Re: C++, Ada, ...

From	Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.arch.embedded
Subject	Re: C++, Ada, ...
Date	2021-04-19 16:01 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<877dkxyj3o.fsf@nightsong.com> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <ie32luFlvghU1@mid.individual.net> <s5hogv$77o$1@dont-email.me> <ie55l3F3ou7U1@mid.individual.net> <87blaagjyc.fsf@nightsong.com> <ie6aruFat9fU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> writes:
> You can impose that constraint if you want to: if I had defined
>    type Zero_Handler is not null access procedure;
> then the above declaration of the At_Zero component would be illegal,
> and the compiler would insist on a non-null initial value.

Oh, this is nice.

> But IMO sometimes you need pointers that can be null, just as you
> sometimes need null values in a database.

Preferable these days is to use a separate type for a value that is
nullable or optional, so failing to check for null gives a compile-time
type error.  This is 't Option in ML, Maybe a in Haskell, and iirc
std::Optional<T> these days in C++.

> The state of the art in Ada implementations of critical systems is
> slowly becoming to use static analysis and proof tools to verify that
> no run-time check failures, such as accessing a null pointer, can
> happen. That is already fairly easy to do with the AdaCore tools
> (CodePeer, SPARK and others). Proving functional correctness still
> remains hard.

I know about SPARK.  Is CodePeer something along the same lines?  Is it
available through GNU, or is it Adacore proprietary or what?

I still have Burns & Wellings' book on SPARK on the recommendation of
someone here.  It looks good but has been in my want-to-read pile since
forever.  One of these days.

Thread

C++, Ada, ... pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2021-04-17 17:48 +0200
  Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-17 18:45 +0200
    Re: C++, Ada, ... Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2021-04-17 19:55 +0100
      Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-18 12:53 +0200
        Re: C++, Ada, ... Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2021-04-18 18:48 +0300
          Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-18 18:59 +0200
            Re: C++, Ada, ... Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2021-04-19 13:51 +0300
              Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-19 14:22 +0200
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2021-04-19 19:16 +0300
                Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-19 22:19 +0200
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2021-04-20 01:03 +0300
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-04-19 18:09 -0400
                Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-20 06:58 +0200
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2021-04-19 23:18 -0700
                Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-20 09:36 +0200
              Re: C++, Ada, ... Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2021-04-19 12:20 -0700
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2021-04-20 00:26 +0300
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2021-04-19 16:01 -0700
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2021-04-20 10:47 +0300
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2021-04-19 23:30 +0100
    Re: C++, Ada, ... Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2021-04-18 08:29 +1000
    Re: C++, Ada, ... Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2021-04-18 10:39 +0300
      Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-18 14:59 +0200
        Re: C++, Ada, ... Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2021-04-18 19:23 +0300
          Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-18 19:26 +0200
            Re: C++, Ada, ... Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2021-04-18 19:29 +0100
              Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-18 22:23 +0200
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2021-04-18 23:09 +0100
                Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-19 08:56 +0200
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2021-04-19 14:04 +0300
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2021-04-19 15:16 +0300
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2021-04-19 12:47 -0700
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2021-04-20 00:37 +0300
                Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-20 07:50 +0200
                Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-19 14:26 +0200
            Re: C++, Ada, ... Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2021-04-18 19:30 +0100
              Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-18 22:17 +0200
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2021-04-18 23:17 +0100
                Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-19 08:52 +0200
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2021-04-19 10:08 +0100
                Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-19 12:15 +0200
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2021-04-19 12:00 +0100
                Re: C++, Ada, ... Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2021-04-19 16:15 +0300
                Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-19 15:43 +0200
    Re: C++, Ada, ... pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2021-04-19 18:38 +0200
      Re: C++, Ada, ... Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2021-04-19 10:48 -0700
      Re: C++, Ada, ... Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2021-04-19 19:33 +0100
        Re: C++, Ada, ... Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2021-04-20 15:09 +0300
          Re: C++, Ada, ... Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2021-04-20 15:29 +0100
      Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-19 22:48 +0200
        Re: C++, Ada, ... pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2021-04-19 23:17 +0200
          Re: C++, Ada, ... Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2021-04-19 15:55 -0700
            Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-20 08:21 +0200
          Re: C++, Ada, ... David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-20 08:20 +0200
  Re: C++, Ada, ... Dave Nadler <drn@nadler.com> - 2021-04-17 21:07 -0400
    Re: C++, Ada, ... Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2021-04-17 18:53 -0700
    Re: C++, Ada, ... Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2021-04-18 09:42 +0100
  Re: C++, Ada, ... dalai lamah <antonio12358@hotmail.com> - 2021-04-18 14:39 +0200

csiph-web