Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #24777
| From | Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded, sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip |
| Date | 2016-08-01 03:42 +0300 |
| Organization | TGI |
| Message-ID | <nnm5ua$uci$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <ct3spbln1idukjhhkuhj8oihvnfpqikkdk@4ax.com> <nnl3jl$d42$1@dont-email.me> <8s1tpblb4k0bdb9f0fnsaltdqosvm9qb92@4ax.com> <nnm2n1$mn8$1@dont-email.me> <oh4tpbdi4qr8klq2vg27b4q17jtavrb25r@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 01.8.2016 г. 03:14, krw@attt.bizz wrote: > On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 02:47:46 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> > wrote: > >> On 01.8.2016 ?. 02:21, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:56:53 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:49, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:38:22 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 17:26, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:22:41 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 16:12, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 13:55:50 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 31.7.2016 ?. 03:06, krw@attt.bizz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> ..... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ARMs are not second sourced because different manufacturers don't >>>>>>>>>>>> generally make pin compatible packages. Even if they did and use the >>>>>>>>>>>> same processor, they don't use the same peripherals, so they aren't >>>>>>>>>>>> second sourced. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts? Spin the board if your suppliers croaks. If >>>>>>>>>>> they're still building the part, why would you want to change? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm pretty well over this discussion. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You're lying, again. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But he was correct that you are trolling. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You're as stupid as he is, obviously. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Perhaps so, engaging in an exchange with the troll of the group >>>>>>>> I have known to be that for many years. Not the brightest >>>>>>>> thing to waste my time with indeed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet you insist on doing what you think to be stupid. That *is* >>>>>>> classical stupid. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Who cares about pinouts. Who cares about the same peripherals. >>>>>>>>>> So where is the second sourcing this is about, Einstein. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The peripherals are very similar. If your code isn't a pile of >>>>>>>>> spaghetti, changing one peripheral for another isn't a huge problem. >>>>>>>>> The hard stuff doesn't have to change. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So you have to redesign the board, you have to modify the software >>>>>>>> and you have a "second source". Whoever told you you have anything >>>>>>>> to do with design and programming has lied. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Better than having no product to sell. Yes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have yet to see a post of yours which is other than trolling, >>>>>>>>>> could you please keep them within SED, not that CAE is perfect >>>>>>>>>> but we don't have any regular trolls. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To put it another way, "here's your sign." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A disagreement is not a troll, stupid. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah, feel free to disagree you are a troll. Or that 1+1=2, >>>>>>>> whatever. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet you're stupid enough to continue doing something that you think is >>>>>>> stupid. Amazing. ...or you're just another liar. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So where did I lie, Einstein. >>>>> >>>>> You don't read very well. Either you're stupid or you're a liar. Pick >>>>> one. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ah, so there is an "either/or" now. >>> >>> You said it. I just clarified the choice. >>> >>>> Like your second sourced MCU-s >>>> which nobody second sources, I see. >>> >>> Now who's trolling? So, I'm to assume the answer is "liar". Good >>> enough. >>> >> >> You have yet to point to a lie I have told. You know you cannot - you >> must have been trying all day. So you are lying, clearly you take >> being a liar as something casual. One more reason for me to dislike you. > > Since you're illiterate, I'll map out the obvious for you. > > - You said you didn't like talking to trolls > - You accused me of being a troll > - yet you insist on continuing this thread Most of the above is true, yes. "Insist" is not true but I do continue it for now, just as you do. > > So either > - you're stupid because you're doing what you don't want to do I have done stupid things in the past and I probably will do some in the future, yes. I knew you were a troll and I knew you would respond the way you did beforehand; but I did take some fun of cornering you about the nonsense you said trying to demonstrate knowledge you do not have because I dislike you. > - you're a liar because you do enjoy arguing with those who I don't understand "those two", sorry. Are you that? This would be a medical issue. > you accuse of being trolls Yes. Both of you I suppose? > - you lied that I'm a troll. No, this is a fact. I have not seen one post of yours with substance and I have seen tens of your posts. Most of them are plain trolling. > > Boo Hoo, you don't like me. > >> Obviously once I have been stupid enough to engage with a troll I will >> be trolling, too. Being the group's troll for years does not make you >> own the rights for that, you know. > > So you admit that you are stupid. Too stupid to read, for sure. I have no problem admitting I have been stupid of course. Why are you so frightened of doing so? >> I will not have the patience to troll you out of your habits of course, >> this would take days and days, but I can have some fun while you moan >> trying to unsay the nonsense you have said or at least steer >> the troll exchange elsewhere. > > So you don't like yourself either. That's understandable. I don't spend much time thinking about liking myself or not so I don't know that. But I certainly don't produce the reasons to be disliked which you produce. You could of course have said you were wrong to claim there were ARM MCUs which have a second source, everybody says something stupid sometimes, and there would have been less posts demonstrating your incompetence. Be my guest, I'll stop when I get tired of it but I am not there yet.
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-28 18:55 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 11:24 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-29 16:31 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 11:45 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-06-29 12:46 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-06-29 12:59 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-29 17:13 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2016-06-29 10:32 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-06-29 16:14 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 12:59 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 14:06 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 13:28 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2016-07-01 20:03 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 16:11 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2016-07-01 23:44 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-01 20:17 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-02 22:42 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-03 00:46 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 03:08 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-03 08:46 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-01 13:33 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 17:32 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-01 14:49 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 17:52 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 17:54 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2016-07-01 22:14 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 18:18 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2016-07-01 18:48 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 13:04 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 13:07 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 14:17 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 13:34 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-06-29 14:45 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-06-29 12:24 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-06-29 13:09 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2016-06-29 12:19 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-29 19:48 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-06-29 16:49 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip jeffj@panix.com (Jeff Jonas) - 2016-07-18 17:02 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-18 20:29 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-07-19 10:48 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-19 20:23 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-19 14:27 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 17:46 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 12:14 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 09:10 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-25 20:11 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-22 23:01 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 09:15 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-25 14:06 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-07-25 23:54 +0100
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-25 23:18 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 19:44 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-12-16 17:58 +0100
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2016-12-16 17:28 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-25 20:22 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 22:43 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-26 20:12 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-26 21:30 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-27 19:46 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat> - 2016-07-27 07:25 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-27 19:53 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-27 20:04 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-07-28 01:51 -0500
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 02:50 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2016-07-28 03:27 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 12:58 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-28 00:03 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Uwe Bonnes <bon@hertz.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> - 2016-07-28 10:19 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-29 14:52 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 02:19 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-30 20:03 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-30 17:11 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-30 20:54 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-08-01 09:45 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-01 11:52 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2016-08-01 22:17 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-01 22:28 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2016-08-02 23:14 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-30 18:05 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip kristoff <kristoff@skypro.be> - 2016-07-30 18:15 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-30 19:19 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-28 12:29 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 15:04 +0200
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Mel Wilson <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2016-07-28 14:07 +0000
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-28 20:10 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 10:08 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-27 19:49 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 00:30 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-28 20:13 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 02:23 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-30 20:06 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-31 13:55 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-31 09:12 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-31 17:22 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-31 10:26 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-31 17:38 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-31 10:49 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-31 17:56 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-31 19:21 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-08-01 02:47 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-31 17:11 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-07-31 18:54 -0700
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-31 20:14 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-08-01 03:42 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw@attt.bizz - 2016-07-31 21:05 -0400
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-08-01 04:38 +0300
Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-07-31 22:39 -0400
csiph-web