Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux.slackware > #26604
| From | Joost Kremers <joost.m.kremers@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux.slackware |
| Subject | Re: TeX and Scribus |
| Date | 2016-04-05 07:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dmh7ihF6m61U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <6e43b61d-fa80-4314-8631-ba6e7ac845e9@googlegroups.com> <p6-dnd79pL3TzZ7KnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Martha Adams wrote: > I certainly think Scribus looks interesting and useful, however, I > *cannot* agree that the TeX in today's Slackware is "so obsolete as > to be practically useless." If you're using TeX & friends just to produce your own documents and your needs are modest, then you may have a point. If you live in 2016, however, chances are your documents have requirements (say, Unicode) that did not exist in 2006 (when the last update to teTeX was made) or that have vastly improved since then. (I'm not sure if teTeX included the Libertine/Biolinum fonts, but I have seen more than one bug in them squashed since I started using them.) And if you're working with (La)TeX documents created by others, then teTeX just won't do. Plain old TeX documents might still compile, but modern LaTeX documents with any complexity beyond the basic stuff most likely won't. > I was using TeX daily some 30+ years ago > and I would expect that if I made a comparison, today's Slackware > TeX would be like the TeX back then. Plain TeX, probably, but LaTeX? LaTeX 10 years ago was quite different from LaTeX 30 years ago. And LaTeX today is different from LaTeX 10 years ago. -- Joost Kremers joostkremers@fastmail.fm Selbst in die Unterwelt dringt durch Spalten Licht EN:SiS(9)
Back to alt.os.linux.slackware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
TeX and Scribus "john@wexfordpress.com" <john@wexfordpress.com> - 2016-04-04 08:12 -0700
Re: TeX and Scribus Martha Adams <mhada@verizon.net> - 2016-04-05 01:42 -0400
Re: TeX and Scribus Joost Kremers <joost.m.kremers@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 07:25 +0000
Re: TeX and Scribus W. Greenhouse <wgreenhouse@riseup.net> - 2016-04-05 14:15 +0000
Re: TeX and Scribus Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-04-05 21:13 +0000
Re: TeX and Scribus W. Greenhouse <wgreenhouse@riseup.net> - 2016-04-05 21:20 +0000
Re: TeX and Scribus JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2016-04-06 07:14 +0000
Re: TeX and Scribus Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2016-04-06 18:26 +0000
Re: TeX and Scribus W. Greenhouse <wgreenhouse@riseup.net> - 2016-04-06 20:47 +0000
Re: TeX and Scribus JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2016-04-07 00:11 +0000
Re: TeX and Scribus Henrik Carlqvist <Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com> - 2016-04-07 05:17 +0000
Re: TeX and Scribus Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 05:13 +0000
Re: TeX and Scribus "john@wexfordpress.com" <john@wexfordpress.com> - 2016-04-05 07:00 -0700
Re: TeX and Scribus Jim Diamond <Jim.Diamond@deletethis.AcadiaU.ca> - 2016-04-05 21:35 -0300
Re: TeX and Scribus Martha Adams <mhada@verizon.net> - 2016-04-06 21:17 -0400
Re: TeX and Scribus JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2016-04-07 04:54 +0000
Re: TeX and Scribus Joost Kremers <joost.m.kremers@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 07:46 +0000
Re: TeX and Scribus W. Greenhouse <wgreenhouse@riseup.net> - 2016-04-07 14:10 +0000
csiph-web