Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.os.linux > #38879 > unrolled thread

When will Linux finally support double clicking?

Back to article view | Back to alt.os.linux

Contents

  When will Linux finally support double clicking? tmelmosfire@gmail.com - 2016-09-16 17:09 -0700
    Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2016-09-16 19:36 -0500
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? tmelmosfire@gmail.com - 2016-09-16 18:50 -0700
    Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? /less <roam@noabode.nil> - 2016-09-17 01:07 +0700
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? tmelmosfire@gmail.com - 2016-09-16 18:51 -0700
    Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-09-17 01:12 +0000
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? tmelmosfire@gmail.com - 2016-09-16 18:54 -0700
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2016-09-17 05:39 +0200
        Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? tmelmosfire@gmail.com - 2016-09-16 21:49 -0700
        Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-09-17 13:46 +0100
          Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-17 14:01 +0000
          Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2016-09-17 18:44 +0200
            Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-17 10:14 -0700
            Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-09-17 20:07 +0000
              Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? jrg <connyank@cox.net> - 2016-09-17 14:18 -0700
          Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-09-17 20:06 +0000
            Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-17 13:37 -0700
    Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Dan C <youmustbejoking@lan.invalid> - 2016-09-17 01:49 +0000
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? tmelmosfire@gmail.com - 2016-09-16 18:55 -0700
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? tmelmosfire@gmail.com - 2016-09-16 18:55 -0700
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-17 07:09 -0400
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Yrrah <Yrrah-aol@aol.invalid> - 2016-09-17 14:16 +0200
        Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2016-09-17 18:48 +0200
          Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2016-09-17 22:11 +0200
            Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-17 22:19 +0200
              Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2016-09-18 01:03 +0200
                Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-17 23:30 +0000
            Changing topics .... (was:- Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking?) Daniel60 <Daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2016-10-16 18:54 +1100
              Re: Changing topics .... Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-10-16 10:38 +0100
                Re: Changing topics .... William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-10-16 11:23 +0000
                  Re: Changing topics .... "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-10-16 13:46 +0200
                    Re: Changing topics .... William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-10-16 11:59 +0000
                      Re: Changing topics .... "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-10-16 14:25 +0200
                        Re: Changing topics .... Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-10-17 11:35 +0000
                          Re: Changing topics .... Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2016-10-17 22:48 +0000
                          Re: Changing topics .... "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-10-18 01:57 +0200
                            Re: Changing topics .... Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-10-18 04:22 +0000
                              Re: Changing topics .... Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-10-18 06:20 -0400
                                Re: Changing topics .... "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-10-18 12:30 +0200
                      Spoil Sports!! Re: Changing topics .... Daniel60 <Daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2016-10-16 23:32 +1100
                        Re: Spoil Sports!! Re: Changing topics .... Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-10-16 14:01 +0100
                          Re: Spoil Sports!! Re: Changing topics .... "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@invalid.es> - 2016-10-16 15:46 +0200
    Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2016-09-17 08:04 +0200
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? tmelmosfire@gmail.com - 2016-09-17 00:23 -0700
        Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-17 15:04 +0200
    Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-17 11:20 +0200
    Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Darklight <nglennglen@netscape.net> - 2016-09-17 13:00 +0100
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-17 10:12 -0700
    Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-09-17 23:12 +0000
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-17 18:12 -0700
    Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Robert Newson <nothanks@bullet3.fsnet.oc.ku> - 2016-09-22 21:33 +0100
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-23 02:03 +0000
        Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-22 19:20 -0700
        Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? jrg <connyank@cox.net> - 2016-09-22 20:48 -0700
          Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-22 21:25 -0700
        Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Robert Newson <nothanks@bullet3.fsnet.oc.ku> - 2016-09-23 19:31 +0100
          Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-23 13:56 -0700
          Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? jrg <connyank@cox.net> - 2016-09-23 14:51 -0700
        Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? tmelmosfire@gmail.com - 2016-09-23 21:05 -0700
          Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-24 04:15 +0000
            Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? tmelmosfire@gmail.com - 2016-09-24 00:58 -0700
            Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 20:34 +0000
    Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Marek Novotny <mareknovotry@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 17:20 -0700
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 18:07 -0700
    Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Marek Novotny <mareknovotry@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 18:20 -0700
      Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 02:16 +0000
        Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 19:19 -0700
          Re: When will Linux finally support double clicking? Marek Novotny <mareknovotry@gmail.com> - 2016-09-24 19:22 -0700

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

#39497 — Re: Spoil Sports!! Re: Changing topics ....

On 2016-10-16, Daniel60 <Daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
> On 16/10/2016 10:59 PM, William Unruh wrote:
>> On 2016-10-16, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@invalid.es> wrote:
>>> On 2016-10-16 13:23, William Unruh wrote:
>>>> On 2016-10-16, Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> Daniel60 <Daniel47@eternal-september.org> writes:
>>>>>> On 18/09/2016 6:11 AM, J.O. Aho wrote:
>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>> Space rocket straight into the sun...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've often wondered why this is not the process used to dispose of
>>>>>> spent Nuclear rods from reactors!! After all, the Sun *is* just one
>>>>>> big Nuclear Reactor!! (O.K. Fusion v Fission, but .... !)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure, great care would have to be taken getting the spent rods to
>>>>>> rocket launch sites and then ensure that the rockets make it into
>>>>>> space and then on, on into the Sun.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And the process would cost a mint, but .............!
>>>>>
>>>>> The earth is moving *fast*; to go ???straight into the sun??? you need to
>>>>> dump all that speed.  Fantastically expensive compared to a broad range
>>>>> of other astronomical destinations.
>>>
>>> It would be "spiralling down into"...
>>
>> Depends on how rapidly you "dump all that speed". Certainly the most
>> efficient way is to "spiral down" or use the other planets (Venus,
>> mercury) to assist. But that has the danger of crashing the rocket into
>> those planets-- cosmic pollution.
>>
>>>
>>>> The bigger problem is "Sure, great care would have to be taken..." Space
>>>> launch is tricky and dangerous, and even one rocket crash would be a
>>>> huge disaster. Make Chernobile look like a sunday school picnic. There
>>>> is no fallback. Burying it is far far safer.
>>>
>>> Even launching a exploring mission with a nuclear battery rises a lot of
>>> concerns and protests. And it is what is needed to go into the far solar
>>> planets.
>
> Thanks for responding, guys, even if you have all dashed my dreams!! ;-(
>
> Daniel

If it's still radio-active then it's really still fuel; we should be
building things that can use that fuel safely, not trying to hide it.
The difficulty is political not technical, as the route to bombs is too
close to the route to efficient fission power stations.  Look at what
the USA did when Iran tried.

-- 
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
--  Whiskers 
-- ~~~~~~~~~~

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39498 — Re: Spoil Sports!! Re: Changing topics ....

On 2016-10-16 15:01, Whiskers wrote:
> On 2016-10-16, Daniel60 <Daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>> On 16/10/2016 10:59 PM, William Unruh wrote:
>>> On 2016-10-16, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@invalid.es> wrote:
>>>> On 2016-10-16 13:23, William Unruh wrote:


>>>>> The bigger problem is "Sure, great care would have to be taken..." Space
>>>>> launch is tricky and dangerous, and even one rocket crash would be a
>>>>> huge disaster. Make Chernobile look like a sunday school picnic. There
>>>>> is no fallback. Burying it is far far safer.
>>>>
>>>> Even launching a exploring mission with a nuclear battery rises a lot of
>>>> concerns and protests. And it is what is needed to go into the far solar
>>>> planets.
>>
>> Thanks for responding, guys, even if you have all dashed my dreams!! ;-(
>>
>> Daniel
> 
> If it's still radio-active then it's really still fuel; we should be
> building things that can use that fuel safely, not trying to hide it.
> The difficulty is political not technical, as the route to bombs is too
> close to the route to efficient fission power stations.  Look at what
> the USA did when Iran tried.

Absolutely.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#38897

On 09/17/2016 02:09 AM, tmelmosfire@gmail.com wrote:
> I recently read:
> 
>   Peter Köhlmann:
>     ------
>     So you start with a "feature" [double clicking] which is used in
>     OSX and windows, but *not* in linux.
>     ------
> 
> When, if ever, will Linux ever support double clicking and be able to use
> it in pretty much any program? Seems that is a pretty basic thing and it is hard to believe Linux is that far behind OS X and Windows.

It's a configuration option which is by default disabled.
In this concern microsoft windows is far behind, as you can't disable
double click.

PS. When trolling, you should not include the instructions for your
trolling in your post.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#38900

On Saturday, 17 September 2016 06:04:46 UTC, J.O. Aho  wrote:
> On 09/17/2016 02:09 AM, tmelmosfire@gmail.com wrote:
> > I recently read:
> > 
> >   Peter Köhlmann:
> >     ------
> >     So you start with a "feature" [double clicking] which is used in
> >     OSX and windows, but *not* in linux.
> >     ------
> > 
> > When, if ever, will Linux ever support double clicking and be able to use
> > it in pretty much any program? Seems that is a pretty basic thing and it is hard to believe Linux is that far behind OS X and Windows.
> 
> It's a configuration option which is by default disabled.

Sounds like you are thinking only of the file manager and opening files. I suspect Peter made that same mistake but even then Linux still has it to be used.

> In this concern microsoft windows is far behind, as you can't disable
> double click.

You are arguing Linux handles double click better. Peter argued it did not have the feature at all. Even someone who has his file manager set to open on single click should know better.

> PS. When trolling, you should not include the instructions for your
> trolling in your post.

Thanks! I will keep in mind! Wow, you must be an expert at trolling!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#38906

The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser (tmelmosfire@gmail.com) babbled:

> On Saturday, 17 September 2016 06:04:46 UTC, J.O. Aho  wrote:
>> On 09/17/2016 02:09 AM, tmelmosfire@gmail.com wrote:
>> > I recently read:
>> > 
>> >   Peter Köhlmann:
>> >     ------
>> >     So you start with a "feature" [double clicking] which is used in
>> >     OSX and windows, but *not* in linux.
>> >     ------
>> > 
>> > When, if ever, will Linux ever support double clicking and be able to
>> > use it in pretty much any program? Seems that is a pretty basic thing
>> > and it is hard to believe Linux is that far behind OS X and Windows.
>> 
>> It's a configuration option which is by default disabled.
> 
> Sounds like you are thinking only of the file manager and opening files. I
> suspect Peter made that same mistake but even then Linux still has it to
> be used.
> 
>> In this concern microsoft windows is far behind, as you can't disable
>> double click.
> 
> You are arguing Linux handles double click better. Peter argued it did not
> have the feature at all. 

Lying imbecile. Add that post as another of your "quoteable lies",  you 
stinking piece of dreck

> Even someone who has his file manager set to open
> on single click should know better.

Everyone knows better than you, lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser

>> PS. When trolling, you should not include the instructions for your
>> trolling in your post.
> 
> Thanks! I will keep in mind! Wow, you must be an expert at trolling!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#38901

The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser (tmelmosfire@gmail.com) babbled:

> I recently read:
> 
>   Peter Köhlmann:
>     ------
>     So you start with a "feature" [double clicking] which is used in
>     OSX and windows, but *not* in linux.
>     ------
> 
> When, if ever, will Linux ever support double clicking and be able to use
> it in pretty much any program? Seems that is a pretty basic thing and it
> is hard to believe Linux is that far behind OS X and Windows.

As usually, you snip to distort context

The *real* answer was this

-------------------------
There we go. Double clicking is *not* standard use in linux, you 
incompetent fool

So you start with a "feature" which is used in OSX and windows, but *not* 
in linux.
-------------------------

Which means that doubleclick is available, just that it isn't used by 
default. Which is *true*

You knew that, filthy lying scum, but you got your ass handed with your 
"sudo debacle" (where you also tried to distort context by selective 
quoting) and now you try to "retaliate" by trolling and outright lying in a 
non-advocacy group.

You are the lowest lifeform imaginable, Snit Michael Glasser.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#38903

tmelmosfire@gmail.com wrote:

If your using kde4 start menu / system setting / input devices / Mouse
and you should see what your looking for. Just tried it and it works

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#38913

On 9/17/16, 5:00 AM, in article nrjb97$225l$1@adenine.netfront.net,
"Darklight" <nglennglen@netscape.net> wrote:

> tmelmosfire@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> If your using kde4 start menu / system setting / input devices / Mouse
> and you should see what your looking for. Just tried it and it works
> 
> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

Of course it does. Linux "features" double clicking as a standard input
method. The person who claimed otherwise was merely trolling.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#38932

On 2016-09-17, tmelmosfire@gmail.com <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> wrote:
> I recently read:
>
>   Peter K??hlmann:
>     ------
>     So you start with a "feature" [double clicking] which is used in
>     OSX and windows, but *not* in linux.
>     ------
>
> When, if ever, will Linux ever support double clicking and be able to use
> it in pretty much any program? Seems that is a pretty basic thing and it is hard to believe Linux is that far behind OS X and Windows.

I think they plan to introduce it about 25 years ago.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#38934

On 9/17/16, 4:12 PM, in article nrkile$4t8$1@dont-email.me, "William Unruh"
<unruh@invalid.ca> wrote:

> On 2016-09-17, tmelmosfire@gmail.com <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I recently read:
>> 
>>   Peter K??hlmann:
>>     ------
>>     So you start with a "feature" [double clicking] which is used in
>>     OSX and windows, but *not* in linux.
>>     ------
>> 
>> When, if ever, will Linux ever support double clicking and be able to use
>> it in pretty much any program? Seems that is a pretty basic thing and it is
>> hard to believe Linux is that far behind OS X and Windows.
> 
> I think they plan to introduce it about 25 years ago.
> 

LOL! Yeah... pretty much. :)


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#38982

On 17/09/16 01:09, tmelmosfire@gmail.com wrote:
> I recently read:
> 
>   Peter Köhlmann:
>     ------
>     So you start with a "feature" [double clicking] which is used in
>     OSX and windows, but *not* in linux.
>     ------
> 
> When, if ever, will Linux ever support double clicking and be able to use
Linux itself will probably *never* have the ability to double click;
however, the x-window system running on top of Linux has had
double-click since it was first written years ago, and not only has it
had it it is configurable as to what it, and sigle click, etc do.
> it in pretty much any program? Seems that is a pretty basic thing and it is hard to believe Linux is that far behind OS X and Windows.
It is a pretty basic thing for the i/o device to be on a difference
machine across a network to the actual machine running the program which
x-windows has done since it was first written (pre-Windwos), but Windwos
has took years to get anywhere close.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#38996

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:33:20 +0100, Robert Newson wrote:

> On 17/09/16 01:09, tmelmosfire@gmail.com wrote:
>> I recently read:
>> 
>>   Peter Köhlmann:
>>     ------
>>     So you start with a "feature" [double clicking] which is used in
>>     OSX and windows, but *not* in linux.
>>     ------
>> 
>> When, if ever, will Linux ever support double clicking and be able to
>> use
> Linux itself will probably *never* have the ability to double click;
> however, the x-window system running on top of Linux has had
> double-click since it was first written years ago, and not only has it
> had it it is configurable as to what it, and sigle click, etc do.
>> it in pretty much any program? Seems that is a pretty basic thing and
>> it is hard to believe Linux is that far behind OS X and Windows.
> It is a pretty basic thing for the i/o device to be on a difference
> machine across a network to the actual machine running the program which
> x-windows has done since it was first written (pre-Windwos), but Windwos
> has took years to get anywhere close.

Just so you know ... you're responding to one of the infamous troll 
"Snit's" many sock puppets. 

-- 
Using Pan 0.139 & Linux Mint Mate 17.1 (Rebecca)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#38997

On 9/22/16, 7:03 PM, in article ns22i9$isp$1@dont-email.me, "ronb"
<ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:33:20 +0100, Robert Newson wrote:
> 
>> On 17/09/16 01:09, tmelmosfire@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I recently read:
>>> 
>>>   Peter Köhlmann:
>>>     ------
>>>     So you start with a "feature" [double clicking] which is used in
>>>     OSX and windows, but *not* in linux.
>>>     ------
>>> 
>>> When, if ever, will Linux ever support double clicking and be able to
>>> use
>> Linux itself will probably *never* have the ability to double click;
>> however, the x-window system running on top of Linux has had
>> double-click since it was first written years ago, and not only has it
>> had it it is configurable as to what it, and sigle click, etc do.
>>> it in pretty much any program? Seems that is a pretty basic thing and
>>> it is hard to believe Linux is that far behind OS X and Windows.
>> It is a pretty basic thing for the i/o device to be on a difference
>> machine across a network to the actual machine running the program which
>> x-windows has done since it was first written (pre-Windwos), but Windwos
>> has took years to get anywhere close.
> 
> Just so you know ... you're responding to one of the infamous troll
> "Snit's" many sock puppets.

You are, of course, lying. Please, ronb, I know the "everyone is Snit" gag
is a mainstay of COLA, but do not bring it elsewhere. Others do not know the
context and how it is not even meat to be believed. Here you are merely
trolling.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39009

On 09/22/2016 07:03 PM, ronb wrote:

> Just so you know ... you're responding to one of the infamous troll
>
And you, you fucking moron, are prolonging the post while quoting the 
garbage.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39011

On 9/22/16, 8:48 PM, in article ns28m6$1eht$1@gioia.aioe.org, "jrg"
<connyank@cox.net> wrote:

> On 09/22/2016 07:03 PM, ronb wrote:
> 
>> Just so you know ... you're responding to one of the infamous troll
>> 
> And you, you fucking moron, are prolonging the post while quoting the
> garbage.

Sadly Marek asked me in COLA to come look for stuff here... but by making it
a public request he also invited those who troll COLA. Nasty waters there.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39062

On 23/09/16 03:03, ronb wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:33:20 +0100, Robert Newson wrote:
> 
>> On 17/09/16 01:09, tmelmosfire@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I recently read:
>>>
>>>   Peter Köhlmann:
>>>     ------
>>>     So you start with a "feature" [double clicking] which is used in
>>>     OSX and windows, but *not* in linux.
>>>     ------
>>>
>>> When, if ever, will Linux ever support double clicking and be able to
>>> use
>> Linux itself will probably *never* have the ability to double click;
>> however, the x-window system running on top of Linux has had
>> double-click since it was first written years ago, and not only has it
>> had it it is configurable as to what it, and sigle click, etc do.
>>> it in pretty much any program? Seems that is a pretty basic thing and
>>> it is hard to believe Linux is that far behind OS X and Windows.
>> It is a pretty basic thing for the i/o device to be on a difference
>> machine across a network to the actual machine running the program which
>> x-windows has done since it was first written (pre-Windwos), but Windwos
>> has took years to get anywhere close.
> 
> Just so you know ... you're responding to one of the infamous troll
I know it is a troll, I'm just bored and want to see how it responds to
its own logic thrown back at it, because it's really responding to
itself and telling me what it thinks about itself.

> "Snit's" many sock puppets. 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39066

On 9/23/16, 11:31 AM, in article ayeFz.441746$7k5.238969@fx38.am4, "Robert
Newson" <nothanks@bullet3.fsnet.oc.ku> wrote:

> On 23/09/16 03:03, ronb wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:33:20 +0100, Robert Newson wrote:
>> 
>>> On 17/09/16 01:09, tmelmosfire@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> I recently read:
>>>> 
>>>>   Peter Köhlmann:
>>>>     ------
>>>>     So you start with a "feature" [double clicking] which is used in
>>>>     OSX and windows, but *not* in linux.
>>>>     ------
>>>> 
>>>> When, if ever, will Linux ever support double clicking and be able to
>>>> use
>>> Linux itself will probably *never* have the ability to double click;
>>> however, the x-window system running on top of Linux has had
>>> double-click since it was first written years ago, and not only has it
>>> had it it is configurable as to what it, and sigle click, etc do.
>>>> it in pretty much any program? Seems that is a pretty basic thing and
>>>> it is hard to believe Linux is that far behind OS X and Windows.
>>> It is a pretty basic thing for the i/o device to be on a difference
>>> machine across a network to the actual machine running the program which
>>> x-windows has done since it was first written (pre-Windwos), but Windwos
>>> has took years to get anywhere close.
>> 
>> Just so you know ... you're responding to one of the infamous troll
> I know it is a troll, I'm just bored and want to see how it responds to
> its own logic thrown back at it, because it's really responding to
> itself and telling me what it thinks about itself.
> 
>> "Snit's" many sock puppets.

What is odd is how ronb has decided to come in and mention me in his
trolling of this group. Is it not enough that he troll COLA? I do not get
it... that strong of a desire for attention is outside of my worldview.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39070

On 09/23/2016 11:31 AM, Robert Newson wrote:

> I know it is a troll, I'm just bored

Then you're a moron as well - thanks for the heads up so I can update my 
killfile.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39088

On Friday, 23 September 2016 02:04:03 UTC, ronb  wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:33:20 +0100, Robert Newson wrote:
> 
> > On 17/09/16 01:09, tmelmosfire@gmail.com wrote:
> >> I recently read:
> >> 
> >>   Peter Köhlmann:
> >>     ------
> >>     So you start with a "feature" [double clicking] which is used in
> >>     OSX and windows, but *not* in linux.
> >>     ------
> >> 
> >> When, if ever, will Linux ever support double clicking and be able to
> >> use
> > Linux itself will probably *never* have the ability to double click;
> > however, the x-window system running on top of Linux has had
> > double-click since it was first written years ago, and not only has it
> > had it it is configurable as to what it, and sigle click, etc do.
> >> it in pretty much any program? Seems that is a pretty basic thing and
> >> it is hard to believe Linux is that far behind OS X and Windows.
> > It is a pretty basic thing for the i/o device to be on a difference
> > machine across a network to the actual machine running the program which
> > x-windows has done since it was first written (pre-Windwos), but Windwos
> > has took years to get anywhere close.
> 
> Just so you know ... you're responding to one of the infamous troll 
> "Snit's" many sock puppets. 
> 
> -- 
> Using Pan 0.139 & Linux Mint Mate 17.1 (Rebecca)

The way you go through such detail in how you busted him amazing. Thank you for the detailed explanation filled with specific evidence. Shows you really know what you are talking about.

Wait.

FUCK!

You are just trolling!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#39092

On 2016-09-24, tmelmosfire@gmail.com <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 23 September 2016 02:04:03 UTC, ronb  wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:33:20 +0100, Robert Newson wrote:
>> 
>> > On 17/09/16 01:09, tmelmosfire@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> I recently read:
>> >> 
>> >>   Peter Köhlmann:
>> >>     ------
>> >>     So you start with a "feature" [double clicking] which is used in
>> >>     OSX and windows, but *not* in linux.
>> >>     ------
>> >> 
>> >> When, if ever, will Linux ever support double clicking and be able to
>> >> use
>> > Linux itself will probably *never* have the ability to double click;
>> > however, the x-window system running on top of Linux has had
>> > double-click since it was first written years ago, and not only has it
>> > had it it is configurable as to what it, and sigle click, etc do.
>> >> it in pretty much any program? Seems that is a pretty basic thing and
>> >> it is hard to believe Linux is that far behind OS X and Windows.
>> > It is a pretty basic thing for the i/o device to be on a difference
>> > machine across a network to the actual machine running the program which
>> > x-windows has done since it was first written (pre-Windwos), but Windwos
>> > has took years to get anywhere close.
>> 
>> Just so you know ... you're responding to one of the infamous troll 
>> "Snit's" many sock puppets. 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Using Pan 0.139 & Linux Mint Mate 17.1 (Rebecca)
>
> The way you go through such detail in how you busted him amazing. Thank you for the detailed explanation filled with specific evidence. Shows you really know what you are talking about.
>
> Wait.
>
> FUCK!
>
> You are just trolling!

Another snit sock puppet.
Are you guys getting this yet?
I hope so.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.os.linux

csiph-web