Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.os.linux > #70437 > unrolled thread

Any Unicode Experts?

Back to article view | Back to alt.os.linux

Contents

  Any Unicode Experts? FR <fr@random.info> - 2021-08-06 14:39 +0000
    Re: Any Unicode Experts? FR <fr@random.info> - 2021-08-06 15:01 +0000
      Re: Any Unicode Experts? Snit Michael Glasser <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-06 08:10 -0700
    US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-08-06 08:15 -0700
      Re: US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-08-06 17:36 +0200
        Re: US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. FR <fr@random.info> - 2021-08-06 15:49 +0000
          Re: US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2021-08-06 18:48 +0200
          Re: US-ASCII is a subset of the set of Unicode code points. FR <fr@random.info> - 2021-08-06 17:57 +0000
    Re: Any Unicode Experts? Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2021-08-06 20:27 +0000
      Re: Any Unicode Experts? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-07 09:36 +0100
        Re: Any Unicode Experts? Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2021-08-08 04:32 +0000
          Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-07 22:50 -0600
            Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-08 20:32 +0200
              Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-08 18:00 -0600
                "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-08-08 18:11 -0700
                  Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-08 22:19 -0600
                    Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. Ann Glaser <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-09 14:57 -0700
                    Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. Soviet_Mario <SovietMario@CCCP.MIR> - 2021-08-16 16:06 +0200
                      Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. HHI <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-17 11:42 -0700
                      Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. STALKING_TARGET_27 <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-19 16:20 -0700
                  Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio. jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-10 18:02 +0200
                    while(malloc(666)); Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2021-08-10 09:28 -0700
                      Re: while(malloc(666)); jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-10 18:39 +0200
                Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-09 07:28 +0200
                  Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-09 07:56 -0600
                    Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-10 10:33 +0200
                      Re: Any Unicode Experts? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-10 12:49 +0100
                        Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-10 15:26 +0200
                          Re: Any Unicode Experts? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2021-08-10 13:43 +0000
                      Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-10 21:12 -0600
                        Re: Any Unicode Experts? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-11 12:25 +0100
                          Re: Any Unicode Experts? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-12 09:54 -0700
                            Re: Any Unicode Experts? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 10:58 -0700
                        Re: Any Unicode Experts? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-08-11 16:52 +0000
                          Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-11 20:19 +0200
                            Re: Any Unicode Experts? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-08-12 16:37 +0000
                              Re: Any Unicode Experts? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2021-08-12 20:32 +0200
                                Re: Any Unicode Experts? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2021-08-12 20:40 -0600
                                  Re: Any Unicode Experts? Steven Petruzzellis - fretwizen <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-14 11:14 -0700
                                    Re: Any Unicode Experts? Steven Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-15 05:19 -0700
                              Re: Any Unicode Experts? STALKING_TARGET_79 <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-13 15:09 -0700
                    Re: Any Unicode Experts? Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-08-10 16:11 -0400
        Re: Any Unicode Experts? STALKING_TARGET_53 <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2021-08-08 14:40 -0700

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#70541 — Re: "while(1);" borks Visual Studio.

Il 09/08/2021 03:11, Jeff-Relf.Me@. ha scritto:
> Bowman:
>> I'm not a power user of the VS editor but
>> 35 years later it seems to lack the features of Brief.
> 
> My macros & extensions to Visual Studio 2019:  http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Macros.HTM
> 
> In Visual Studio, I'm editing a small, recently opened text file.
> AutoRecover is turned off.
> 
> For that, it's consuming 1.8 gigabytes of RAM, and growing rapidly;
> occasionally, it drops back down to "just" 1.2 gigabytes.
> 
> Just now, it disappeared from the task manager altogether,
> showing up again only after ReStarting the task manager.
> 
> Every time I debug my app, memory usage goes up,
> briefly topping 2 gigabytes, _after_ exiting the app/debugger.
> Hmmm... it's a memory leak, apparently.
> 
> I ReStarted Visual Studio, now it's consuming 186 megabytes,
> no more memory leaking.
> 
> "while(1);" borks Visual Studio, apparently.
> 
sad C coders:

     while(1);

better:

#define ever (;;)

     for ever;

XDD

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70542 — while(malloc(666));

You (jak) replied ( to me ):
> > "while(1);" borks Visual Studio.
> 
> #define ever (;;)
> for ever;

while(malloc(666));

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70543 — Re: while(malloc(666));

Il 10/08/2021 18:28, Jeff-Relf.Me@. ha scritto:
> You (jak) replied ( to me ):
>>> "while(1);" borks Visual Studio.
>>
>> #define ever (;;)
>> for ever;
> 
> while(malloc(666));
> 

With your version, VS will probably just survive a few seconds. ;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70516

Il 09/08/2021 02:00, rbowman ha scritto:
> On 08/08/2021 12:32 PM, jak wrote:
>> Il 08/08/2021 06:50, rbowman ha scritto:
>>> On 08/07/2021 10:32 PM, Eli the Bearded wrote:
>>>> Ctrl-C for Copy I think exists because Command-C for copy first 
>>>> existed.
>>>> Neither has anything to do with the ASCII control character ETX.
>>>
>>> I'm probably wrong but I think WordStar had an influence.
>>
>> I don't think so. These are the old commands for wordstar:
>> https://sfwriter.com/wordstar-command-summary.pdf
>> In my memory the first Ctrl-X/Ctrl-C/Ctrl-V shortcuts I saw with the
>> first full-screen commands in ms-dos 3.1: explorer.exe and qbasic.exe.
>> Explorer was very similar to the Windows version but in semi-graphics
>> (video in text mode and windows drawn with ascii-extended fonts). These
>> programs finally allowed to use the mouse making the old shortcuts
>> difficult to use (Shift-Del/Ctrl-Ins/Shift-Ins) with the left hand
>> (to keep the right hand on the mouse), however the old shortcuts also
>> work today and often even with programs that suppress the new shortcuts.
>>
>> cheers
> 
> Brief had those key bindings but by '85 it wasn't clear who was copying 
> who. That was the only programming editor I ever paid money for. Borland 
> bought it and buried it.
> 
> I'm not a power user of the VS editor but 35 years later it seems to 
> lack the features of Brief.

In this way you make me dig up the past ... At that time I started
developing in dos and windows but I came from the unix and xenix world,
so the only editor I knew was the Vi, so I got a copy that ran under dos
. A powerful copy weighing 17KB. I stopped using it only many years
later when Multiedit (an amazing editor) came on the market.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70522

On 08/08/2021 11:28 PM, jak wrote:
> Il 09/08/2021 02:00, rbowman ha scritto:
>> On 08/08/2021 12:32 PM, jak wrote:
>>> Il 08/08/2021 06:50, rbowman ha scritto:
>>>> On 08/07/2021 10:32 PM, Eli the Bearded wrote:
>>>>> Ctrl-C for Copy I think exists because Command-C for copy first
>>>>> existed.
>>>>> Neither has anything to do with the ASCII control character ETX.
>>>>
>>>> I'm probably wrong but I think WordStar had an influence.
>>>
>>> I don't think so. These are the old commands for wordstar:
>>> https://sfwriter.com/wordstar-command-summary.pdf
>>> In my memory the first Ctrl-X/Ctrl-C/Ctrl-V shortcuts I saw with the
>>> first full-screen commands in ms-dos 3.1: explorer.exe and qbasic.exe.
>>> Explorer was very similar to the Windows version but in semi-graphics
>>> (video in text mode and windows drawn with ascii-extended fonts). These
>>> programs finally allowed to use the mouse making the old shortcuts
>>> difficult to use (Shift-Del/Ctrl-Ins/Shift-Ins) with the left hand
>>> (to keep the right hand on the mouse), however the old shortcuts also
>>> work today and often even with programs that suppress the new shortcuts.
>>>
>>> cheers
>>
>> Brief had those key bindings but by '85 it wasn't clear who was
>> copying who. That was the only programming editor I ever paid money
>> for. Borland bought it and buried it.
>>
>> I'm not a power user of the VS editor but 35 years later it seems to
>> lack the features of Brief.
>
> In this way you make me dig up the past ... At that time I started
> developing in dos and windows but I came from the unix and xenix world,
> so the only editor I knew was the Vi, so I got a copy that ran under dos
> . A powerful copy weighing 17KB. I stopped using it only many years
> later when Multiedit (an amazing editor) came on the market.

Back when a 1 GB hard drive was huge, the choice between Vim and Emacs 
was a no-brainer. iirc Vim was 1.6 MB, Emacs was 25 MB. It looks like 
gVim has porked up to 2.7.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70533

Il 09/08/2021 15:56, rbowman ha scritto:
> Back when a 1 GB hard drive was huge, the choice between Vim and Emacs 
> was a no-brainer. iirc Vim was 1.6 MB, Emacs was 25 MB. It looks like 
> gVim has porked up to 2.7.

No. Further back. When a hard drive was huge if greater than 30MB.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70534

On 10/08/2021 09:33, jak wrote:
> Il 09/08/2021 15:56, rbowman ha scritto:
>> Back when a 1 GB hard drive was huge, the choice between Vim and Emacs 
>> was a no-brainer. iirc Vim was 1.6 MB, Emacs was 25 MB. It looks like 
>> gVim has porked up to 2.7.
> 
> No. Further back. When a hard drive was huge if greater than 30MB.

haha.
when the PC running a serial program to the PDP 11 had more RAM than the 
PDP!

And some twat ran IIRC SED all over the source files and turned multiple 
spaces into tabs to reduce the space...and ruined all my C string 
cọnstants!!!

Happy dayz.

It was quicker to grab the files over the serial link, edit them with 
wordstar on the PC, and upload them and then compile them.

just used 'vi' for quick hacks...

-- 
It is the folly of too many to mistake the echo of a London coffee-house 
for the voice of the kingdom.

Jonathan Swift

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70537

Il 10/08/2021 13:49, The Natural Philosopher ha scritto:
> On 10/08/2021 09:33, jak wrote:
>> Il 09/08/2021 15:56, rbowman ha scritto:
>>> Back when a 1 GB hard drive was huge, the choice between Vim and 
>>> Emacs was a no-brainer. iirc Vim was 1.6 MB, Emacs was 25 MB. It 
>>> looks like gVim has porked up to 2.7.
>>
>> No. Further back. When a hard drive was huge if greater than 30MB.
> 
> haha.
> when the PC running a serial program to the PDP 11 had more RAM than the 
> PDP!
> 
> And some twat ran IIRC SED all over the source files and turned multiple 
> spaces into tabs to reduce the space...and ruined all my C string 
> cọnstants!!!
> 
> Happy dayz.
> 
> It was quicker to grab the files over the serial link, edit them with 
> wordstar on the PC, and upload them and then compile them.
> 
> just used 'vi' for quick hacks...
> 

It should be remembered more often than to modify the source codes, the
'Vi' can be a great ally when it is renamed 'Ed'.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70538

On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 15:26:27 +0200, jak wrote:

> Il 10/08/2021 13:49, The Natural Philosopher ha scritto:
>> On 10/08/2021 09:33, jak wrote:
>>> Il 09/08/2021 15:56, rbowman ha scritto:
>>>> Back when a 1 GB hard drive was huge, the choice between Vim and
>>>> Emacs was a no-brainer. iirc Vim was 1.6 MB, Emacs was 25 MB. It
>>>> looks like gVim has porked up to 2.7.
>>>
>>> No. Further back. When a hard drive was huge if greater than 30MB.
>> 
>> haha.
>> when the PC running a serial program to the PDP 11 had more RAM than
>> the PDP!
>> 
>> And some twat ran IIRC SED all over the source files and turned
>> multiple spaces into tabs to reduce the space...and ruined all my C
>> string cọnstants!!!
>> 
>> Happy dayz.
>> 
>> It was quicker to grab the files over the serial link, edit them with
>> wordstar on the PC, and upload them and then compile them.
>> 
>> just used 'vi' for quick hacks...
>> 
>> 
> It should be remembered more often than to modify the source codes, the
> 'Vi' can be a great ally when it is renamed 'Ed'.

Thank gosh!

Sensible people on the usenets!

-- 
-v

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70547

On 08/10/2021 02:33 AM, jak wrote:
> Il 09/08/2021 15:56, rbowman ha scritto:
>> Back when a 1 GB hard drive was huge, the choice between Vim and Emacs
>> was a no-brainer. iirc Vim was 1.6 MB, Emacs was 25 MB. It looks like
>> gVim has porked up to 2.7.
>
> No. Further back. When a hard drive was huge if greater than 30MB.

What am I ever going to do with all this disk space?  There is a 
corollary of Moorse's Law that pertains to executable and data bloat.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70549

On 11/08/2021 04:12, rbowman wrote:
> On 08/10/2021 02:33 AM, jak wrote:
>> Il 09/08/2021 15:56, rbowman ha scritto:
>>> Back when a 1 GB hard drive was huge, the choice between Vim and Emacs
>>> was a no-brainer. iirc Vim was 1.6 MB, Emacs was 25 MB. It looks like
>>> gVim has porked up to 2.7.
>>
>> No. Further back. When a hard drive was huge if greater than 30MB.
> 
> What am I ever going to do with all this disk space?  There is a 
> corollary of Moorse's Law that pertains to executable and data bloat.
> 
That has actually returned to haunt me. My NAS that has all the data is 
a linux box with lots of spinning rust, but my user devices are laptops 
Pis stupidPhones and a desktop pc all equipped with SSD's that are 
almost entirely read only devices. And virtually empty.

But I cant get a 30GB drive.



-- 
There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale 
returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.

Mark Twain

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70559

On Wednesday, August 11, 2021 at 4:25:29 AM UTC-7, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 11/08/2021 04:12, rbowman wrote: 
> > On 08/10/2021 02:33 AM, jak wrote: 
> >> Il 09/08/2021 15:56, rbowman ha scritto: 
> >>> Back when a 1 GB hard drive was huge, the choice between Vim and Emacs 
> >>> was a no-brainer. iirc Vim was 1.6 MB, Emacs was 25 MB. It looks like 
> >>> gVim has porked up to 2.7. 
> >> 
> >> No. Further back. When a hard drive was huge if greater than 30MB. 
> > 
> > What am I ever going to do with all this disk space? There is a 
> > corollary of Moorse's Law that pertains to executable and data bloat. 
> >
> That has actually returned to haunt me. My NAS that has all the data is 
> a linux box with lots of spinning rust, but my user devices are laptops 
> Pis stupidPhones and a desktop pc all equipped with SSD's that are 
> almost entirely read only devices. And virtually empty. 
> 
> But I cant get a 30GB drive. 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale 
> returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact. 
> 
> Mark Twain


Steven 'The Flooder' Carroll is being controlled by RMS. 

Steven 'The Flooder' Carroll expects people to believe that a poster such 
as Snit who he has many times claimed to be a liar is someone to 'believe'? 
How can he believe people are THAT stupid? Steven 'The Flooder' Carroll 
and the other trolls imply searching for guidance for a FOSS application 
is wrong. 

That's our Steven 'The Flooder' Carroll, though, no need for morals or 
so they say. Believes if your desktop/port list is online, they've got the 
right to use your CPU cycles, whether you like it or not. 

Steven 'The Flooder' Carroll wants to hurt the whole group: If he and his 
shills can't play here then nobody will. 

At times, an inner world is more valuable than facts. 

--
Best CMS Solution of 2017!
https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22
Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70603

On Thursday, August 12, 2021 at 9:54:59 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 11, 2021 at 4:25:29 AM UTC-7, The Natural Philosopher wrote: 
> > On 11/08/2021 04:12, rbowman wrote: 
> > > On 08/10/2021 02:33 AM, jak wrote: 
> > >> Il 09/08/2021 15:56, rbowman ha scritto: 
> > >>> Back when a 1 GB hard drive was huge, the choice between Vim and Emacs 
> > >>> was a no-brainer. iirc Vim was 1.6 MB, Emacs was 25 MB. It looks like 
> > >>> gVim has porked up to 2.7. 
> > >> 
> > >> No. Further back. When a hard drive was huge if greater than 30MB. 
> > > 
> > > What am I ever going to do with all this disk space? There is a 
> > > corollary of Moorse's Law that pertains to executable and data bloat. 
> > > 
> > That has actually returned to haunt me. My NAS that has all the data is 
> > a linux box with lots of spinning rust, but my user devices are laptops 
> > Pis stupidPhones and a desktop pc all equipped with SSD's that are 
> > almost entirely read only devices. And virtually empty. 
> > 
> > But I cant get a 30GB drive. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale 
> > returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact. 
> > 
> > Mark Twain
> Steven 'The Flooder' Carroll is being controlled by RMS. 
> 
> Steven 'The Flooder' Carroll expects people to believe that a poster such 
> as Snit who he has many times claimed to be a liar is someone to 'believe'? 
> How can he believe people are THAT stupid? Steven 'The Flooder' Carroll 
> and the other trolls imply searching for guidance for a FOSS application 
> is wrong. 
> 
> That's our Steven 'The Flooder' Carroll, though, no need for morals or 
> so they say. Believes if your desktop/port list is online, they've got the 
> right to use your CPU cycles, whether you like it or not. 
> 
> Steven 'The Flooder' Carroll wants to hurt the whole group: If he and his 
> shills can't play here then nobody will. 
> 
> At times, an inner world is more valuable than facts. 
> 
> -- 
> Best CMS Solution of 2017! 
> https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22 
> Dustin Cook: Functionally Illiterate Fraud



Search - <https://www.bing.com/search?q=dustin+cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud>

And <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud>

You can do even just this <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22functionally+illiterate+fraud%22>
In Rod Speed's case, I, and dozens of "crackers", had pointed to things 
Rod Speed said and did, he denied them. What Rod Speed didn't deny was people 
actually posting what I noted, which is how he ended up with his list, as 
you know. Many posters keep replying to Rod Speed. In truth I don't chide 
Gremlin for for his rants but, frankly, I do not explain why he posts here 
now that he gets what this place is. Gremlin is focused on discussions as 
done in a non-trolling group and trolling forums just will never work for 
him. Another successful AZ Code test. That is if you count wasting time as 
a success. 

--
This broke the Internet
https://www.google.com/search?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud
Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Carroll

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70555

On 2021-08-11, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

> On 08/10/2021 02:33 AM, jak wrote:
>
>> Il 09/08/2021 15:56, rbowman ha scritto:
>>
>>> Back when a 1 GB hard drive was huge, the choice between Vim and Emacs
>>> was a no-brainer. iirc Vim was 1.6 MB, Emacs was 25 MB. It looks like
>>> gVim has porked up to 2.7.
>>
>> No. Further back. When a hard drive was huge if greater than 30MB.
>
> What am I ever going to do with all this disk space?  There is a 
> corollary of Moorse's Law that pertains to executable and data bloat.

s/Moorse's/Parkinson's/

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  They don't understand Microsoft
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  has stolen their car and parked
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  a taxi in their driveway.
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |    -- Mayayana

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70557

Il 11/08/2021 18:52, Charlie Gibbs ha scritto:
> s/Moorse's/Parkinson's/

Moore's

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70558

On 2021-08-11, jak <nospam@please.ty> wrote:

> Il 11/08/2021 18:52, Charlie Gibbs ha scritto:
>
>> s/Moorse's/Parkinson's/
>
> Moore's

True, but I figured I'd used up my nitpicking allowance.

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  They don't understand Microsoft
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  has stolen their car and parked
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  a taxi in their driveway.
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |    -- Mayayana

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70562

Il 12/08/2021 18:37, Charlie Gibbs ha scritto:
> On 2021-08-11, jak <nospam@please.ty> wrote:
> 
>> Il 11/08/2021 18:52, Charlie Gibbs ha scritto:
>>
>>> s/Moorse's/Parkinson's/
>>
>> Moore's
> 
> True, but I figured I'd used up my nitpicking allowance.
> 

Do not worry. The culprit is rbowman and his bad habit at the fishing.
XDD

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70566

On 08/12/2021 12:32 PM, jak wrote:
> Il 12/08/2021 18:37, Charlie Gibbs ha scritto:
>> On 2021-08-11, jak <nospam@please.ty> wrote:
>>
>>> Il 11/08/2021 18:52, Charlie Gibbs ha scritto:
>>>
>>>> s/Moorse's/Parkinson's/
>>>
>>> Moore's
>>
>> True, but I figured I'd used up my nitpicking allowance.
>>
>
> Do not worry. The culprit is rbowman and his bad habit at the fishing.
> XDD

Man, you don't want to know about the rest of my bad habits...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70604

On Thursday, August 12, 2021 at 7:40:44 PM UTC-7, rbowman wrote:
> On 08/12/2021 12:32 PM, jak wrote: 
> > Il 12/08/2021 18:37, Charlie Gibbs ha scritto: 
> >> On 2021-08-11, jak <nos...@please.ty> wrote: 
> >> 
> >>> Il 11/08/2021 18:52, Charlie Gibbs ha scritto: 
> >>> 
> >>>> s/Moorse's/Parkinson's/ 
> >>> 
> >>> Moore's 
> >> 
> >> True, but I figured I'd used up my nitpicking allowance. 
> >> 
> > 
> > Do not worry. The culprit is rbowman and his bad habit at the fishing. 
> > XDD
> Man, you don't want to know about the rest of my bad habits...



  Gremlin Dustin Cook:
	<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
	<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
	<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

  Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
	<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
	<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
	<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

  Steve Carroll Petruzzellis:
	<https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll+petruzzellis>
	<https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve+carroll+petruzzellis>
	<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=steve+carroll+petruzzellis>

  Narcissistic Bigot:
	<https://www.google.com/search?q=narcissistic+bigot>
	<https://www.bing.com/search?q=narcissistic+bigot>
	<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=narcissistic+bigot>

I have not established that the number: (423) 491-1448 will be answered 
by Apd. Both of those guys get their jollies out of provoking reactions 
to their insults, which is the very definition of a troll. A constant, 
relentless, posting itch, while suffering from an empty mind - essentially 
slippery Apd camp followers, and well-lubricated sheep, deactivated with 
wit for his own private yearnings. But when the data were collected, it 
turns out by _that_ criteria, Apd was far more "dishonest" than anybody 
else. Studying NNTP protocol... forever a n00b... 

Can you stop begging for my attention? 

--
Get Rich Slow!
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22NARCISSISTIC+BIGOT%22
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22NARCISSISTIC+BIGOT%22
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#70623

On Saturday, August 14, 2021 at 11:14:22 AM UTC-7, Steven Carroll wrote:
> On Thursday, August 12, 2021 at 7:40:44 PM UTC-7, rbowman wrote: 
> > On 08/12/2021 12:32 PM, jak wrote: 
> > > Il 12/08/2021 18:37, Charlie Gibbs ha scritto: 
> > >> On 2021-08-11, jak <nos...@please.ty> wrote: 
> > >> 
> > >>> Il 11/08/2021 18:52, Charlie Gibbs ha scritto: 
> > >>> 
> > >>>> s/Moorse's/Parkinson's/ 
> > >>> 
> > >>> Moore's 
> > >> 
> > >> True, but I figured I'd used up my nitpicking allowance. 
> > >> 
> > > 
> > > Do not worry. The culprit is rbowman and his bad habit at the fishing. 
> > > XDD 
> > Man, you don't want to know about the rest of my bad habits...
> Gremlin Dustin Cook: 
> <https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook> 
> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook> 
> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook> 
> 
> Functionally Illiterate Fraud: 
> <https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud> 
> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud> 
> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud> 
> 
> Steve Carroll Petruzzellis: 
> <https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+carroll+petruzzellis> 
> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=steve+carroll+petruzzellis> 
> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=steve+carroll+petruzzellis> 
> 
> Narcissistic Bigot: 
> <https://www.google.com/search?q=narcissistic+bigot> 
> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=narcissistic+bigot> 
> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=narcissistic+bigot> 
> 
> I have not established that the number: (423) 491-1448 will be answered 
> by Apd. Both of those guys get their jollies out of provoking reactions 
> to their insults, which is the very definition of a troll. A constant, 
> relentless, posting itch, while suffering from an empty mind - essentially 
> slippery Apd camp followers, and well-lubricated sheep, deactivated with 
> wit for his own private yearnings. But when the data were collected, it 
> turns out by _that_ criteria, Apd was far more "dishonest" than anybody 
> else. Studying NNTP protocol... forever a n00b... 
> 
> Can you stop begging for my attention? 
> 
> -- 
> Get Rich Slow! 
> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22NARCISSISTIC+BIGOT%22 
> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22NARCISSISTIC+BIGOT%22 
> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook+the+functional+illiterate+fraud 
> Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot


It was Chris who was publicly asking how better to camouflage his forgeries. 
Chris has yet to show how AZ cryptology does anything above the basics on 
Linux. Chris's done a pretty good job with (I'd guess) the Baum–Welch method 
to regurgitate texts which are made to sound like a response from my posts. 

When I first posted, I wanted to be fair and nonjudgemental. I gave Chris 
more than an intelligent person could be expected to. These posts are clearly 
NOT automated, they are made by an overmedicated loser with an axe to grind 
who has way too much time on his hands (with maybe some scripted pre-processing). 

--
Do not click this link!!
https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dustin%20Cook%20functional%20illiterate%20fraud
108 Warrior Dr. Kingsport, TN 37663
Dustin Cook the functionally illiterate fraud

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.os.linux

csiph-web