Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #652061 > unrolled thread

he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen

Back to article view | Back to alt.usenet.kooks

Contents

  he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-11 05:42 -0500
    Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 22:16 +0800
      Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 15:06 +0000
        Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-12 00:47 +0800
      Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:54 +0100
        Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-13 16:01 +0800
          Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:12 +0100
            Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-14 14:35 +0800
              Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 16:03 +0100
        Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-13 03:09 -0600
    Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-12 03:52 +0000
      Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-12 15:46 +0800
        Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-12 08:19 +0000
          Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-12 16:33 +0800
            Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-12 08:53 +0000
              Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-12 17:12 +0800
                Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-12 09:16 +0000
                  Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-13 16:53 +0800
                    Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-13 03:18 -0600
                    Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Psychotic Chicken <Bill@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-15 10:18 +0000
    he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 01:34 +0100
      Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-03-21 17:52 -0700
        Re: he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-21 18:06 -0700

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#652061 — he doesn't even know the electronegativity of oxygen

-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007

 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#652073

I think fakey really does know.
Why is he so afraid of saying it?

Hey, maybe if he holds his breath and turns blue, all the
oxygen atoms in the universe will suddenly have a +8
electronegativity.  I would be impressed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652083

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> wrote:

> I think fakey really does know.
> Why is he so afraid of saying it?
> 
> Hey, maybe if he holds his breath and turns blue, all the
> oxygen atoms in the universe will suddenly have a +8
> electronegativity.  I would be impressed.
>

But, but, doesn't that mean that chemistry as we know it would be
completely disrupted and all the water molecules in the Universe would
be plasmatised? (plasmatified? plasmicated? -- I dunno...)

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe       <snipeco.1@gmail.com>

My mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts.
My pet rock Gordon wants out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652093

snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> wrote:
> 
> > I think fakey really does know.
> > Why is he so afraid of saying it?
> > 
> > Hey, maybe if he holds his breath and turns blue, all the
> > oxygen atoms in the universe will suddenly have a +8
> > electronegativity.  I would be impressed.
> >
> 
> But, but, doesn't that mean that chemistry as we know it would be
> completely disrupted and all the water molecules in the Universe would
> be plasmatised? (plasmatified? plasmicated? -- I dunno...)

Omg.  Fakey holds the universe in his sweaty little hands!

We better start being nice to him, or he will plasmatize (US
spelling) all of us.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652306

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
<news:6lk5eb1n7kcteef3bhs6d63k51hj78am1r@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> I think fakey really does know.
> Why is he so afraid of saying it?
> 
> Hey, maybe if he holds his breath and turns blue, all the
> oxygen atoms in the universe will suddenly have a +8
> electronegativity.

*You* stupidly persist in k'laming me to think electronegativity 
is nuclear charge. I've never mentioned the nucleus in this 
discussion, you did. Because you don't realize you're yet again 
blathering on about something you know little about.

You're blathering on about nuclear charge without knowing you're 
actually blathering on about *effective* nuclear charge, which is 
different for different electron orbital shells.

You keep bleating about the number of protons in the nucleus as your 
kooky "nuclear charge" of 8, but it's not 8, in the 1s orbital it's 
7.658, in the 2s orbital it's 4.492, in the 2p orbital it's 4.453.

Because you didn't know the number of protons does *not* equal the 
effective nuclear charge of an atom.

Zeff = Z - S

Were you perhaps instead thinking of the atomic number, Moron?

Moron?...

SPNAK!

> I would be impressed.

Awww, I've let the moron bleat out his stupidity long enough... bend
over and ready yourself for Das Boot, Shiny Tinfoil Brain. LOL

Aren't you the moron who k'lames that elemental oxygen has a constant 
electronegativity?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronegativity>
=================================================
As it is usually calculated, electronegativity is not a property of an 
atom alone, but rather a property of an atom in a molecule.[4]

The property of electronegativity of an atom in a molecule is 
different from the electrode potential of the element, which depends 
on the difference in free energy of the element in its standard state 
and in ionic solution, and it is different from the ionization 
potential of the atom, and from its electron affinity; although it is 
related to these properties in a general way.

It has been found possible to formulate an electronegativity scale of 
the elements by the analysis of the values of delta and delta_umlaut 
given by the single-bond energies. In Table 3-6 values of delta_umlaut 
are listed for the bonds between nonmetallic atoms whose energies are 
given in Table 3-4. These are obtained in the same ways as those in 
Table 3-3. It is seen on inspection that the values of delta_umlaut do 
not satisfy an additivity relation; they cannot be represented as 
differences of terms characteristic of the two atoms in a bond. 
However, the square roots of the delta_umlaut values do satisfy 
approximately a relation of this sort.

The method just described for formulating the electronegativity scale 
cannot be used for the remaining elements in general because of a lack 
of knowledge of enthalpies of formation of their compounds as gases 
and of the values of single-bond energies for the elements themselves.

Except for nitrogen and oxygen, which are discussed below, the 
elements in their standard states do not differ much in energy from 
states involving normal single covalent bonds between the atoms.

It is the unusual stability of multiple bonds for oxygen and nitrogen, 
stabilizing their normal states, that often leads to negative values 
of the enthalpy of formation of substances.

By the use of Equation 3-13 the difference in electronegativity of two 
elements can be calculated from the enthalpy of formation of the 
compounds formed by them.

Table 3-8: The values given in the table refer to the common oxidation 
states of the elements. For some elements variation of the 
electronegativity with oxidation number is observed.

[4] Pauling, Linus (1960). Nature of the Chemical Bond. Cornell 
University Press. pp. 88–107. ISBN 0-8014-0333-2.
=================================================

How do you oxidize *oxygen* except with fluorine to figure out its 
enthalpy of formation and thus its exact electronegativity, you 
fecking *moron*? *No* *one* wants to formulate FOOF (O2F2) to find out 
the exact oxidation state of elemental oxygen. You know, FOOF, 
Lucifer's Gas? That shit makes *ice* explode. It makes asbestos 
*burn*. It reacts with gold. Hit it with a CO2 fire extinguisher, you 
just make it mad.

So... your bleating about oxygen's electronegativity means you're 
bleating about an approximation, Moron. Even Pauling himself admitted 
that elemental electronegativity is an approximation, and thus isn't 
all that accurate, which is why he only presented them with single 
decimal accuracy. Moron.

Further, oxygen's affinity for itself in forming multiple bonds means 
that for a lot of substances, the enthalpy of formation is negative, 
thus the electronegativity is dependent upon which substance oxygen is 
interacting with and whatever other factors contribute to or detract 
from that interaction.

Nitrogen is the same way, nitrogen trichloride isn't unstable because 
of weak N-Cl bonds, but rather because nitrogen is constantly trying 
to reform into triple-bonded N2, with a negative enthalpy of formation 
and thus exothermic reaction of nitrogen trichloride.

You know, Linus Pauling... the guy who developed the first accurate 
electronegativity scale for molecules... you think *he* might know a 
bit more about electronegativity than a moronic bleatfarting retard 
like you, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL

SPNAK!

Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?

<snicker>

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*);

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms;

That superposition is the same as wave interference;

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves;

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things;

That RMS isn't a DC voltage;

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L;

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1;

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave;

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering;

What a positive or negative vector is;

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero;

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic";

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an
electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

That nuclear charge does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652329

Fakey wrote:

> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronegativity>

Look at the periodic table, on the page YOU referenced,
kooktard.  See how it gives the electronegativity of each
element?

What's the electronegativity of oxygen, fakey?

Does that look like a +8?

-- 
"It (RMS voltage) is an *instantaneous* quadratic square of
the *instantaneous* voltage of an AC sinusoidal waveform,
and can thus be graphed as a sinusoid."
  --Fakey explains "RMS waveforms"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652469

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
<news:tc7aebds70v79lv754c0hi14gvpmr3gr6k@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> Fakey wrote:
> 
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronegativity>
> 
> Look at the periodic table, on the page YOU referenced,
> kooktard.  See how it gives the electronegativity of each
> element?

Which is an estimate, because electronegativity is only known for
atoms in molecules, as Linus Pauling stated in his seminal work on the
topic, Moron... and no one wants to formulate FOOF by oxidizing
oxygen, which would entail combining the two strongest oxidizers at
700 C to make an even stronger oxidizer that makes iron spontaneously
combust.

Further, because electronegativity is for atoms _in_ _molecules_, it
varies with what is being oxidized and what it is being oxidized with.

SPNAK!

Aren't you the moron who k'lames that elemental oxygen has a constant 
electronegativity?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronegativity>
=================================================
As it is usually calculated, electronegativity is not a property of an 
atom alone, but rather a property of an atom _in_ _a_ _molecule_.[4]

The property of electronegativity of an atom in a molecule is 
different from the electrode potential of the element, which depends 
on the difference in free energy of the element in its standard state 
and in ionic solution, and it is different from the ionization 
potential of the atom, and from its electron affinity; although it is 
related to these properties in a general way.

It has been found possible to formulate an electronegativity scale of 
the elements by the analysis of the values of delta and delta_umlaut 
given by the single-bond energies. In Table 3-6 values of delta_umlaut 
are listed for the bonds between nonmetallic atoms whose energies are 
given in Table 3-4. These are obtained in the same ways as those in 
Table 3-3. It is seen on inspection that the values of delta_umlaut do 
not satisfy an additivity relation; they cannot be represented as 
differences of terms characteristic of the two atoms in a bond. 
However, the square roots of the delta_umlaut values do satisfy 
approximately a relation of this sort.

The method just described for formulating the electronegativity scale 
cannot be used for the remaining elements in general because of a lack 
of knowledge of enthalpies of formation of their compounds as gases 
and of the values of single-bond energies for the elements themselves.

Except for nitrogen and oxygen, which are discussed below, the 
elements in their standard states do not differ much in energy from 
states involving normal single covalent bonds between the atoms.

It is the unusual stability of multiple bonds for oxygen and nitrogen, 
stabilizing their normal states, that often leads to negative values 
of the enthalpy of formation of substances.

By the use of Equation 3-13 the difference in electronegativity of two 
elements can be calculated from the enthalpy of formation of the 
compounds formed by them.

Table 3-8: The values given in the table refer to the common oxidation 
states of the elements. For some elements variation of the 
electronegativity with oxidation number is observed.

[4] Pauling, Linus (1960). Nature of the Chemical Bond. Cornell 
University Press. pp. 88–107. ISBN 0-8014-0333-2.
=================================================

How do you oxidize *oxygen* except with fluorine to figure out its 
enthalpy of formation and thus its exact electronegativity, you 
fecking *moron*? *No* *one* wants to formulate FOOF (O2F2) to find out 
the exact oxidation state of elemental oxygen. You know, FOOF, 
Lucifer's Gas? That shit makes *ice* explode. It makes asbestos 
*burn*. It reacts with gold. Hit it with a CO2 fire extinguisher, you 
just make it mad.

So... your bleating about oxygen's electronegativity means you're 
bleating about an approximation, Moron. Even Pauling himself admitted 
that elemental electronegativity is an approximation, and thus isn't 
all that accurate, which is why he only presented them with single 
decimal accuracy. Moron.

Further, oxygen's affinity for itself in forming multiple bonds means 
that for a lot of substances, the enthalpy of formation is negative, 
thus the electronegativity is dependent upon which substance oxygen is 
interacting with and whatever other factors contribute to or detract 
from that interaction.

Nitrogen is the same way, nitrogen trichloride isn't unstable because 
of weak N-Cl bonds, but rather because nitrogen is constantly trying 
to reform into triple-bonded N2, with a negative enthalpy of formation 
and thus exothermic reaction of nitrogen trichloride.

You know, Linus Pauling... the guy who developed the first accurate 
electronegativity scale for molecules... you think *he* might know a 
bit more about electronegativity than a moronic bleatfarting retard 
like you, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL

SPNAK!

Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?

<snicker>

> What's the electronegativity of oxygen, fakey?

See above, Spankard.

> Does that look like a +8?

Still trying to prove that PhD professor of applied sciences wrong,
eh, Moron? LOL

London South Bank University - Physics Department
Martin Chaplin BSc PhD CChem FRSC
Emeritus Professor of Applied Science
111 peer-reviewed studies published
3 books published
3 patents granted
<http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/water_molecule.html>
==================================================
Due to the relatively large positive charge on the oxygen atom nucleus 
(8+) and the closeness of its electrons, the oxygen atom attracts 
electrons much more strongly (i.e. is much more electronegative) than 
the hydrogen atoms (1+). This results in a charge transfer from the 
hydrogen atoms towards the oxygen atom and, hence, the polarity of the 
water molecule.

The molecule H2O has 10 electrons associated, 8 from the oxygen atom 
and one each from the two hydrogen atoms.
==================================================

So now you're denying that covalent bonds exist within water 
molecules... but you're far too stupid to know why you've just made 
that k'lame nor even that you'd tacitly made the claim.

Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed the water molecule had 2 positive 
poles and 2 negative poles? Yeah... yeah, you are.

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652496

Fakey wrote:

<snip petulant, incoherent concession speech>

Fakey: AF =  11.2 dB
Me:    AF = -14.4 dB

I win.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652518

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
<news:pcmcebh0ndatoggm5q4t0rfhbmnmveu1dq@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

> <snip petulant, incoherent concession speech>
> 
> Fakey: AF =  11.2 dB
> Me:    AF = -14.4 dB
> 
> I win.

Awww, look at the kooktard demonstrate just how much of a pwned
spankard he is... not only did he snip wholesale all that which kicked
his stupid ass (again), but I've got the moron counting lines and
calculating dB (again)... and he's just ramping up... that's his first
post of the night. He frothed and foamed all night long (again).

Hey, Moron... how about you catch yourself in your stoooopid lie about
using the total number of lines in a post to calculate dB... your
backpedal from being so pwned I've got you manually counting each and
every line of text I kick your stooopid ass with. LOL

SPNAK!

I win. Again.

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron. LOL

Why are you so stupid, Shiny Tinfoil Brain?

<snicker>

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652342

On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 06:54:58 +0100 (CET), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>You're blathering on about nuclear charge without knowing you're 
>actually blathering on about *effective* nuclear charge

<blink>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652168

In message <op.yd5pdbdhtm21m2@benson.localhost>, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle 
holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), 
socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" 
<root@127.0.0.1> writes
>
>

Maybe he just doesn't care ... I know I don't.

-- 
Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)

http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self
Compassion - Christopher Germer)

Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey)

"Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave
"Yads" Yaderley


#shitcanjillians

Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652183

Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
wrote:

> In message <op.yd5pdbdhtm21m2@benson.localhost>, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle 
> holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), 
> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" 
> <root@127.0.0.1> writes
> >
> >
> 
> Maybe he just doesn't care ... I know I don't.

Oh, he cares deeply and desperately.  Enough to froth, foam
& screed to Neptune and back.

You, as His Nips' new sycophantic sidekick, are required to
care, whether you want to or not.

You will now start caring.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652188

In message <csh7ebtvri0quq3a03u5kje9gbf77sdvqg@4ax.com>, Bite My Shiny 
Metal Ass <bender@the.future> writes
>Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
>wrote:
>
>> In message <op.yd5pdbdhtm21m2@benson.localhost>, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle
>> holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
>> <root@127.0.0.1> writes
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Maybe he just doesn't care ... I know I don't.
>
>Oh, he cares deeply and desperately.  Enough to froth, foam
>& screed to Neptune and back.
>
>You, as His Nips' new sycophantic sidekick, are required to
>care, whether you want to or not.
>
>You will now start caring.

I follow Fakey's orders ... not yours.

-- 
Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)

http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self
Compassion - Christopher Germer)

Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey)

"Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave
"Yads" Yaderley


#shitcanjillians

Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652190

Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
wrote:

> In message <csh7ebtvri0quq3a03u5kje9gbf77sdvqg@4ax.com>, Bite My Shiny 
> Metal Ass <bender@the.future> writes
> >Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> In message <op.yd5pdbdhtm21m2@benson.localhost>, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle
> >> holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> >> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
> >> <root@127.0.0.1> writes
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Maybe he just doesn't care ... I know I don't.
> >
> >Oh, he cares deeply and desperately.  Enough to froth, foam
> >& screed to Neptune and back.
> >
> >You, as His Nips' new sycophantic sidekick, are required to
> >care, whether you want to or not.
> >
> >You will now start caring.
> 
> I follow Fakey's orders ... not yours.

Hey!  I think he's gettin' it!
Can you say it with a little more vitriol?  Add a "fecking
nong" or a "moron", and a gratuitious screed-paste?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652192

In message <etk7eb5o96u232rrda8pcjbvm4ljbhm26k@4ax.com>, Bite My Shiny 
Metal Ass <bender@the.future> writes
>Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
>wrote:
>
>> In message <csh7ebtvri0quq3a03u5kje9gbf77sdvqg@4ax.com>, Bite My Shiny
>> Metal Ass <bender@the.future> writes
>> >Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> In message <op.yd5pdbdhtm21m2@benson.localhost>, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle
>> >> holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> >> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
>> >> <root@127.0.0.1> writes
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Maybe he just doesn't care ... I know I don't.
>> >
>> >Oh, he cares deeply and desperately.  Enough to froth, foam
>> >& screed to Neptune and back.
>> >
>> >You, as His Nips' new sycophantic sidekick, are required to
>> >care, whether you want to or not.
>> >
>> >You will now start caring.
>>
>> I follow Fakey's orders ... not yours.
>
>Hey!  I think he's gettin' it!
>Can you say it with a little more vitriol?  Add a "fecking
>nong" or a "moron", and a gratuitious screed-paste?

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*);

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms;

That superposition is the same as wave interference;

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves;

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things;

That RMS isn't a DC voltage;

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L;

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1;

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave;

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering;

What a positive or negative vector is;

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero;

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic";

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an
electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>


-- 
Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)

http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self
Compassion - Christopher Germer)

Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey)

"Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave
"Yads" Yaderley


#shitcanjillians

Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652193

Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
wrote:

> In message <etk7eb5o96u232rrda8pcjbvm4ljbhm26k@4ax.com>, Bite My Shiny 
> Metal Ass <bender@the.future> writes
> >Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> In message <csh7ebtvri0quq3a03u5kje9gbf77sdvqg@4ax.com>, Bite My Shiny
> >> Metal Ass <bender@the.future> writes
> >> >Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In message <op.yd5pdbdhtm21m2@benson.localhost>, "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle
> >> >> holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> >> >> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
> >> >> <root@127.0.0.1> writes
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Maybe he just doesn't care ... I know I don't.
> >> >
> >> >Oh, he cares deeply and desperately.  Enough to froth, foam
> >> >& screed to Neptune and back.
> >> >
> >> >You, as His Nips' new sycophantic sidekick, are required to
> >> >care, whether you want to or not.
> >> >
> >> >You will now start caring.
> >>
> >> I follow Fakey's orders ... not yours.
> >
> >Hey!  I think he's gettin' it!
> >Can you say it with a little more vitriol?  Add a "fecking
> >nong" or a "moron", and a gratuitious screed-paste?
> 
> -- 
> 
> Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
> =====================================
> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
> Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
> should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
> *sinusoids*);
> 
> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms;
> 
> That superposition is the same as wave interference;
> 
> That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves;
> 
> That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things;
> 
> That RMS isn't a DC voltage;
> 
> That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
> volts RMS L-L;
> 
> That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1;
> 
> The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave;
> 
> That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
> engineering, physics and control systems engineering;
> 
> What a positive or negative vector is;
> 
> That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
> Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero;
> 
> That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic";
> 
> That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
> positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.
> 
> That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an
> electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+.
> 
> That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge.
> 
> And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
> =====================================
> 
> SPNAK!
> 
> <snicker>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)
> 
> http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self
> Compassion - Christopher Germer)
> 
> Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey)
> 
> "Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave
> "Yads" Yaderley
> 
> 
> #shitcanjillians
> 
> Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time.

Wwwooooooooohoooooooooo!

This boy's a better fakey than fakey!

Watch out, auk.  There's a new kook in town.

Oh yeah... how bout a side of faglames?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652195

In message <07n7ebph8g0pt6q4httngk41dnud51qusa@4ax.com>, Bite My Shiny 
Metal Ass <bender@the.future> writes
>Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
>wrote:
>
>> In message <etk7eb5o96u232rrda8pcjbvm4ljbhm26k@4ax.com>, Bite My Shiny
>> Metal Ass <bender@the.future> writes
>> >Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> In message <csh7ebtvri0quq3a03u5kje9gbf77sdvqg@4ax.com>, Bite My Shiny
>> >> Metal Ass <bender@the.future> writes
>> >> >Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> In message <op.yd5pdbdhtm21m2@benson.localhost>, "\"Fakey's\" 
>> >> >>dogwhistle
>> >> >> holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop 
>> >> >>Jockey),
>> >> >> socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117"
>> >> >> <root@127.0.0.1> writes
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Maybe he just doesn't care ... I know I don't.
>> >> >
>> >> >Oh, he cares deeply and desperately.  Enough to froth, foam
>> >> >& screed to Neptune and back.
>> >> >
>> >> >You, as His Nips' new sycophantic sidekick, are required to
>> >> >care, whether you want to or not.
>> >> >
>> >> >You will now start caring.
>> >>
>> >> I follow Fakey's orders ... not yours.
>> >
>> >Hey!  I think he's gettin' it!
>> >Can you say it with a little more vitriol?  Add a "fecking
>> >nong" or a "moron", and a gratuitious screed-paste?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
>> =====================================
>> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
>> Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
>> should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
>> *sinusoids*);
>>
>> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms;
>>
>> That superposition is the same as wave interference;
>>
>> That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves;
>>
>> That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things;
>>
>> That RMS isn't a DC voltage;
>>
>> That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
>> volts RMS L-L;
>>
>> That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1;
>>
>> The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave;
>>
>> That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
>> engineering, physics and control systems engineering;
>>
>> What a positive or negative vector is;
>>
>> That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
>> Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero;
>>
>> That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic";
>>
>> That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
>> positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.
>>
>> That water does not have negative poles. The oxygen has an
>> electronegativity of 8+, the hydrogens 1+.
>>
>> That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* nucleal charge.
>>
>> And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
>> =====================================
>>
>> SPNAK!
>>
>> <snicker>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)
>>
>> http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self
>> Compassion - Christopher Germer)
>>
>> Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey)
>>
>> "Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave
>> "Yads" Yaderley
>>
>>
>> #shitcanjillians
>>
>> Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time.
>
>Wwwooooooooohoooooooooo!
>
>This boy's a better fakey than fakey!
>
>Watch out, auk.  There's a new kook in town.
>
>Oh yeah... how bout a side of faglames?

Faglames?

Would that make you and your bum-chum boyfriend feel more at home then?

-- 
Bill Jillians (Formosa'd by Checkmate)

http://www.mindfulselfcompassion.org/meditations_downloads.php (Mindful Self
Compassion - Christopher Germer)

Most Boring poster ever (along with Fakey)

"Better quality than Sw, MM, MSp, idlehands and Doctor WTF combined." Dave
"Yads" Yaderley


#shitcanjillians

Taking Over USENET 1 newsgroup at a time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652340

Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
wrote:

> In message <07n7ebph8g0pt6q4httngk41dnud51qusa@4ax.com>, Bite My Shiny 
> Metal Ass <bender@the.future> writes

> >Wwwooooooooohoooooooooo!
> >
> >This boy's a better fakey than fakey!
> >
> >Watch out, auk.  There's a new kook in town.
> >
> >Oh yeah... how bout a side of faglames?
> 
> Faglames?
> 
> Would that make you and your bum-chum boyfriend feel more at home then?

Yeeehaw!  Hey Skeeter, i got a faglame, and you didn't.

Neener, neener!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652345

On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:53:50 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass
<bender@the.future> wrote:

>Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
>wrote:
>
>> In message <07n7ebph8g0pt6q4httngk41dnud51qusa@4ax.com>, Bite My Shiny 
>> Metal Ass <bender@the.future> writes
>
>> >Wwwooooooooohoooooooooo!
>> >
>> >This boy's a better fakey than fakey!
>> >
>> >Watch out, auk.  There's a new kook in town.
>> >
>> >Oh yeah... how bout a side of faglames?
>> 
>> Faglames?
>> 
>> Would that make you and your bum-chum boyfriend feel more at home then?
>
>Yeeehaw!  Hey Skeeter, i got a faglame, and you didn't.
>
>Neener, neener!

Teh Faketard is afraid to faglame me, he hace been warned.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#652756

In message <2jaaebh3ip4qv1s1n54r9n6ki63n9q9l6h@4ax.com>, Bite My Shiny 
Metal Ass <bender@the.future> writes
>Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com>
>wrote:
>
>> In message <07n7ebph8g0pt6q4httngk41dnud51qusa@4ax.com>, Bite My Shiny
>> Metal Ass <bender@the.future> writes
>
>> >Wwwooooooooohoooooooooo!
>> >
>> >This boy's a better fakey than fakey!
>> >
>> >Watch out, auk.  There's a new kook in town.
>> >
>> >Oh yeah... how bout a side of faglames?
>>
>> Faglames?
>>
>> Would that make you and your bum-chum boyfriend feel more at home then?
>
>Yeeehaw!  Hey Skeeter, i got a faglame, and you didn't.
>
>Neener, neener!

People who don't ask don't get.

-- 
Bill Jillians

Maybe he is not well. Infirmity doth neglect all office. Whereto our health
is bound. We are not ourselves when nature, being oppressed, commands the mind
to suffer with the body.  I'll forbear, and am fallen out with my more headier
will.
- Lear- King Lear Act 2 Scene 2 by William Shakespeare.

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.usenet.kooks

csiph-web