Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.usage.english > #1145961 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-07-01 11:16 +0100 |
| Last post | 2026-07-05 06:34 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 309 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.usage.english
[OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-01 11:16 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-01 12:30 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-01 21:26 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-07-01 12:49 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-01 16:43 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-07-01 17:43 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-02 06:11 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-02 11:51 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-02 22:57 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-02 16:49 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-03 09:19 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-03 16:13 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-01 19:31 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-01 22:52 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2026-07-01 21:08 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-01 23:13 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-02 12:47 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-02 08:16 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-07-02 06:35 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-02 09:09 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-02 12:49 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Phil <phil@anonymous.invalid> - 2026-07-02 14:33 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-07-02 14:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Phil <phil@anonymous.invalid> - 2026-07-02 15:58 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-07-03 09:26 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-05 17:36 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-05 10:57 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-07-06 04:37 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-03 09:43 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-07-03 11:15 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! HVS <office@REMOVETHISwhhvs.co.uk> - 2026-07-06 10:54 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Charles Hope <clh@candehope.me.uk> - 2026-07-06 11:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-06 12:44 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) - 2026-07-06 14:49 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-06 11:30 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-07 10:56 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-07-07 07:21 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Ross Clark <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> - 2026-07-08 16:39 +1200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-07 11:30 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-07 11:27 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-02 16:12 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-02 17:33 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-02 19:21 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-02 23:26 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-04 11:38 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-04 12:52 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-02 08:26 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-06 20:22 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-02 13:33 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-07-02 05:50 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-02 14:33 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2026-07-02 08:23 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-02 12:47 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-02 12:56 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-02 23:09 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-02 15:06 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-03 09:57 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-03 11:48 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-03 09:58 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2026-07-02 10:22 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-02 12:04 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-02 13:35 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-02 09:39 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-01 16:46 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-01 13:51 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-03 09:58 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-03 14:28 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-03 17:47 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-03 17:48 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-03 17:50 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-01 13:55 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-01 17:06 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-01 17:15 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-01 19:20 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-02 06:11 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-01 19:19 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-01 23:10 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-02 09:30 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-02 17:50 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-02 13:00 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-02 13:43 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-02 12:34 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) - 2026-07-02 20:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-02 22:17 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-02 13:33 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-02 16:27 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-02 17:19 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-03 10:07 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-02 19:16 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2026-07-02 18:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-02 22:24 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-07-03 09:41 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-03 11:48 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-03 11:08 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Charles Hope <clh@candehope.me.uk> - 2026-07-03 11:45 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-03 15:58 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-03 15:58 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-03 16:06 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> - 2026-07-04 19:00 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-05 05:45 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-05 06:56 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-05 18:05 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> - 2026-07-05 11:30 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-05 20:32 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> - 2026-07-05 20:58 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-05 23:26 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-06 13:52 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-06 08:57 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-07 11:07 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-07 11:36 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-07 19:37 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-10 12:13 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-13 19:37 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-13 21:03 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-13 23:19 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-14 09:26 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-14 08:31 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-10 11:57 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-06 09:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-06 22:34 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-06 18:06 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-06 15:36 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2026-07-06 12:20 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-07-06 16:59 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-06 13:17 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-07 11:15 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-07-08 07:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) - 2026-07-06 18:48 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-07 11:42 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-06 18:08 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-06 13:34 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-06 19:12 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-06 16:31 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-06 23:24 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-06 19:11 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-07 11:17 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-07 06:38 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-07 08:59 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-07 16:43 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-07 16:27 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-08 06:23 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-08 06:43 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-08 08:09 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! HVS <office@REMOVETHISwhhvs.co.uk> - 2026-07-08 10:52 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-08 20:41 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-09 06:11 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-09 06:15 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-09 10:10 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-09 20:33 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-10 13:14 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-10 16:24 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-10 20:50 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-10 23:32 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-11 12:33 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-11 11:53 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-12 12:46 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-11 20:46 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-11 15:40 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-12 09:31 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-12 02:08 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-11 18:32 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-12 11:38 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-12 17:13 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-07-11 14:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-11 19:12 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-07-12 04:34 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2026-07-17 20:38 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-09 10:06 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-09 12:41 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-09 14:41 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-09 23:40 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-10 06:12 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-10 06:16 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-10 08:31 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-10 08:11 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-10 08:13 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-10 09:43 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-10 10:12 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-10 11:15 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-10 20:22 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-10 13:29 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-10 14:07 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-10 15:21 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-10 15:08 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-11 07:58 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-11 19:47 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-11 16:54 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) - 2026-07-12 01:53 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-11 19:50 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-11 23:31 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) - 2026-07-13 02:24 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-11 09:51 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-10 19:11 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-12 12:04 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-12 15:25 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-12 23:09 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-13 07:48 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-10 18:12 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-10 10:12 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-10 15:03 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-10 13:14 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-10 13:59 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-10 15:22 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-10 14:51 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-10 22:35 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-11 08:48 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-11 12:42 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-12 23:09 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-10 13:15 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-10 12:41 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-11 07:00 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-10 23:34 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-12 12:04 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-12 19:01 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-07-08 07:00 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-08 09:30 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-08 20:16 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-13 19:33 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-08 09:02 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-10 12:36 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-07-07 16:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-06 19:22 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-06 22:34 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) - 2026-07-06 22:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-07 00:50 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) - 2026-07-07 01:25 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-07 08:10 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-07 09:07 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2026-07-07 10:20 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-07 13:20 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-07 13:49 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-07 11:52 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2026-07-07 09:05 -0400
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-07-07 20:12 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-07 11:50 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-07 19:47 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2026-07-10 11:38 -0700
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2026-07-06 15:38 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-06 15:30 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-05 17:59 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-05 11:01 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-05 10:45 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-05 12:27 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-05 20:59 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-05 15:27 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-05 15:47 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-06 06:32 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-06 07:54 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-06 07:54 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-06 09:59 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-06 13:52 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> - 2026-07-05 12:21 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-06 08:53 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-03 09:58 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-02 09:24 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-02 17:55 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-02 16:29 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-02 10:24 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-07-02 05:56 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-02 12:47 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-07-03 08:51 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-02 13:44 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2026-07-05 18:07 +1000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-03 11:16 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-03 15:12 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-03 14:29 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-03 16:08 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-03 20:57 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! athel.cb@gmail.com <user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid> - 2026-07-03 19:10 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-03 20:50 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-05 19:01 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) - 2026-07-05 19:05 +0000
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Adam Funk <a24061@ducksburg.com> - 2026-07-07 19:54 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-06 06:24 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-06 06:27 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-12 23:37 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-13 07:42 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-13 16:35 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-13 19:08 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-14 10:49 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-14 11:22 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-14 15:45 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Phil <phil@anonymous.invalid> - 2026-07-05 20:27 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-07-04 06:50 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-02 12:47 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-02 13:54 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-02 14:33 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-02 16:54 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-02 17:45 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-03 16:21 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-03 11:16 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-12 20:54 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> - 2026-07-12 20:58 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-12 23:09 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> - 2026-07-12 21:12 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-12 23:09 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-03 11:16 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-03 16:20 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2026-07-05 08:33 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> - 2026-07-01 19:13 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2026-07-02 05:45 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-03 11:52 +0800
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-03 07:15 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-03 07:49 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-03 16:22 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-04 06:38 +0100
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2026-07-04 21:37 +0200
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-05 13:13 +0800
Re: [OT] Don't blink or you'll miss one! Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2026-07-05 06:34 +0100
Page 5 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 16 Next page →
| From | "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-02 13:43 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nan165F6idsU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #1146013 |
On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 17:50:03 +1000, Peter Moylan wrote: > On 02/07/26 17:30, Bertel Lund Hansen wrote: > > > What does "repeat" mean in this context? > IIRC the word is "rappel" in French, meaning "reminder". 50 (rappel) > means that the limit was already 50, but they're telling you again in > case you missed the last sign. I wouldn't say that. IMO it's a statement telling you it's still 50, like the last sign you didn't miss. ;-) -- s|b
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-02 12:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mn.12f27ea75e2ed0b1.127094@snitoo> |
| In reply to | #1146029 |
On Thursday or thereabouts, s|b asked ... > On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 17:50:03 +1000, Peter Moylan wrote: > >> On 02/07/26 17:30, Bertel Lund Hansen wrote: >> >>> What does "repeat" mean in this context? > >> IIRC the word is "rappel" in French, meaning "reminder". 50 (rappel) >> means that the limit was already 50, but they're telling you again in >> case you missed the last sign. > > I wouldn't say that. IMO it's a statement telling you it's still 50, > like the last sign you didn't miss. ;-) So far as I know from the examples I've seen, in the US both signs are just "50" and indistinguishable. The second sign is apt to be after a junction, probably a major junction. /dps -- The presence of this syntax results from the fact that SQLite is really a Tcl extension that has escaped into the wild. <http://www.sqlite.org/lang_expr.html>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-02 20:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1126j2d$vbt$1@usenet.csail.mit.edu> |
| In reply to | #1146070 |
In article <mn.12f27ea75e2ed0b1.127094@snitoo>, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thursday or thereabouts, s|b asked ... >> I wouldn't say that. IMO it's a statement telling you it's still 50, >> like the last sign you didn't miss. ;-) > >So far as I know from the examples I've seen, in the US both signs are >just "50" and indistinguishable. The second sign is apt to be after a >junction, probably a major junction. For route marker assemblies, that's called a "confirmation marker", but I don't know if there's a name for the analogous speed-limit sign. It's the same R2-1 sign either way, and MUTCD at least doesn't seem to distinguish these repeat speed-limit signs from those that are posted at the beginning of a speed zone. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | "Act to avoid constraining the future; if you can, wollman@bimajority.org| act to remove constraint from the future. This is Opinions not shared by| a thing you can do, are able to do, to do together." my employers. | - Graydon Saunders, _A Succession of Bad Days_ (2015)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-02 22:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <szA1S.3$vPn3.0@fx16.ams1> |
| In reply to | #1146070 |
On 02/07/2026 20:34, Snidely wrote: > On Thursday or thereabouts, s|b asked ... >> On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 17:50:03 +1000, Peter Moylan wrote: >> >>> On 02/07/26 17:30, Bertel Lund Hansen wrote: >>> >>>> What does "repeat" mean in this context? >> >>> IIRC the word is "rappel" in French, meaning "reminder". 50 (rappel) >>> means that the limit was already 50, but they're telling you again in >>> case you missed the last sign. >> >> I wouldn't say that. IMO it's a statement telling you it's still 50, >> like the last sign you didn't miss. ;-) > > So far as I know from the examples I've seen, in the US both signs are > just "50" and indistinguishable. The second sign is apt to be after a > junction, probably a major junction. The UK doesn't use "rappel". However the speed sign at the start of the limit is large and 'repeat' signs are smaller. -- Sam Plusnet
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-02 13:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nan45fF71euU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #1146013 |
Le 02/07/2026 à 08:50, Peter Moylan a écrit : > On 02/07/26 17:30, Bertel Lund Hansen wrote: >> Den 01.07.2026 kl. 23.10 skrev wugi: >>> >>> Another classic is: announcing "70", and the next one a few hundred >>> meters later: "50 (repeat)". >> >> What does "repeat" mean in this context? > > IIRC the word is "rappel" in French, meaning "reminder". 50 (rappel) > means that the limit was already 50, but they're telling you again in > case you missed the last sign. The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless signs impose a different limit. Simples! "The Department has no plans to update legislation to allow 30mph speed limit repeater signs on roads with street lighting. Repeater signing is not used on street lit roads subject to a 30mph speed limit because the lamp columns act as the repeaters. Guidance is provided in rule 124 of the Highway Code. This has been law for over 70 years and all drivers are required to learn this in order to pass their driving test" - <https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-12-01/95755>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bertel Lund Hansen <rundtosset@lundhansen.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-02 16:27 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1125sh7$2l3fn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1146032 |
Den 02.07.2026 kl. 14.33 skrev Hibou: > The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than > 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless > signs impose a different limit. Simples! In Denmark the 50 km/h limit is announced when you enter a city, town or village. No reminders. Here's an example: https://dinavis.dk/samfund/ECE14684614/flyttet-byskilt-giver-hoejere-fart-i-landsby/ Outside towns there are only signs with a number unless old signs have survived: https://www.magacin.dk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/60-kmt.jpg.webp They will be repeated if necessary with irregular intervals, sometimes a kilometer. I sometimes I see illogical signs like a sign disabling a limit of 70 km/h ten meters before a town-sign meaning "50 km/h". -- Bertel, Kolt, Danmark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-02 17:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nanhcaF94dqU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #1146042 |
Le 02/07/2026 à 15:27, Bertel Lund Hansen a écrit : > Den 02.07.2026 kl. 14.33 skrev Hibou: >> >> The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than >> 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless >> signs impose a different limit. Simples! > > In Denmark the 50 km/h limit is announced when you enter a city, town or > village. No reminders. [...] Aye, well, 'sensible' was a wee bitty tongue-in-cheek, right enough.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-03 10:07 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <1126ufb$31a2h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #1146042 |
On 03/07/26 00:27, Bertel Lund Hansen wrote: > > I sometimes I see illogical signs like a sign disabling a limit of 70 > km/h ten meters before a town-sign meaning "50 km/h". There's a main road near me where the limit is 70 km/h, dropping to 60 near busy intersections. But the road passes a school, and the limit near schools is 40 (at certain times of day). So there's one stretch, not far from our house, where the limit goes from 60 to 40, then back to 60 for about fifty metres, and then back to 70. -- Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org Newcastle, NSW
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-02 19:16 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9Wx1S.2$ZV0f.0@fx09.ams1> |
| In reply to | #1146032 |
On 02/07/2026 13:33, Hibou wrote: > Le 02/07/2026 à 08:50, Peter Moylan a écrit : >> On 02/07/26 17:30, Bertel Lund Hansen wrote: >>> Den 01.07.2026 kl. 23.10 skrev wugi: >>>> >>>> Another classic is: announcing "70", and the next one a few hundred >>>> meters later: "50 (repeat)". >>> >>> What does "repeat" mean in this context? >> >> IIRC the word is "rappel" in French, meaning "reminder". 50 (rappel) >> means that the limit was already 50, but they're telling you again in >> case you missed the last sign. > > > The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than > 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless > signs impose a different limit. Simples! > > "The Department has no plans to update legislation to allow 30mph speed > limit repeater signs on roads with street lighting. Repeater signing is > not used on street lit roads subject to a 30mph speed limit because the > lamp columns act as the repeaters. Guidance is provided in rule 124 of > the Highway Code. This has been law for over 70 years and all drivers > are required to learn this in order to pass their driving test" - > <https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/ > detail/2025-12-01/95755> > Objection M'Lud! 'Round 'ere that limit is more likely to be 20mph - but I agree about the foolishness of such a scheme for determining the speed limit. If this scheme was adopted in a number of other countries, I wonder if new cars would have some feature which attempted to identify street lamps, and measure the interval between them? -- Sam Plusnet
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-02 18:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1126b57$p6vv$1@artemis.inf.ed.ac.uk> |
| In reply to | #1146063 |
In article <9Wx1S.2$ZV0f.0@fx09.ams1>, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote: >> The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than >> 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless >> signs impose a different limit. Simples! [...] >Objection M'Lud! 'Round 'ere that limit is more likely to be 20mph - >but I agree about the foolishness of such a scheme for determining the >speed limit. Overruled. That's just an example of the quoted rule - where the limit is 20 rather then 30, you should find regular signs for it. When it changes from 20 to 30, there's one sign then no reminders. Reminders aren't marked as such, but are usually smaller. -- Richard
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-02 22:24 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <TFA1S.2$_Off.1@fx12.ams1> |
| In reply to | #1146068 |
On 02/07/2026 19:37, Richard Tobin wrote: > In article <9Wx1S.2$ZV0f.0@fx09.ams1>, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote: > >>> The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than >>> 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless >>> signs impose a different limit. Simples! > > [...] > >> Objection M'Lud! 'Round 'ere that limit is more likely to be 20mph - >> but I agree about the foolishness of such a scheme for determining the >> speed limit. > > Overruled. That's just an example of the quoted rule - where the > limit is 20 rather then 30, you should find regular signs for it. > When it changes from 20 to 30, there's one sign then no reminders. I note your use of "should". When the 20mph limits were introduced here (Wales) a large number of those signs[1] were either painted out or turned around so they were not visible. That was 3 years ago and most are still in that state. [1] Comment limited to those signs I encounter.> > Reminders aren't marked as such, but are usually smaller. -- Sam Plusnet
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-03 09:41 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20260703094105.3153e78e1c2f3b8bf28df604@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #1146074 |
On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 22:24:02 +0100 Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote: > On 02/07/2026 19:37, Richard Tobin wrote: > > In article <9Wx1S.2$ZV0f.0@fx09.ams1>, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote: > > > >>> The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than > >>> 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless > >>> signs impose a different limit. Simples! > > > > [...] > > > >> Objection M'Lud! 'Round 'ere that limit is more likely to be 20mph - > >> but I agree about the foolishness of such a scheme for determining the > >> speed limit. > > > > Overruled. That's just an example of the quoted rule - where the > > limit is 20 rather then 30, you should find regular signs for it. > > When it changes from 20 to 30, there's one sign then no reminders. > > I note your use of "should". > When the 20mph limits were introduced here (Wales) a large number of > those signs[1] were either painted out or turned around so they were not > visible. That was 3 years ago and most are still in that state. > > [1] Comment limited to those signs I encounter.> > > Reminders aren't marked as such, but are usually smaller. > They're a wild lot up in them thar hills. Our road is on a straight section with a 20 limit. We get the occasional delivery van and a few teachers doing 20 or below. Most do c.28, the loons up the hill (other hills are readily available around here) usually go at c.37, with the odd extreme idiot doing 50+. We did look into getting the council to install a speedcam after our car was smashed into, but it's a lot of faff. -- Bah, and indeed Humbug.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-03 11:48 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1rxo5ec.1rs1ftu1vmlosjN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #1146068 |
Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > In article <9Wx1S.2$ZV0f.0@fx09.ams1>, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote: > > >> The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than > >> 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless > >> signs impose a different limit. Simples! > > [...] > > >Objection M'Lud! 'Round 'ere that limit is more likely to be 20mph - > >but I agree about the foolishness of such a scheme for determining the > >speed limit. > > Overruled. That's just an example of the quoted rule - where the > limit is 20 rather then 30, you should find regular signs for it. > When it changes from 20 to 30, there's one sign then no reminders. Practice in these parts is that speed limits should be recognisable to motorists by the structure of the road. (so the presence of bumps, chicanes, or wide bicycle paths) Simply changing road signs to read 30 instead of 50 won't do, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-03 11:08 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1rxo42i.l8roa21xg6mmoN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> |
| In reply to | #1146114 |
J. J. Lodder <nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> wrote: > Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > > > In article <9Wx1S.2$ZV0f.0@fx09.ams1>, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote: > > > > >> The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than > > >> 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless > > >> signs impose a different limit. Simples! > > > > [...] > > > > >Objection M'Lud! 'Round 'ere that limit is more likely to be 20mph - > > >but I agree about the foolishness of such a scheme for determining the > > >speed limit. > > > > Overruled. That's just an example of the quoted rule - where the > > limit is 20 rather then 30, you should find regular signs for it. > > When it changes from 20 to 30, there's one sign then no reminders. > > Practice in these parts is that speed limits should be recognisable > to motorists by the structure of the road. > (so the presence of bumps, chicanes, or wide bicycle paths) That wouldn't work in England. All roads have bumps of some description; in towns and villages there are dozens of chicaines created by badly-parked cars and there are hardly any bicycle paths along roads because we don't have many bicycle users. -- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charles Hope <clh@candehope.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-03 11:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cnjkhm-362b.ln1@newsauth.orpheusnet.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #1146121 |
On 03/07/2026 11:08, Liz Tuddenham wrote: > J. J. Lodder <nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> wrote: > >> Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote: >> >>> In article <9Wx1S.2$ZV0f.0@fx09.ams1>, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than >>>>> 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless >>>>> signs impose a different limit. Simples! >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> Objection M'Lud! 'Round 'ere that limit is more likely to be 20mph - >>>> but I agree about the foolishness of such a scheme for determining the >>>> speed limit. >>> >>> Overruled. That's just an example of the quoted rule - where the >>> limit is 20 rather then 30, you should find regular signs for it. >>> When it changes from 20 to 30, there's one sign then no reminders. >> >> Practice in these parts is that speed limits should be recognisable >> to motorists by the structure of the road. >> (so the presence of bumps, chicanes, or wide bicycle paths) > > That wouldn't work in England. All roads have bumps of some > description; in towns and villages there are dozens of chicaines created > by badly-parked cars and there are hardly any bicycle paths along roads > because we don't have many bicycle users. > when I learned to drive (late 1950s), there were only 2 speed limits: 30 mph in built-up areas ans 20mph in Royal Parks (Arthur's Sat, Edinburgh, in my case). Then they wanted to turn Park Lane, London, into a dual carriageway. The northbound lane is in Hyde Park! So, the Royal Park speed limit became 30mph - even in Edinburgh Since then, we now have speed limits of 20mph, 30mph, 40mpg 50 mph , 60 mph & 70mph, Very confusing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-03 15:58 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1rxocxw.1o0dmm05q8tt2N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #1146127 |
Charles Hope <clh@candehope.me.uk> wrote: > On 03/07/2026 11:08, Liz Tuddenham wrote: > > J. J. Lodder <nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> wrote: > > > >> Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > >> > >>> In article <9Wx1S.2$ZV0f.0@fx09.ams1>, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than > >>>>> 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless > >>>>> signs impose a different limit. Simples! > >>> > >>> [...] > >>> > >>>> Objection M'Lud! 'Round 'ere that limit is more likely to be 20mph - > >>>> but I agree about the foolishness of such a scheme for determining the > >>>> speed limit. > >>> > >>> Overruled. That's just an example of the quoted rule - where the > >>> limit is 20 rather then 30, you should find regular signs for it. > >>> When it changes from 20 to 30, there's one sign then no reminders. > >> > >> Practice in these parts is that speed limits should be recognisable > >> to motorists by the structure of the road. > >> (so the presence of bumps, chicanes, or wide bicycle paths) > > > > That wouldn't work in England. All roads have bumps of some > > description; in towns and villages there are dozens of chicaines created > > by badly-parked cars and there are hardly any bicycle paths along roads > > because we don't have many bicycle users. > > > when I learned to drive (late 1950s), there were only 2 speed limits: 30 > mph in built-up areas ans 20mph in Royal Parks (Arthur's Sat, Edinburgh, > in my case). Then they wanted to turn Park Lane, London, into a dual > carriageway. The northbound lane is in Hyde Park! So, the Royal Park > speed limit became 30mph - even in Edinburgh Google tries to tell me that this is from long ago. The speed limit is back to 20, one of the lanes is bus only, and there is a bidirectional bicycle path. (mostly broken up) Edinburgh would be Arthur's Seat, I presume? Google tells me that Queen's Drive around it is also back to 20. (and with a bicycle and foot path) > Since then, we now have speed limits of 20mph, 30mph, 40mpg 50 mph , 60 > mph & 70mph, Very confusing. Yes, crazy, Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-03 15:58 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1rxoc0y.13zh534m6b6xcN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> |
| In reply to | #1146121 |
Liz Tuddenham <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote: > J. J. Lodder <nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> wrote: > > > Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > > > > > In article <9Wx1S.2$ZV0f.0@fx09.ams1>, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than > > > >> 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless > > > >> signs impose a different limit. Simples! > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > >Objection M'Lud! 'Round 'ere that limit is more likely to be 20mph - > > > >but I agree about the foolishness of such a scheme for determining the > > > >speed limit. > > > > > > Overruled. That's just an example of the quoted rule - where the > > > limit is 20 rather then 30, you should find regular signs for it. > > > When it changes from 20 to 30, there's one sign then no reminders. > > > > Practice in these parts is that speed limits should be recognisable > > to motorists by the structure of the road. > > (so the presence of bumps, chicanes, or wide bicycle paths) > > That wouldn't work in England. All roads have bumps of some > description; in towns and villages there are dozens of chicaines created > by badly-parked cars and there are hardly any bicycle paths along roads > because we don't have many bicycle users. Isn't the problem that there is hardly money for road maintenance to begin with? (let alone for reconstruction?) Richard's point is valid, I think. The apearance of a road and the speed limit on it should be in harmony in a way that users understand intuitively. Imposing arbitrary speed limits on roads that look like they were designed for more speed just doesn't work. (except for generating tax income) The practice may be different... Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-03 16:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1rxohaj.ianhnvq4lwjjN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> |
| In reply to | #1146136 |
J. J. Lodder <nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> wrote: > Liz Tuddenham <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote: > > > J. J. Lodder <nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> wrote: > > > > > Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > In article <9Wx1S.2$ZV0f.0@fx09.ams1>, Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than > > > > >> 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless > > > > >> signs impose a different limit. Simples! > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > >Objection M'Lud! 'Round 'ere that limit is more likely to be 20mph - > > > > >but I agree about the foolishness of such a scheme for determining the > > > > >speed limit. > > > > > > > > Overruled. That's just an example of the quoted rule - where the > > > > limit is 20 rather then 30, you should find regular signs for it. > > > > When it changes from 20 to 30, there's one sign then no reminders. > > > > > > Practice in these parts is that speed limits should be recognisable > > > to motorists by the structure of the road. > > > (so the presence of bumps, chicanes, or wide bicycle paths) > > > > That wouldn't work in England. All roads have bumps of some > > description; in towns and villages there are dozens of chicaines created > > by badly-parked cars and there are hardly any bicycle paths along roads > > because we don't have many bicycle users. > > Isn't the problem that there is hardly money > for road maintenance to begin with? (let alone for reconstruction?) I hace heard that damage to roads increases with vehicle weight, so electic cars are causing a lot of the problem. Continuous rain during the last Winter hasn't helped: pneumatic tyres act like pistons and force the water into any small cracks, which enlarges them to the point where the road surface begins to delaminate from the base. > Richard's point is valid, I think. > The apearance of a road and the speed limit on it > should be in harmony in a way that users understand intuitively. > Imposing arbitrary speed limits on roads that look > like they were designed for more speed just doesn't work. > (except for generating tax income) I have a cynical view of this: In England, local taxes are paid into a central government pot and then returned to those local councils who best meet the central government's objectives. If the council doesn't do what it is told, it won't receive any funding. In a desparate scramble for funds, the local councils have to satisfy central government demand for ever-more-severe traffic restricting measures. Each year the council needs to produce a list of driver-infuriating measure it has taken in the name of "road safety", so it puts in 30 mph limits where they eran't needed, then changes parts of them to 20 mph the following year - then changes some more the next year ...and so on. Bath has nearly run out of places to put traffic lights so they are now putting pointless speed humps in places where speeding isn't a problem. They do, hovever get a substantial income from speed (revenue) cameras and a draconian force of traffic wardens who enforce parking restictions that were put in, despite the local residents opposing them tooth and nail for years. -- ~ Liz Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-04 19:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <27209.19008.130402.226297@parhasard.net> |
| In reply to | #1146032 |
Ar an dara lá de mí Iúil, scríobh Hibou: > [...] The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than > 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless signs > impose a different limit. Simples! > > "The Department has no plans to update legislation to allow 30mph speed > limit repeater signs on roads with street lighting. Repeater signing is not > used on street lit roads subject to a 30mph speed limit because the lamp > columns act as the repeaters. Guidance is provided in rule 124 of the > Highway Code. This has been law for over 70 years and all drivers are > required to learn this in order to pass their driving test" - > <https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-12-01/95755> I occasionally drive in the UK and learned this from you right now. Now, I will likely be working on the assumption that the limit is 30 mph in such an area, but their are plenty of people driving in the UK who never passed a UK driving test, it seems a weak argument for a reasonable request. -- ‘As I sat looking up at the Guinness ad, I could never figure out / How your man stayed up on the surfboard after fourteen pints of stout’ (C. Moore)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-05 05:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nau5rgFa5osU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #1146210 |
Le 04/07/2026 à 19:00, Aidan Kehoe a écrit : > Ar an dara lá de mí Iúil, scríobh Hibou: > > > [...] The sensible British rule is that if there are street lamps less than > > 200 yards apart, the limit is 30 mph. No need for a 'rappel' unless signs > > impose a different limit. Simples! > > > > "The Department has no plans to update legislation to allow 30mph speed > > limit repeater signs on roads with street lighting. Repeater signing is not > > used on street lit roads subject to a 30mph speed limit because the lamp > > columns act as the repeaters. Guidance is provided in rule 124 of the > > Highway Code. This has been law for over 70 years and all drivers are > > required to learn this in order to pass their driving test" - > > <https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-12-01/95755> > > I occasionally drive in the UK and learned this from you right now. Now, I will > likely be working on the assumption that the limit is 30 mph in such an area, > but their are plenty of people driving in the UK who never passed a UK driving > test, it seems a weak argument for a reasonable request. It's probably asking too much to expect visiting drivers to read the Highway Code (though it is available free-of-charge here: <https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code>). Apart from anything else, it has become indigestible - 310 rules now, many of them long-winded. I have a copy from 1966 which contains only 94 rules (it did cost a tanner, so wasn't such good value).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.usage.english
csiph-web