Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #28305
| From | pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable |
| Date | 2018-11-02 14:36 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <prhjtk$b71$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <pr9o50$m9b$1@dont-email.me> <7686c6c0-7f2a-49b9-94d2-da49b7ab32ef@googlegroups.com> <prc4e3$chj$1@dont-email.me> <prccn8$spf$1@reader1.panix.com> <prcljq$9v1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Il 31/10/2018 17:35, John Speth ha scritto: > On 10/31/2018 7:03 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2018-10-31, pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I think I need it for 500m link. Is the usual 120R ok? >> >> The terminating resistor value is chosen to match the cable's >> impedance. > > I have no experience with long wire RS485 applications. I find it hard > to believe that an appropriately sized resistor is not on the top of the > list of RS485 best practices. I have solved so many "long" wire > problems by just adding termination resistors (in my case long wires are > actually short but appear long due to edge speeds). The model of the link can be a simple resistor or a transmission line. The termination resistor is needed if the link can't be modelized as a simple resistor, but as a transmission line. So the main question is: when the link can't be modeled as a simple resistor? For what I understood [1], it depends on two factors: the length of the link *and* the speed of signal (baudrate). Assuming 60% speed of light, 1km propagation delay is only 5us. At 9600bps, one bit time is 104us, 20 times higher. I don't think termination resistor, even useful, can increase performance. In my experience with many "small" RS485 networks, I never used termination resistors. When I tried to solve some problems with termination resistor, I never had good results. [1] http://www.diit.unict.it/users/scava/dispense/II/RS485.pdf
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RS485 over optical fiber cable pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 15:00 +0100
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2018-10-30 07:26 -0700
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 12:41 +0100
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2018-10-31 05:55 -0700
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 14:03 +0000
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable John Speth <johnspeth@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-31 09:35 -0700
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-31 16:48 +0000
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 14:44 +0100
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-11-02 11:00 -0400
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-11-02 20:42 +0200
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable raimond.dragomir@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 08:18 -0700
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Mike Perkins <spam@spam.com> - 2018-11-02 15:22 +0000
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2018-11-02 21:31 +0200
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Mike Perkins <spam@spam.com> - 2018-11-02 20:12 +0000
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2018-11-02 23:57 +0100
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-11-03 01:18 +0200
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Mike Perkins <spam@spam.com> - 2018-11-03 19:05 +0000
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-11-03 17:36 -0400
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com - 2018-11-03 19:49 -0700
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-11-04 07:50 +0200
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 09:40 +0100
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2018-11-05 06:45 -0500
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2018-11-05 09:12 -0800
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-02 18:21 +0000
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-11-03 00:02 +0200
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 14:36 +0100
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable "Mat Nieuwenhoven" <mnieuw@zap.a2000.nl> - 2018-10-31 16:32 +0100
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-10-31 22:41 +0200
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Chris <c@b.a> - 2018-10-31 12:16 +1100
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-11-02 06:52 +0200
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-31 09:11 -0500
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable peter jakacki <peterjakacki@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 19:57 -0800
Re: RS485 over optical fiber cable upsidedown@downunder.com - 2018-11-13 08:09 +0200
csiph-web