Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #13288
| From | Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: 3D printers for small run boards |
| Date | 2013-09-01 04:51 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <5223001B.DA3303F7@bytecraft.com> (permalink) |
| References | <5221D5B1.E7869DCC@bytecraft.com> <l0d529lbf1vjanfrd2l82202ida735qd84@4ax.com> |
Jon Kirwan wrote: > On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 07:38:25 -0400, Walter Banks > <walter@bytecraft.com> wrote: > > >I have had a couple conversations in the last month about the future > >of 3D printers. > > > >One potential application that has come up is the ability to create > >prototype (or small run ) circuit boards. The possibilities are lots > >of layers, layers of varying thickness, cooling tubes and potential > >when combined with a pick and place robot for embedded > >components, processors. > > > >Is anyone providing this type of printer yet within the price range > >of small to medium sized companies? > > > >w.. > > Hi, Walter. I have a 3D printer here and some conductive > plastic for it, as well (about 100 ohms per cm, if I recall.) > I usually print at 0.22mm layer thicknesses, but could go > .15mm or less perhaps. Or more. The nozzle is 0.4mm for > extrusion. But while I can easily do conductive layers like > this, you are talking 10k to 100k ohm ranges for anything > reasonable. So it's not really useful for anything but high > impedances. I've been playing a little with it for touch > sensors and the like. There probably is more conductive > plastic available. But I just don't have any right now and > honestly have no idea if much more conductive is even > possible in the system I have here. > > Laying down conductive wire itself would also be possible and > that could be buried into the plastic. I'd probably want a > 2nd head just for the wire itself and I'd need a way to snip > it. Could just be bare wires and those can be buried in hot > plastic, easily. > > Placing parts? I honestly haven't seen a pick and place robot > running before, but it must be very precise so that's good. Pick and place robots that are quite precise are available for small automated manufacturing machines. It has been a while but 20 years ago they were probably good to 0.1 mm or so. Board manufacturing accuracy is essential a 2D problem. w..
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
3D printers for small run boards Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2013-08-31 07:38 -0400
Re: 3D printers for small run boards bbhack <bbhack@gmail.com> - 2013-08-31 13:19 -0500
Re: 3D printers for small run boards Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2013-09-01 04:46 -0400
Re: 3D printers for small run boards bbhack <bbhack@gmail.com> - 2013-09-01 11:26 -0500
Re: 3D printers for small run boards Theo Markettos <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2013-09-04 16:39 +0100
Re: 3D printers for small run boards bbhack <bbhack@gmail.com> - 2013-09-04 14:06 -0500
Re: 3D printers for small run boards Jon Kirwan <jonk@infinitefactors.org> - 2013-08-31 21:39 -0700
Re: 3D printers for small run boards Jon Kirwan <jonk@infinitefactors.org> - 2013-08-31 21:41 -0700
Re: 3D printers for small run boards Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2013-09-01 04:51 -0400
csiph-web