Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.electronics > #35556
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.electronics |
| Subject | Re: Reliability of electronics |
| Date | 2022-05-31 14:05 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <jflighF822lU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <f8fc3351-226f-4902-ba2f-ce5708ef5672n@googlegroups.com> <jflb6pF6q7sU1@mid.individual.net> <6142357c-1c67-48db-a0f9-a452203a2b3bn@googlegroups.com> <jflhaaF7sppU1@mid.individual.net> <598f32dd-1dcd-4383-8219-14105408cc74n@googlegroups.com> |
On 31/05/2022 2:02 pm, Phil Allison wrote: > Trevor Wilson wrote: > ================= >>> >> **Good plan. FWIW: The Model 500 never overheated. Thermostat >> controlled, two speed fan cooled. Output devices were all mica/thermal >> paste mounted. Even after repair (using original output devices) the >> amps failed. Only after the output devices were substituted with >> Japanese types did reliability significantly improve. >> > > ** Were the SJs in steel or Aluminium paks? **Like all Motorola TO3 devices of the early 1970s, they were in those horrible aluminium packs. > > Early 70s Motorola TO3s had a big problem with thermal expansion of chip headers. > The silicon and the header had differing tempcos of expansion. > The end result was the chip developed micro cracks. **Yep. I recall reading the RCA white paper on the issue. > > Such devices were speced at a mere 5000 thermal cycles. > OK for some apps but not class AB audio. > Sudden, unaccountable failure was the norm. > > Aluminium paks got dumped and were never seen again. **Yep. Steel or copper is the way to go for TO3 devices. RCA won the argument.
Back to aus.electronics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Reliability of electronics Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2022-05-30 17:24 +1000
Re: Reliability of electronics Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2022-05-30 19:33 +1000
Re: Reliability of electronics Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 16:01 -0700
Re: Reliability of electronics Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2022-05-31 10:35 +1000
Re: Reliability of electronics Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 17:59 -0700
Re: Reliability of electronics Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2022-05-31 11:31 +1000
Re: Reliability of electronics Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 18:52 -0700
Re: Reliability of electronics Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2022-05-31 12:00 +1000
Re: Reliability of electronics Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 20:03 -0700
Re: Reliability of electronics Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2022-05-31 13:45 +1000
Re: Reliability of electronics Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 21:02 -0700
Re: Reliability of electronics Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2022-05-31 14:05 +1000
Re: Reliability of electronics Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2022-05-31 14:08 +1000
Re: Reliability of electronics Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> - 2022-05-31 14:18 +1000
Re: Reliability of electronics Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 21:32 -0700
Re: Reliability of electronics Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2022-05-30 21:26 -0700
csiph-web