room? As long as I don't have to watch. -- John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc lunatic fringe electronics
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@attt.bizz |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-31 20:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <oh4tpbdi4qr8klq2vg27b4q17jtavrb25r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #24774 |
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:47:46 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
>On 01.8.2016 ?. 02:21, krw@attt.bizz wrote:
>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:56:53 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:49, krw@attt.bizz wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:38:22 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:26, krw@attt.bizz wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:22:41 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 16:12, krw@attt.bizz wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 13:55:50 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 03:06, krw@attt.bizz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> .....
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ARMs are not second sourced because different manufacturers don't
>>>>>>>>>>> generally make pin compatible packages. Even if they did and use the
>>>>>>>>>>> same processor, they don't use the same peripherals, so they aren't
>>>>>>>>>>> second sourced.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts? Spin the board if your suppliers croaks. If
>>>>>>>>>> they're still building the part, why would you want to change?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm pretty well over this discussion.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You're lying, again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But he was correct that you are trolling.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're as stupid as he is, obviously.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps so, engaging in an exchange with the troll of the group
>>>>>>> I have known to be that for many years. Not the brightest
>>>>>>> thing to waste my time with indeed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet you insist on doing what you think to be stupid. That *is*
>>>>>> classical stupid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts. Who cares about the same peripherals.
>>>>>>>>> So where is the second sourcing this is about, Einstein.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The peripherals are very similar. If your code isn't a pile of
>>>>>>>> spaghetti, changing one peripheral for another isn't a huge problem.
>>>>>>>> The hard stuff doesn't have to change.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you have to redesign the board, you have to modify the software
>>>>>>> and you have a "second source". Whoever told you you have anything
>>>>>>> to do with design and programming has lied.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Better than having no product to sell. Yes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have yet to see a post of yours which is other than trolling,
>>>>>>>>> could you please keep them within SED, not that CAE is perfect
>>>>>>>>> but we don't have any regular trolls.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To put it another way, "here's your sign."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A disagreement is not a troll, stupid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, feel free to disagree you are a troll. Or that 1+1=2,
>>>>>>> whatever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet you're stupid enough to continue doing something that you think is
>>>>>> stupid. Amazing. ...or you're just another liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So where did I lie, Einstein.
>>>>
>>>> You don't read very well. Either you're stupid or you're a liar. Pick
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, so there is an "either/or" now.
>>
>> You said it. I just clarified the choice.
>>
>>> Like your second sourced MCU-s
>>> which nobody second sources, I see.
>>
>> Now who's trolling? So, I'm to assume the answer is "liar". Good
>> enough.
>>
>
>You have yet to point to a lie I have told. You know you cannot - you
>must have been trying all day. So you are lying, clearly you take
>being a liar as something casual. One more reason for me to dislike you.
Since you're illiterate, I'll map out the obvious for you.
- You said you didn't like talking to trolls
- You accused me of being a troll
- yet you insist on continuing this thread
So either
- you're stupid because you're doing what you don't want to do
- you're a liar because you do enjoy arguing with those who
you accuse of being trolls
- you lied that I'm a troll.
Boo Hoo, you don't like me.
>Obviously once I have been stupid enough to engage with a troll I will
>be trolling, too. Being the group's troll for years does not make you
>own the rights for that, you know.
So you admit that you are stupid. Too stupid to read, for sure.
>I will not have the patience to troll you out of your habits of course,
>this would take days and days, but I can have some fun while you moan
>trying to unsay the nonsense you have said or at least steer
>the troll exchange elsewhere.
So you don't like yourself either. That's understandable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-01 03:42 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <nnm5ua$uci$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #24776 |
On 01.8.2016 г. 03:14, krw@attt.bizz wrote: > On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:47:46 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> > wrote: > >> On 01.8.2016 ?. 02:21, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:56:53 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:49, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:38:22 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:26, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:22:41 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 16:12, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 13:55:50 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 03:06, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> ..... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ARMs are not second sourced because different manufacturers don't >>>>>>>>>>>> generally make pin compatible packages. Even if they did and use the >>>>>>>>>>>> same processor, they don't use the same peripherals, so they aren't >>>>>>>>>>>> second sourced. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts? Spin the board if your suppliers croaks. If >>>>>>>>>>> they're still building the part, why would you want to change? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm pretty well over this discussion. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You're lying, again. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But he was correct that you are trolling. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You're as stupid as he is, obviously. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Perhaps so, engaging in an exchange with the troll of the group >>>>>>>> I have known to be that for many years. Not the brightest >>>>>>>> thing to waste my time with indeed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet you insist on doing what you think to be stupid. That *is* >>>>>>> classical stupid. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts. Who cares about the same peripherals. >>>>>>>>>> So where is the second sourcing this is about, Einstein. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The peripherals are very similar. If your code isn't a pile of >>>>>>>>> spaghetti, changing one peripheral for another isn't a huge problem. >>>>>>>>> The hard stuff doesn't have to change. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So you have to redesign the board, you have to modify the software >>>>>>>> and you have a "second source". Whoever told you you have anything >>>>>>>> to do with design and programming has lied. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Better than having no product to sell. Yes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have yet to see a post of yours which is other than trolling, >>>>>>>>>> could you please keep them within SED, not that CAE is perfect >>>>>>>>>> but we don't have any regular trolls. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To put it another way, "here's your sign." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A disagreement is not a troll, stupid. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah, feel free to disagree you are a troll. Or that 1+1=2, >>>>>>>> whatever. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet you're stupid enough to continue doing something that you think is >>>>>>> stupid. Amazing. ...or you're just another liar. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So where did I lie, Einstein. >>>>> >>>>> You don't read very well. Either you're stupid or you're a liar. Pick >>>>> one. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ah, so there is an "either/or" now. >>> >>> You said it. I just clarified the choice. >>> >>>> Like your second sourced MCU-s >>>> which nobody second sources, I see. >>> >>> Now who's trolling? So, I'm to assume the answer is "liar". Good >>> enough. >>> >> >> You have yet to point to a lie I have told. You know you cannot - you >> must have been trying all day. So you are lying, clearly you take >> being a liar as something casual. One more reason for me to dislike you. > > Since you're illiterate, I'll map out the obvious for you. > > - You said you didn't like talking to trolls > - You accused me of being a troll > - yet you insist on continuing this thread Most of the above is true, yes. "Insist" is not true but I do continue it for now, just as you do. > > So either > - you're stupid because you're doing what you don't want to do I have done stupid things in the past and I probably will do some in the future, yes. I knew you were a troll and I knew you would respond the way you did beforehand; but I did take some fun of cornering you about the nonsense you said trying to demonstrate knowledge you do not have because I dislike you. > - you're a liar because you do enjoy arguing with those who I don't understand "those two", sorry. Are you that? This would be a medical issue. > you accuse of being trolls Yes. Both of you I suppose? > - you lied that I'm a troll. No, this is a fact. I have not seen one post of yours with substance and I have seen tens of your posts. Most of them are plain trolling. > > Boo Hoo, you don't like me. > >> Obviously once I have been stupid enough to engage with a troll I will >> be trolling, too. Being the group's troll for years does not make you >> own the rights for that, you know. > > So you admit that you are stupid. Too stupid to read, for sure. I have no problem admitting I have been stupid of course. Why are you so frightened of doing so? >> I will not have the patience to troll you out of your habits of course, >> this would take days and days, but I can have some fun while you moan >> trying to unsay the nonsense you have said or at least steer >> the troll exchange elsewhere. > > So you don't like yourself either. That's understandable. I don't spend much time thinking about liking myself or not so I don't know that. But I certainly don't produce the reasons to be disliked which you produce. You could of course have said you were wrong to claim there were ARM MCUs which have a second source, everybody says something stupid sometimes, and there would have been less posts demonstrating your incompetence. Be my guest, I'll stop when I get tired of it but I am not there yet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw@attt.bizz |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-31 21:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mh7tpbdbojs120104dgjmufdos62653jfa@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #24777 |
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 03:42:51 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote: >On 01.8.2016 ?. 03:14, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:47:46 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 01.8.2016 ?. 02:21, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:56:53 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:49, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:38:22 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:26, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:22:41 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 16:12, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 13:55:50 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 03:06, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> ..... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ARMs are not second sourced because different manufacturers don't >>>>>>>>>>>>> generally make pin compatible packages. Even if they did and use the >>>>>>>>>>>>> same processor, they don't use the same peripherals, so they aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>> second sourced. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts? Spin the board if your suppliers croaks. If >>>>>>>>>>>> they're still building the part, why would you want to change? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm pretty well over this discussion. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You're lying, again. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But he was correct that you are trolling. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You're as stupid as he is, obviously. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Perhaps so, engaging in an exchange with the troll of the group >>>>>>>>> I have known to be that for many years. Not the brightest >>>>>>>>> thing to waste my time with indeed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yet you insist on doing what you think to be stupid. That *is* >>>>>>>> classical stupid. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts. Who cares about the same peripherals. >>>>>>>>>>> So where is the second sourcing this is about, Einstein. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The peripherals are very similar. If your code isn't a pile of >>>>>>>>>> spaghetti, changing one peripheral for another isn't a huge problem. >>>>>>>>>> The hard stuff doesn't have to change. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So you have to redesign the board, you have to modify the software >>>>>>>>> and you have a "second source". Whoever told you you have anything >>>>>>>>> to do with design and programming has lied. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Better than having no product to sell. Yes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have yet to see a post of yours which is other than trolling, >>>>>>>>>>> could you please keep them within SED, not that CAE is perfect >>>>>>>>>>> but we don't have any regular trolls. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To put it another way, "here's your sign." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> A disagreement is not a troll, stupid. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yeah, feel free to disagree you are a troll. Or that 1+1=2, >>>>>>>>> whatever. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yet you're stupid enough to continue doing something that you think is >>>>>>>> stupid. Amazing. ...or you're just another liar. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So where did I lie, Einstein. >>>>>> >>>>>> You don't read very well. Either you're stupid or you're a liar. Pick >>>>>> one. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ah, so there is an "either/or" now. >>>> >>>> You said it. I just clarified the choice. >>>> >>>>> Like your second sourced MCU-s >>>>> which nobody second sources, I see. >>>> >>>> Now who's trolling? So, I'm to assume the answer is "liar". Good >>>> enough. >>>> >>> >>> You have yet to point to a lie I have told. You know you cannot - you >>> must have been trying all day. So you are lying, clearly you take >>> being a liar as something casual. One more reason for me to dislike you. >> >> Since you're illiterate, I'll map out the obvious for you. >> >> - You said you didn't like talking to trolls >> - You accused me of being a troll >> - yet you insist on continuing this thread > >Most of the above is true, yes. "Insist" is not true but I do >continue it for now, just as you do. I'm not the one who made the original assertion. > >> >> So either >> - you're stupid because you're doing what you don't want to do > >I have done stupid things in the past and I probably will do some >in the future, yes. I knew you were a troll and I knew you would >respond the way you did beforehand; but I did take some fun of >cornering you about the nonsense you said trying to demonstrate >knowledge you do not have because I dislike you. You're lying, again. In case you hadn't noticed, I really don't care whether you like me or beer, for that matter. You really appear to be lying, though. You simply can't stop yourself. > >> - you're a liar because you do enjoy arguing with those who > >I don't understand "those two", sorry. Are you that? This >would be a medical issue. Of course you don't. You're stupid, remember? > >> you accuse of being trolls > >Yes. Both of you I suppose? More evidence of "stupid". > >> - you lied that I'm a troll. > >No, this is a fact. I have not seen one post of yours with substance >and I have seen tens of your posts. Most of them are plain trolling. Well, it appears that the real answer may be "stupid liar". That works. >> >> Boo Hoo, you don't like me. >> >>> Obviously once I have been stupid enough to engage with a troll I will >>> be trolling, too. Being the group's troll for years does not make you >>> own the rights for that, you know. >> >> So you admit that you are stupid. Too stupid to read, for sure. > >I have no problem admitting I have been stupid of course. Why are you >so frightened of doing so? Frightened? No, you were the one who objected to either possibility that I proposed for your posting. Since you've admitted that you're stupid (after proving that you're illiterate), we only have to nail down "liar". You seem to be working on that one, now, too. > >>> I will not have the patience to troll you out of your habits of course, >>> this would take days and days, but I can have some fun while you moan >>> trying to unsay the nonsense you have said or at least steer >>> the troll exchange elsewhere. >> >> So you don't like yourself either. That's understandable. > >I don't spend much time thinking about liking myself or not so I don't >know that. But I certainly don't produce the reasons to be disliked >which you produce. You lie to yourself, too. Makes sense. > >You could of course have said you were wrong to claim there were ARM >MCUs which have a second source, everybody says something stupid >sometimes, and there would have been less posts demonstrating your >incompetence. There is only one manufacturer of ARM CPUs? You're either stupid or a liar (but both, now seems to be the more reasonable answer). >Be my guest, I'll stop when I get tired of it but I am not there yet. Keep going. You're simply proving that you're stupid and a liar, the more you post.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-01 04:38 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <nnm96q$4mh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #24778 |
On 01.8.2016 г. 04:05, krw@attt.bizz wrote: > On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 03:42:51 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> > wrote: > >> On 01.8.2016 ?. 03:14, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:47:46 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01.8.2016 ?. 02:21, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:56:53 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:49, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:38:22 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:26, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:22:41 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 16:12, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 13:55:50 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 03:06, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> ..... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ARMs are not second sourced because different manufacturers don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> generally make pin compatible packages. Even if they did and use the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> same processor, they don't use the same peripherals, so they aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> second sourced. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts? Spin the board if your suppliers croaks. If >>>>>>>>>>>>> they're still building the part, why would you want to change? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm pretty well over this discussion. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You're lying, again. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But he was correct that you are trolling. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You're as stupid as he is, obviously. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Perhaps so, engaging in an exchange with the troll of the group >>>>>>>>>> I have known to be that for many years. Not the brightest >>>>>>>>>> thing to waste my time with indeed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yet you insist on doing what you think to be stupid. That *is* >>>>>>>>> classical stupid. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts. Who cares about the same peripherals. >>>>>>>>>>>> So where is the second sourcing this is about, Einstein. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The peripherals are very similar. If your code isn't a pile of >>>>>>>>>>> spaghetti, changing one peripheral for another isn't a huge problem. >>>>>>>>>>> The hard stuff doesn't have to change. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So you have to redesign the board, you have to modify the software >>>>>>>>>> and you have a "second source". Whoever told you you have anything >>>>>>>>>> to do with design and programming has lied. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Better than having no product to sell. Yes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have yet to see a post of yours which is other than trolling, >>>>>>>>>>>> could you please keep them within SED, not that CAE is perfect >>>>>>>>>>>> but we don't have any regular trolls. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> To put it another way, "here's your sign." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A disagreement is not a troll, stupid. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yeah, feel free to disagree you are a troll. Or that 1+1=2, >>>>>>>>>> whatever. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yet you're stupid enough to continue doing something that you think is >>>>>>>>> stupid. Amazing. ...or you're just another liar. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So where did I lie, Einstein. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You don't read very well. Either you're stupid or you're a liar. Pick >>>>>>> one. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ah, so there is an "either/or" now. >>>>> >>>>> You said it. I just clarified the choice. >>>>> >>>>>> Like your second sourced MCU-s >>>>>> which nobody second sources, I see. >>>>> >>>>> Now who's trolling? So, I'm to assume the answer is "liar". Good >>>>> enough. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You have yet to point to a lie I have told. You know you cannot - you >>>> must have been trying all day. So you are lying, clearly you take >>>> being a liar as something casual. One more reason for me to dislike you. >>> >>> Since you're illiterate, I'll map out the obvious for you. >>> >>> - You said you didn't like talking to trolls >>> - You accused me of being a troll >>> - yet you insist on continuing this thread >> >> Most of the above is true, yes. "Insist" is not true but I do >> continue it for now, just as you do. > > I'm not the one who made the original assertion. >> >>> >>> So either >>> - you're stupid because you're doing what you don't want to do >> >> I have done stupid things in the past and I probably will do some >> in the future, yes. I knew you were a troll and I knew you would >> respond the way you did beforehand; but I did take some fun of >> cornering you about the nonsense you said trying to demonstrate >> knowledge you do not have because I dislike you. > > You're lying, again. In case you hadn't noticed, I really don't care > whether you like me or beer, for that matter. You really appear to be > lying, though. You simply can't stop yourself. Lying seems to be quite a part of your life, eh? You keep on talking about it in a clearly disturbed way, you want so much to catch me in a lie. Well, you cannot - and better stop trying because you won't, ever. You can only get suffocated of anger in your frustration, the symptoms are already there to see. >> >>> - you're a liar because you do enjoy arguing with those who >> >> I don't understand "those two", sorry. Are you that? This >> would be a medical issue. > > Of course you don't. You're stupid, remember? >> >>> you accuse of being trolls >> >> Yes. Both of you I suppose? > > More evidence of "stupid". Ah, you are already gulping. Suffocating may come next, beware. >> >>> - you lied that I'm a troll. >> >> No, this is a fact. I have not seen one post of yours with substance >> and I have seen tens of your posts. Most of them are plain trolling. > > Well, it appears that the real answer may be "stupid liar". That > works. Whatever works for you, just try not to suffocate. And yes you are a troll, a classic case. Do you really don't know it after all these years? >>> >>> Boo Hoo, you don't like me. >>> >>>> Obviously once I have been stupid enough to engage with a troll I will >>>> be trolling, too. Being the group's troll for years does not make you >>>> own the rights for that, you know. >>> >>> So you admit that you are stupid. Too stupid to read, for sure. >> >> I have no problem admitting I have been stupid of course. Why are you >> so frightened of doing so? > > Frightened? No, you were the one who objected to either possibility > that I proposed for your posting. Since you've admitted that you're > stupid (after proving that you're illiterate), we only have to nail > down "liar". You seem to be working on that one, now, too. So you are frightened to admit you are incompetent and are frightened to think why. >> >>>> I will not have the patience to troll you out of your habits of course, >>>> this would take days and days, but I can have some fun while you moan >>>> trying to unsay the nonsense you have said or at least steer >>>> the troll exchange elsewhere. >>> >>> So you don't like yourself either. That's understandable. >> >> I don't spend much time thinking about liking myself or not so I don't >> know that. But I certainly don't produce the reasons to be disliked >> which you produce. > > You lie to yourself, too. Makes sense. No, though I may occasionally be deluded like most people. Lying is part of your life, not mine, remember. >> You could of course have said you were wrong to claim there were ARM >> MCUs which have a second source, everybody says something stupid >> sometimes, and there would have been less posts demonstrating your >> incompetence. > > There is only one manufacturer of ARM CPUs? You're either stupid or a > liar (but both, now seems to be the more reasonable answer). You insist on demonstrating incompetence. Learn the meaning of "second source". I was with the impression someone was paying you to be an engineer of sorts? >> Be my guest, I'll stop when I get tired of it but I am not there yet. > > Keep going. You're simply proving that you're stupid and a liar, the > more you post. > Your turn, demonstrate some more incompetence. I may be losing the interest, you have to do better than just raging around if you want to keep me in.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | krw <krw@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-31 22:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <gedtpb5p7n7n2uji9ldcr1j6l66hc1ubi0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #24779 |
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 04:38:35 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote: >On 01.8.2016 ?. 04:05, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 03:42:51 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 01.8.2016 ?. 03:14, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:47:46 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 01.8.2016 ?. 02:21, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:56:53 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:49, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:38:22 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:26, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:22:41 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 16:12, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 13:55:50 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 03:06, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ..... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ARMs are not second sourced because different manufacturers don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generally make pin compatible packages. Even if they did and use the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same processor, they don't use the same peripherals, so they aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> second sourced. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts? Spin the board if your suppliers croaks. If >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're still building the part, why would you want to change? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm pretty well over this discussion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're lying, again. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But he was correct that you are trolling. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You're as stupid as he is, obviously. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps so, engaging in an exchange with the troll of the group >>>>>>>>>>> I have known to be that for many years. Not the brightest >>>>>>>>>>> thing to waste my time with indeed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yet you insist on doing what you think to be stupid. That *is* >>>>>>>>>> classical stupid. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts. Who cares about the same peripherals. >>>>>>>>>>>>> So where is the second sourcing this is about, Einstein. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The peripherals are very similar. If your code isn't a pile of >>>>>>>>>>>> spaghetti, changing one peripheral for another isn't a huge problem. >>>>>>>>>>>> The hard stuff doesn't have to change. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So you have to redesign the board, you have to modify the software >>>>>>>>>>> and you have a "second source". Whoever told you you have anything >>>>>>>>>>> to do with design and programming has lied. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Better than having no product to sell. Yes. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have yet to see a post of yours which is other than trolling, >>>>>>>>>>>>> could you please keep them within SED, not that CAE is perfect >>>>>>>>>>>>> but we don't have any regular trolls. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> To put it another way, "here's your sign." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A disagreement is not a troll, stupid. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, feel free to disagree you are a troll. Or that 1+1=2, >>>>>>>>>>> whatever. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yet you're stupid enough to continue doing something that you think is >>>>>>>>>> stupid. Amazing. ...or you're just another liar. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So where did I lie, Einstein. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You don't read very well. Either you're stupid or you're a liar. Pick >>>>>>>> one. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ah, so there is an "either/or" now. >>>>>> >>>>>> You said it. I just clarified the choice. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Like your second sourced MCU-s >>>>>>> which nobody second sources, I see. >>>>>> >>>>>> Now who's trolling? So, I'm to assume the answer is "liar". Good >>>>>> enough. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You have yet to point to a lie I have told. You know you cannot - you >>>>> must have been trying all day. So you are lying, clearly you take >>>>> being a liar as something casual. One more reason for me to dislike you. >>>> >>>> Since you're illiterate, I'll map out the obvious for you. >>>> >>>> - You said you didn't like talking to trolls >>>> - You accused me of being a troll >>>> - yet you insist on continuing this thread >>> >>> Most of the above is true, yes. "Insist" is not true but I do >>> continue it for now, just as you do. >> >> I'm not the one who made the original assertion. >>> >>>> >>>> So either >>>> - you're stupid because you're doing what you don't want to do >>> >>> I have done stupid things in the past and I probably will do some >>> in the future, yes. I knew you were a troll and I knew you would >>> respond the way you did beforehand; but I did take some fun of >>> cornering you about the nonsense you said trying to demonstrate >>> knowledge you do not have because I dislike you. >> >> You're lying, again. In case you hadn't noticed, I really don't care >> whether you like me or beer, for that matter. You really appear to be >> lying, though. You simply can't stop yourself. > >Lying seems to be quite a part of your life, eh? You keep on talking >about it in a clearly disturbed way, you want so much to catch me >in a lie. Well, you cannot - and better stop trying because you >won't, ever. You can only get suffocated of anger in your frustration, >the symptoms are already there to see. > Good Lord, you're stupid! >>> >>>> - you're a liar because you do enjoy arguing with those who >>> >>> I don't understand "those two", sorry. Are you that? This >>> would be a medical issue. >> >> Of course you don't. You're stupid, remember? >>> >>>> you accuse of being trolls >>> >>> Yes. Both of you I suppose? >> >> More evidence of "stupid". > >Ah, you are already gulping. Suffocating may come next, beware. Now you're projecting, too. > >>> >>>> - you lied that I'm a troll. >>> >>> No, this is a fact. I have not seen one post of yours with substance >>> and I have seen tens of your posts. Most of them are plain trolling. >> >> Well, it appears that the real answer may be "stupid liar". That >> works. > >Whatever works for you, just try not to suffocate. >And yes you are a troll, a classic case. Do you really >don't know it after all these years? > >>>> >>>> Boo Hoo, you don't like me. >>>> >>>>> Obviously once I have been stupid enough to engage with a troll I will >>>>> be trolling, too. Being the group's troll for years does not make you >>>>> own the rights for that, you know. >>>> >>>> So you admit that you are stupid. Too stupid to read, for sure. >>> >>> I have no problem admitting I have been stupid of course. Why are you >>> so frightened of doing so? >> >> Frightened? No, you were the one who objected to either possibility >> that I proposed for your posting. Since you've admitted that you're >> stupid (after proving that you're illiterate), we only have to nail >> down "liar". You seem to be working on that one, now, too. > >So you are frightened to admit you are incompetent and are frightened >to think why. Projecting again. >>> >>>>> I will not have the patience to troll you out of your habits of course, >>>>> this would take days and days, but I can have some fun while you moan >>>>> trying to unsay the nonsense you have said or at least steer >>>>> the troll exchange elsewhere. >>>> >>>> So you don't like yourself either. That's understandable. >>> >>> I don't spend much time thinking about liking myself or not so I don't >>> know that. But I certainly don't produce the reasons to be disliked >>> which you produce. >> >> You lie to yourself, too. Makes sense. > >No, though I may occasionally be deluded like most people. >Lying is part of your life, not mine, remember. No, you're just plain stupid. >>> You could of course have said you were wrong to claim there were ARM >>> MCUs which have a second source, everybody says something stupid >>> sometimes, and there would have been less posts demonstrating your >>> incompetence. >> >> There is only one manufacturer of ARM CPUs? You're either stupid or a >> liar (but both, now seems to be the more reasonable answer). > >You insist on demonstrating incompetence. Learn the meaning of "second >source". I was with the impression someone was paying you to be an >engineer of sorts? > >>> Be my guest, I'll stop when I get tired of it but I am not there yet. >> >> Keep going. You're simply proving that you're stupid and a liar, the >> more you post. >> > >Your turn, demonstrate some more incompetence. I may be losing the >interest, you have to do better than just raging around if you >want to keep me in. I'm not demonstrating anything. You're doing a good job of showing just how stupid you really are, though.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Back to top | Article view | comp.arch.embedded
csiph-web