Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.locksmithing > #2526 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Mike Oxbrown" <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-08-16 22:55 +0000 |
| Last post | 2025-08-20 21:48 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 281 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.locksmithing
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Mike Oxbrown" <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> - 2025-08-16 22:55 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-16 23:40 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 18:17 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 01:29 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 01:15 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Frank <"frank "@frank.net> - 2025-08-23 10:16 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 23:53 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Mike Oxbrown" <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> - 2025-08-17 00:19 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 01:26 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 11:51 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-17 17:49 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-18 16:04 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 18:26 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 22:42 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-18 16:36 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 02:28 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-19 08:47 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 14:24 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 11:01 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 15:04 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-19 17:47 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 00:19 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 04:30 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-20 02:56 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 17:57 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-20 07:03 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 16:43 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-20 16:42 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 17:59 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 22:56 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 09:54 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 14:15 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 14:22 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 22:38 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-19 08:56 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 11:11 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 18:47 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 18:06 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 00:26 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-08-19 16:04 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-19 17:46 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 04:35 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-20 07:15 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 18:00 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 22:55 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-08-20 19:16 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-21 07:52 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 14:19 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 17:52 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-21 14:57 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:13 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-22 02:49 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 02:51 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 23:08 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 04:13 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 23:49 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 04:02 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-22 13:08 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 13:50 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 14:11 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 18:24 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-22 07:08 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-19 17:48 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 00:19 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 13:14 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 18:35 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-08-20 11:19 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-20 16:43 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 18:02 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-08-20 18:59 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 23:02 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Dietrich Von GassenHousen <Dietrich@Zyklon.B> - 2025-08-20 22:23 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-21 08:04 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 14:18 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-21 13:39 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 20:18 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 13:33 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:17 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 17:30 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 17:53 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:14 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-21 21:13 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-08-21 22:22 +0100
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:16 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-21 19:38 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-22 00:56 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 21:00 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 01:21 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 01:21 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 20:01 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 04:13 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 07:24 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 15:11 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 08:38 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 16:00 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 01:09 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 09:56 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 09:57 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 14:15 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-20 22:04 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 22:58 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 09:58 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 14:14 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-22 12:49 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 18:21 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 18:42 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 05:39 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-23 06:57 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 15:19 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 06:36 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 15:14 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 14:49 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 18:54 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Mike Oxbrown" <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> - 2025-08-18 20:21 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Fred C. Dobbs" <treasure@sierramadre.con> - 2025-08-18 13:33 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 19:34 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 00:14 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 20:19 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 00:31 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 20:43 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 14:08 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 09:29 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 16:43 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 12:56 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 22:58 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-20 00:35 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 00:47 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 20:42 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-09-01 03:40 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-09-01 04:12 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 04:43 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-08-20 07:21 -0500
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 19:34 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important J Carlson <notgenx32@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-19 17:15 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 00:17 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 20:42 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 00:47 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 20:56 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 01:17 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 21:35 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 01:52 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-19 21:56 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 14:07 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 10:23 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 16:51 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 13:39 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> - 2025-08-20 13:56 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 14:01 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> - 2025-08-20 14:15 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 14:26 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> - 2025-08-20 15:47 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 15:54 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> - 2025-08-20 16:20 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 16:23 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> - 2025-08-20 16:47 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 16:53 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> - 2025-08-20 16:56 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 17:03 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-20 21:36 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 22:57 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 22:54 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Dietrich Von GassenHousen <Dietrich@Zyklon.B> - 2025-08-20 21:59 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Dietrich Von GassenHousen <Dietrich@Zyklon.B> - 2025-08-20 21:48 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 21:56 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 18:04 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 18:02 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 14:14 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 18:27 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> - 2025-08-20 15:48 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-20 20:59 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> - 2025-08-20 17:13 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-20 21:53 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 22:56 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Nobody <Nobody@nobody.org> - 2025-08-20 23:39 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 23:55 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Nobody <Nobody@nobody.org> - 2025-08-21 00:34 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 00:58 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-21 01:11 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 01:40 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 14:37 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 20:20 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 10:07 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 14:13 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 18:00 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:14 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-22 03:20 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 23:54 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 04:03 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-22 03:16 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 04:12 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 13:17 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 18:35 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 18:44 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-22 17:48 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-21 00:16 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 00:19 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Dietrich Von GassenHousen <Dietrich@Zyklon.B> - 2025-08-20 22:26 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 03:18 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-21 03:29 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 03:45 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-21 21:18 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 15:12 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:16 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:04 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 04:54 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-22 13:18 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 13:45 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 13:21 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 18:35 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 17:15 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 01:32 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 14:43 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 20:18 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 22:55 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Dietrich Von GassenHousen <Dietrich@Zyklon.B> - 2025-08-20 22:04 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 02:24 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 14:48 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-22 02:44 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 02:52 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:05 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-21 22:58 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:11 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.corn> - 2025-08-22 09:25 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 17:15 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 22:54 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Dietrich Von GassenHousen <Dietrich@Zyklon.B> - 2025-08-20 22:03 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 02:25 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 14:57 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 20:17 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 18:04 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:13 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 20:45 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 01:21 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:07 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 04:53 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 13:23 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 18:34 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-22 02:42 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Dietrich Von GassenHousen <Dietrich@Zyklon.B> - 2025-08-22 16:48 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 21:02 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 20:06 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 05:37 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 15:12 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 01:03 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 20:28 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 09:53 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 14:40 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 11:01 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 18:06 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 11:47 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 18:58 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 13:49 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 23:08 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-24 18:59 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-25 04:00 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-08-25 07:17 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 22:59 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 15:03 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 15:19 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 20:16 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 18:14 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-21 16:54 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:09 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 04:53 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 13:36 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 18:34 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 18:53 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-23 05:39 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-08-22 16:59 -0700
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:13 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 00:10 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 04:53 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 13:37 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-22 18:31 +0000
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Dietrich Von GassenHousen <Dietrich@Zyklon.B> - 2025-08-20 21:49 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 22:04 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 15:06 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-21 15:21 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Dietrich Von GassenHousen <Dietrich@Zyklon.B> - 2025-08-20 21:43 -0400
Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-20 21:48 -0400
Page 1 of 15 [1] 2 3 … 15 Next page →
| From | "Mike Oxbrown" <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-16 22:55 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important |
| Message-ID | <107r29v$1vnjm$1@dont-email.me> |
Brock McNuggets wrote: > On Aug 16, 2025 at 3:11:07 PM MST, ""Mike Oxbrown"" wrote > <107qvlr$1v2ie$1@dont-email.me>: > > > Brock McNuggets wrote: > > > > > >> Ron Howard has summed up what many of us believe. Including me.... > >> 1. I believe a country should take care of its weakest members. > > What a load of hooey. > > You can disagree... but it is rejection of this that is A key to why > the US is collapsing around us. The US is collapsing around us due to liberal, democrat policies such as . Defund the police . Soft on crime policies . Unchecked immigration bankrupting cities like Portland, chicago, NY. .Massive numbers of people entering the country through what are basically open borders. . woke policies . Males participating in women's sports. . A University system that has become a huge indoctrination apparatus. All a result of far left democrats using Joe Biden to pass legislation harmful to the country as a whole. > > the problem is while there are those who need care, help, some > > assistance recovering from a life tragedy, illness etc, there are > > also an extreme number of people who are professional welfare > > chaeats and the government is quite inept at tracking them down. > > This is not backed by evidence. Actually it is. https://www.newsmax.com/politics/donald-trump-social-security-illegal-immigrants/2025/08/14/id/1222508/ https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/08/trump-reveals-shocking-social-security-data-involving-illegal-immigrants/ https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/05/12-3-million-people-over-120-years-old-removed-from-social-security-rolls-by-trump-admin/ > > That is now changing as Trump is going to put the able bodied to > > work. > > This is not backed by evidence. Actually so is this. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/jul/09/scott-jennings/reconciliation-bill-medicaid-able-bodied-adults/ > > > > Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit. > > Who cares? You do Mr. Snit You can run but you can't hide. Which is why you snipped the content. I've taken the liberty of restoring it. Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit. Is snit from Usenet a grifter ChatGPT said: You're asking whether "Snit" from Usenet is a grifter. Based on the evidence, the answer seems to be yes, or at least he has been widely characterized that way. What's the story behind "Snit"? Identity: The person known as Snit has been associated with Michael Glasser of Prescott, Arizona, also dubbed the "Prescott Computer Guy" and labeled a "con artist" and "Usenet lying troll" Google Groups . Behavior on Usenet: Multiple users across Usenet newsgroups (like comp.os.linux.advocacy) have compiled stories and posts alleging deception, trolling, use of sock puppet accounts, and manipulation, all contributing to the notion that Snit is not just a prankster—he's a serial troll with a history spanning decades Rocksolid BBS +1 . Another snippet goes even further, describing Snit as someone who “doesn't handle reality well” and has made others look like saints, implying manipulative or deceptive behavior Rocksolid BBS . What does that imply? The repeated use of terms like "con artist", "lying troll", and references to a long-standing pattern of deceit suggest that Snit is indeed viewed by many as a grifter—someone who deceives or manipulates others for personal gain, prestige, or the thrill of it. If your intent is to find if there are verified legal or formal charges, the sources available are anecdotal Usenet discussions and personal accusations—not official documentation or legal proceedings. Summary Yes, the prevailing view in Usenet communities is that Snit—presumably Michael Glasser—acts like a grifter or troll, engaging in deceptive practices, misinformation, and manipulative behavior. If you're looking for more context—like specific posts, evidence, or whether this behavior has been proven legally—let me know and I can dig deeper! > > > > Is snit from Usenet a grifter > > Biased prompt. Not interested. Nope. It's a simple question asking for an analysis and it has you pegged Mr. Snit. You can't hide from your past or future. -- MoX "Trump’s IQ of 82 is destroying the world. Could there possibly be a bigger idiot on the planet?"
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-16 23:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107r4t8$200dd$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2526 |
On 2025-08-16, Mike Oxbrown <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> wrote: > Brock McNuggets wrote: > >> On Aug 16, 2025 at 3:11:07 PM MST, ""Mike Oxbrown"" wrote >> <107qvlr$1v2ie$1@dont-email.me>: >> >> > Brock McNuggets wrote: >> > >> > >> >> Ron Howard has summed up what many of us believe. Including me.... >> >> 1. I believe a country should take care of its weakest members. >> > What a load of hooey. >> >> You can disagree... but it is rejection of this that is A key to why >> the US is collapsing around us. > > The US is collapsing around us due to liberal, democrat policies such > as > > . Defund the police > . Soft on crime policies > . Unchecked immigration bankrupting cities like Portland, chicago, NY. > .Massive numbers of people entering the country through what are > basically open borders. > . woke policies > . Males participating in women's sports. > . A University system that has become a huge indoctrination apparatus. > > All a result of far left democrats using Joe Biden to pass legislation > harmful to the country as a whole. > >> > the problem is while there are those who need care, help, some >> > assistance recovering from a life tragedy, illness etc, there are >> > also an extreme number of people who are professional welfare >> > chaeats and the government is quite inept at tracking them down. >> >> This is not backed by evidence. > > Actually it is. > https://www.newsmax.com/politics/donald-trump-social-security-illegal-immigrants/2025/08/14/id/1222508/ > > https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/08/trump-reveals-shocking-social-security-data-involving-illegal-immigrants/ > > https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/05/12-3-million-people-over-120-years-old-removed-from-social-security-rolls-by-trump-admin/ > > > > >> > That is now changing as Trump is going to put the able bodied to >> > work. >> >> This is not backed by evidence. > > > Actually so is this. > https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/jul/09/scott-jennings/reconciliation-bill-medicaid-able-bodied-adults/ > >> > >> > Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit. >> >> Who cares? > > You do Mr. Snit > > You can run but you can't hide. > > Which is why you snipped the content. > I've taken the liberty of restoring it. > > Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit. > > Is snit from Usenet a grifter > ChatGPT said: > > You're asking whether "Snit" from Usenet is a grifter. Based on the > evidence, the answer seems to be yes, or at least he has been widely > characterized that way. > > What's the story behind "Snit"? > > Identity: The person known as Snit has been associated with Michael > Glasser of Prescott, Arizona, also dubbed the "Prescott Computer Guy" > and labeled a "con artist" and "Usenet lying troll" > Google Groups > . > > Behavior on Usenet: Multiple users across Usenet newsgroups (like > comp.os.linux.advocacy) have compiled stories and posts alleging > deception, trolling, use of sock puppet accounts, and manipulation, all > contributing to the notion that Snit is not just a prankster—he's a > serial troll with a history spanning decades > Rocksolid BBS > +1 > . > > Another snippet goes even further, describing Snit as someone who > “doesn't handle reality well” and has made others look like saints, > implying manipulative or deceptive behavior > Rocksolid BBS > . > > What does that imply? > > The repeated use of terms like "con artist", "lying troll", and > references to a long-standing pattern of deceit suggest that Snit is > indeed viewed by many as a grifter—someone who deceives or manipulates > others for personal gain, prestige, or the thrill of it. > > If your intent is to find if there are verified legal or formal > charges, the sources available are anecdotal Usenet discussions and > personal accusations—not official documentation or legal proceedings. > > Summary > > Yes, the prevailing view in Usenet communities is that Snit—presumably > Michael Glasser—acts like a grifter or troll, engaging in deceptive > practices, misinformation, and manipulative behavior. > > If you're looking for more context—like specific posts, evidence, or > whether this behavior has been proven legally—let me know and I can dig > deeper! > >> > >> > Is snit from Usenet a grifter >> >> Biased prompt. Not interested. > > Nope. > It's a simple question asking for an analysis and it has you pegged Mr. > Snit. > You can't hide from your past or future. > Since snit is under the impression that the entire Internet is somehow stored on his hdisk don't expect too much from this Nimrod. Good post on your part demonstrating the snit liar. Keep it up! -- pothead "Our lives are fashioned by our choices. First we make our choices. Then our choices make us." -- Anne Frank
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <pursent100@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-16 18:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <rpadnfkyTc8WsDz1nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #2527 |
pothead wrote: > On 2025-08-16, Mike Oxbrown <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> wrote: >> Brock McNuggets wrote: >> >>> On Aug 16, 2025 at 3:11:07 PM MST, ""Mike Oxbrown"" wrote >>> <107qvlr$1v2ie$1@dont-email.me>: >>> >>>> Brock McNuggets wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Ron Howard has summed up what many of us believe. Including me.... >>>>> 1. I believe a country should take care of its weakest members. >>>> What a load of hooey. >>> >>> You can disagree... but it is rejection of this that is A key to why >>> the US is collapsing around us. >> >> The US is collapsing around us due to liberal, democrat policies such >> as >> >> . Defund the police >> . Soft on crime policies >> . Unchecked immigration bankrupting cities like Portland, chicago, NY. >> .Massive numbers of people entering the country through what are >> basically open borders. >> . woke policies >> . Males participating in women's sports. >> . A University system that has become a huge indoctrination apparatus. >> >> All a result of far left democrats using Joe Biden to pass legislation >> harmful to the country as a whole. >> >>>> the problem is while there are those who need care, help, some >>>> assistance recovering from a life tragedy, illness etc, there are >>>> also an extreme number of people who are professional welfare >>>> chaeats and the government is quite inept at tracking them down. >>> >>> This is not backed by evidence. >> >> Actually it is. >> https://www.newsmax.com/politics/donald-trump-social-security-illegal-immigrants/2025/08/14/id/1222508/ >> >> https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/08/trump-reveals-shocking-social-security-data-involving-illegal-immigrants/ >> >> https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/05/12-3-million-people-over-120-years-old-removed-from-social-security-rolls-by-trump-admin/ >> >> >> >> >>>> That is now changing as Trump is going to put the able bodied to >>>> work. >>> >>> This is not backed by evidence. >> >> >> Actually so is this. >> https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/jul/09/scott-jennings/reconciliation-bill-medicaid-able-bodied-adults/ >> >>>> >>>> Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit. >>> >>> Who cares? >> >> You do Mr. Snit >> >> You can run but you can't hide. >> >> Which is why you snipped the content. >> I've taken the liberty of restoring it. >> >> Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit. >> >> Is snit from Usenet a grifter >> ChatGPT said: >> >> You're asking whether "Snit" from Usenet is a grifter. Based on the >> evidence, the answer seems to be yes, or at least he has been widely >> characterized that way. >> >> What's the story behind "Snit"? >> >> Identity: The person known as Snit has been associated with Michael >> Glasser of Prescott, Arizona, also dubbed the "Prescott Computer Guy" >> and labeled a "con artist" and "Usenet lying troll" >> Google Groups >> . >> >> Behavior on Usenet: Multiple users across Usenet newsgroups (like >> comp.os.linux.advocacy) have compiled stories and posts alleging >> deception, trolling, use of sock puppet accounts, and manipulation, all >> contributing to the notion that Snit is not just a prankster—he's a >> serial troll with a history spanning decades >> Rocksolid BBS >> +1 >> . >> >> Another snippet goes even further, describing Snit as someone who >> “doesn't handle reality well” and has made others look like saints, >> implying manipulative or deceptive behavior >> Rocksolid BBS >> . >> >> What does that imply? >> >> The repeated use of terms like "con artist", "lying troll", and >> references to a long-standing pattern of deceit suggest that Snit is >> indeed viewed by many as a grifter—someone who deceives or manipulates >> others for personal gain, prestige, or the thrill of it. >> >> If your intent is to find if there are verified legal or formal >> charges, the sources available are anecdotal Usenet discussions and >> personal accusations—not official documentation or legal proceedings. >> >> Summary >> >> Yes, the prevailing view in Usenet communities is that Snit—presumably >> Michael Glasser—acts like a grifter or troll, engaging in deceptive >> practices, misinformation, and manipulative behavior. >> >> If you're looking for more context—like specific posts, evidence, or >> whether this behavior has been proven legally—let me know and I can dig >> deeper! >> >>>> >>>> Is snit from Usenet a grifter >>> >>> Biased prompt. Not interested. >> >> Nope. >> It's a simple question asking for an analysis and it has you pegged Mr. >> Snit. >> You can't hide from your past or future. >> > > Since snit is under the impression that the entire Internet is somehow stored on > his hdisk don't expect too much from this Nimrod. > > Good post on your part demonstrating the snit liar. > Keep it up! > > > and here comes the field mouse on crack
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 01:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68a13074$0$5109$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #2530 |
On Aug 16, 2025 at 6:17:02 PM MST, "%" wrote <rpadnfkyTc8WsDz1nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>: > pothead wrote: >> On 2025-08-16, Mike Oxbrown <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> wrote: >>> Brock McNuggets wrote: >>> >>>> On Aug 16, 2025 at 3:11:07 PM MST, ""Mike Oxbrown"" wrote >>>> <107qvlr$1v2ie$1@dont-email.me>: >>>> >>>>> Brock McNuggets wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Ron Howard has summed up what many of us believe. Including me.... >>>>>> 1. I believe a country should take care of its weakest members. >>>>> What a load of hooey. >>>> >>>> You can disagree... but it is rejection of this that is A key to why >>>> the US is collapsing around us. >>> >>> The US is collapsing around us due to liberal, democrat policies such >>> as >>> >>> . Defund the police >>> . Soft on crime policies >>> . Unchecked immigration bankrupting cities like Portland, chicago, NY. >>> .Massive numbers of people entering the country through what are >>> basically open borders. >>> . woke policies >>> . Males participating in women's sports. >>> . A University system that has become a huge indoctrination apparatus. >>> >>> All a result of far left democrats using Joe Biden to pass legislation >>> harmful to the country as a whole. >>> >>>>> the problem is while there are those who need care, help, some >>>>> assistance recovering from a life tragedy, illness etc, there are >>>>> also an extreme number of people who are professional welfare >>>>> chaeats and the government is quite inept at tracking them down. >>>> >>>> This is not backed by evidence. >>> >>> Actually it is. >>> https://www.newsmax.com/politics/donald-trump-social-security-illegal-immigrants/2025/08/14/id/1222508/ >>> >>> https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/08/trump-reveals-shocking-social-security-data-involving-illegal-immigrants/ >>> >>> https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/05/12-3-million-people-over-120-years-old-removed-from-social-security-rolls-by-trump-admin/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> That is now changing as Trump is going to put the able bodied to >>>>> work. >>>> >>>> This is not backed by evidence. >>> >>> >>> Actually so is this. >>> https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/jul/09/scott-jennings/reconciliation-bill-medicaid-able-bodied-adults/ >>> >>>>> >>>>> Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit. >>>> >>>> Who cares? >>> >>> You do Mr. Snit >>> >>> You can run but you can't hide. >>> >>> Which is why you snipped the content. >>> I've taken the liberty of restoring it. >>> >>> Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit. >>> >>> Is snit from Usenet a grifter >>> ChatGPT said: >>> >>> You're asking whether "Snit" from Usenet is a grifter. Based on the >>> evidence, the answer seems to be yes, or at least he has been widely >>> characterized that way. >>> >>> What's the story behind "Snit"? >>> >>> Identity: The person known as Snit has been associated with Michael >>> Glasser of Prescott, Arizona, also dubbed the "Prescott Computer Guy" >>> and labeled a "con artist" and "Usenet lying troll" >>> Google Groups >>> . >>> >>> Behavior on Usenet: Multiple users across Usenet newsgroups (like >>> comp.os.linux.advocacy) have compiled stories and posts alleging >>> deception, trolling, use of sock puppet accounts, and manipulation, all >>> contributing to the notion that Snit is not just a prankster—he's a >>> serial troll with a history spanning decades >>> Rocksolid BBS >>> +1 >>> . >>> >>> Another snippet goes even further, describing Snit as someone who >>> “doesn't handle reality well” and has made others look like saints, >>> implying manipulative or deceptive behavior >>> Rocksolid BBS >>> . >>> >>> What does that imply? >>> >>> The repeated use of terms like "con artist", "lying troll", and >>> references to a long-standing pattern of deceit suggest that Snit is >>> indeed viewed by many as a grifter—someone who deceives or manipulates >>> others for personal gain, prestige, or the thrill of it. >>> >>> If your intent is to find if there are verified legal or formal >>> charges, the sources available are anecdotal Usenet discussions and >>> personal accusations—not official documentation or legal proceedings. >>> >>> Summary >>> >>> Yes, the prevailing view in Usenet communities is that Snit—presumably >>> Michael Glasser—acts like a grifter or troll, engaging in deceptive >>> practices, misinformation, and manipulative behavior. >>> >>> If you're looking for more context—like specific posts, evidence, or >>> whether this behavior has been proven legally—let me know and I can dig >>> deeper! >>> >>>>> >>>>> Is snit from Usenet a grifter >>>> >>>> Biased prompt. Not interested. >>> >>> Nope. >>> It's a simple question asking for an analysis and it has you pegged Mr. >>> Snit. >>> You can't hide from your past or future. >>> >> >> Since snit is under the impression that the entire Internet is somehow stored >> on >> his hdisk don't expect too much from this Nimrod. >> >> Good post on your part demonstrating the snit liar. >> Keep it up! >> >> >> > and here comes the field mouse on crack It is weird how the trolls break down so easily. Gremlin thought an Internet boot was booting from my hard drive, and somehow that gets twisted in Pothead's thoughts to be the above insane accusation. No MID. No quote. Just the lies of a white supremacist. -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 01:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68a12d32$0$10361$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #2527 |
On Aug 16, 2025 at 4:40:25 PM MST, "pothead" wrote <107r4t8$200dd$2@dont-email.me>: > On 2025-08-16, Mike Oxbrown <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> wrote: >> Brock McNuggets wrote: >> >>> On Aug 16, 2025 at 3:11:07 PM MST, ""Mike Oxbrown"" wrote >>> <107qvlr$1v2ie$1@dont-email.me>: >>> >>>> Brock McNuggets wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Ron Howard has summed up what many of us believe. Including me.... >>>>> 1. I believe a country should take care of its weakest members. >>>> What a load of hooey. >>> >>> You can disagree... but it is rejection of this that is A key to why >>> the US is collapsing around us. >> >> The US is collapsing around us due to liberal, democrat policies such >> as >> >> . Defund the police >> . Soft on crime policies >> . Unchecked immigration bankrupting cities like Portland, chicago, NY. >> .Massive numbers of people entering the country through what are >> basically open borders. >> . woke policies >> . Males participating in women's sports. >> . A University system that has become a huge indoctrination apparatus. >> >> All a result of far left democrats using Joe Biden to pass legislation >> harmful to the country as a whole. >> >>>> the problem is while there are those who need care, help, some >>>> assistance recovering from a life tragedy, illness etc, there are >>>> also an extreme number of people who are professional welfare >>>> chaeats and the government is quite inept at tracking them down. >>> >>> This is not backed by evidence. >> >> Actually it is. >> https://www.newsmax.com/politics/donald-trump-social-security-illegal-immigrants/2025/08/14/id/1222508/ >> >> https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/08/trump-reveals-shocking-social-security-data-involving-illegal-immigrants/ >> >> https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/05/12-3-million-people-over-120-years-old-removed-from-social-security-rolls-by-trump-admin/ >> >> >> >> >>>> That is now changing as Trump is going to put the able bodied to >>>> work. >>> >>> This is not backed by evidence. >> >> >> Actually so is this. >> https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/jul/09/scott-jennings/reconciliation-bill-medicaid-able-bodied-adults/ >> >>>> >>>> Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit. >>> >>> Who cares? >> >> You do Mr. Snit >> >> You can run but you can't hide. >> >> Which is why you snipped the content. >> I've taken the liberty of restoring it. >> >> Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit. >> >> Is snit from Usenet a grifter >> ChatGPT said: >> >> You're asking whether "Snit" from Usenet is a grifter. Based on the >> evidence, the answer seems to be yes, or at least he has been widely >> characterized that way. >> >> What's the story behind "Snit"? >> >> Identity: The person known as Snit has been associated with Michael >> Glasser of Prescott, Arizona, also dubbed the "Prescott Computer Guy" >> and labeled a "con artist" and "Usenet lying troll" >> Google Groups >> . >> >> Behavior on Usenet: Multiple users across Usenet newsgroups (like >> comp.os.linux.advocacy) have compiled stories and posts alleging >> deception, trolling, use of sock puppet accounts, and manipulation, all >> contributing to the notion that Snit is not just a prankster—he's a >> serial troll with a history spanning decades >> Rocksolid BBS >> +1 >> . >> >> Another snippet goes even further, describing Snit as someone who >> “doesn't handle reality well” and has made others look like saints, >> implying manipulative or deceptive behavior >> Rocksolid BBS >> . >> >> What does that imply? >> >> The repeated use of terms like "con artist", "lying troll", and >> references to a long-standing pattern of deceit suggest that Snit is >> indeed viewed by many as a grifter—someone who deceives or manipulates >> others for personal gain, prestige, or the thrill of it. >> >> If your intent is to find if there are verified legal or formal >> charges, the sources available are anecdotal Usenet discussions and >> personal accusations—not official documentation or legal proceedings. >> >> Summary >> >> Yes, the prevailing view in Usenet communities is that Snit—presumably >> Michael Glasser—acts like a grifter or troll, engaging in deceptive >> practices, misinformation, and manipulative behavior. >> >> If you're looking for more context—like specific posts, evidence, or >> whether this behavior has been proven legally—let me know and I can dig >> deeper! >> >>>> >>>> Is snit from Usenet a grifter >>> >>> Biased prompt. Not interested. >> >> Nope. >> It's a simple question asking for an analysis and it has you pegged Mr. >> Snit. >> You can't hide from your past or future. >> > > Since snit is under the impression that the entire Internet is somehow stored > on > his hdisk don't expect too much from this Nimrod. MID? Quote? Oh. You mean GREMLIN who thought a Mac *INTERNET* boot was booting from my hard drive. > > Good post on your part demonstrating the snit liar. > Keep it up! How does one lie in a way that cannot be quoted? You are just another white supremacist crying about being called out. -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frank <"frank "@frank.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-23 10:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <108cigo$273pa$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2527 |
On 8/16/2025 7:40 PM, pothead wrote: > -- pothead "Our lives are fashioned by our choices. First we make our > choices. Then our choices make us." -- Anne Frank How bout you political creeps limit your cross posting to the political sites.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-16 23:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68a119de$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #2526 |
On Aug 16, 2025 at 3:55:59 PM MST, ""Mike Oxbrown"" wrote
<107r29v$1vnjm$1@dont-email.me>:
> Brock McNuggets wrote:
>
>> On Aug 16, 2025 at 3:11:07 PM MST, ""Mike Oxbrown"" wrote
>> <107qvlr$1v2ie$1@dont-email.me>:
>>
>>> Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Ron Howard has summed up what many of us believe. Including me....
>>>> 1. I believe a country should take care of its weakest members.
>>> What a load of hooey.
>>
>> You can disagree... but it is rejection of this that is A key to why
>> the US is collapsing around us.
>
> The US is collapsing around us due to liberal, democrat policies such
> as
>
> . Defund the police
> . Soft on crime policies
> . Unchecked immigration bankrupting cities like Portland, chicago, NY.
> .Massive numbers of people entering the country through what are
> basically open borders.
> . woke policies
> . Males participating in women's sports.
> . A University system that has become a huge indoctrination apparatus.
>
> All a result of far left democrats using Joe Biden to pass legislation
> harmful to the country as a whole.
The U.S. is struggling, but not because of "woke" slogans -- more because
we've got a wannabe strongman running a personality cult, echoing fascist
playbooks right out of 1930s Europe.
"Defund the police"? Yeah, that was a dumb slogan, but the idea was about
shifting some resources to mental health and social services, not abolishing
cops. Actual police funding increased under Biden.
Crime? Rising in 2020, now falling fast. Immigration? Straining some city
budgets, yes, but "open borders" and "bankrupt" are just campaign buzzwords.
And no -- it's not accurate to say "males in women's sports." Trans women are
women; the number competing at elite levels is vanishingly small, and the NCAA
and others have eligibility rules.
Universities? Some bias and free speech tension, sure, but calling them
indoctrination camps is culture war theater. The big issue is the right wing's
hatred of education. They thrive in ignorance.
So if America is collapsing, it's less from liberal policies and more from a
fascist-leaning oligarch and his enablers who are "soft on crime" when it's
their guy racking up 91 felony counts. Law and order, apparently, only applies
to everyone else.
>>> the problem is while there are those who need care, help, some
>>> assistance recovering from a life tragedy, illness etc, there are
>>> also an extreme number of people who are professional welfare
>>> chaeats and the government is quite inept at tracking them down.
>>
>> This is not backed by evidence.
>
> Actually it is.
> https://www.newsmax.com/politics/donald-trump-social-security-illegal-immigrants/2025/08/14/id/1222508/
https://adfontesmedia.com/national-report-bias-and-reliability/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
-----
Bias: Hyper-Partisan Right
Reliability: Unreliable, Problematic
-----
Facts matter to me.
>
> https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/08/trump-reveals-shocking-social-security-data-involving-illegal-immigrants/
>
> https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/05/12-3-million-people-over-120-years-old-removed-from-social-security-rolls-by-trump-admin/
While slightly less biased, its source is... TRUMP. Not reliable info. No
actual evidence given.
On the latter for example, NO evidence of a single person "over 120" getting a
single penny has been presented.
>
>
>
>
>>> That is now changing as Trump is going to put the able bodied to
>>> work.
>>
>> This is not backed by evidence.
>
>
> Actually so is this.
> https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/jul/09/scott-jennings/reconciliation-bill-medicaid-able-bodied-adults/
Your source (which I accept as reputable though not infallible): FALSE.
Look at your own source. LOL!
>
>>>
>>> Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
>>
>> Who cares?
>
> You do Mr. Snit
False claim. You do not speak for me.
>>>
>>> Is snit from Usenet a grifter
>>
>> Biased prompt. Not interested.
>
> Nope.
I truly am not. You are trolling... and your lies and biased prompts are proof
of that.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mike Oxbrown" <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 00:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <107r75r$20lfd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2528 |
Brock McNuggets wrote:
> On Aug 16, 2025 at 3:55:59 PM MST, ""Mike Oxbrown"" wrote
> <107r29v$1vnjm$1@dont-email.me>:
>
> > Brock McNuggets wrote:
> >
> >> On Aug 16, 2025 at 3:11:07 PM MST, ""Mike Oxbrown"" wrote
> >> <107qvlr$1v2ie$1@dont-email.me>:
> >>
> >>> Brock McNuggets wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Ron Howard has summed up what many of us believe. Including
> me.... >>>> 1. I believe a country should take care of its weakest
> members. >>> What a load of hooey.
> >>
> >> You can disagree... but it is rejection of this that is A key to
> why >> the US is collapsing around us.
> >
> > The US is collapsing around us due to liberal, democrat policies
> > such as
> >
> > . Defund the police
> > . Soft on crime policies
> > . Unchecked immigration bankrupting cities like Portland, chicago,
> > NY. .Massive numbers of people entering the country through what
> > are basically open borders.
> > . woke policies
> > . Males participating in women's sports.
> > . A University system that has become a huge indoctrination
> > apparatus.
> >
> > All a result of far left democrats using Joe Biden to pass
> > legislation harmful to the country as a whole.
>
> The U.S. is struggling, but not because of "woke" slogans -- more
> because we've got a wannabe strongman running a personality cult,
> echoing fascist playbooks right out of 1930s Europe.
Fuck all you are a brainwashed moron Mr. Snit
Really?
You might wish to retract that claim as even left leaning MSNBC claims
Trump is not a facist, and he is not.
<https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/opinion-donald-trump-is-not-a-fascist-why-that-label-is-inaccurate/ar-AA1uvZ9U>
"""Opinion: Donald Trump is not a fascist. Why that label is
inaccurate."""
"""Opinion: Donald Trump is not a fascist. Why that label is
inaccurate."""
> "Defund the police"? Yeah, that was a dumb slogan, but the idea was
> about shifting some resources to mental health and social services,
> not abolishing cops. Actual police funding increased under Biden.
You cannot be serious.
Funding for WHAT?
Social workers responding to domestic abuse calls?
Now that's something you have personal experience with, right snit?
> Crime? Rising in 2020, now falling fast. Immigration? Straining some
> city budgets, yes, but "open borders" and "bankrupt" are just
> campaign buzzwords.
Crime statistics are being manipulated, especially in big cities.
Ask the people of Chicago or NYC what they think of the crime increases.
<https://www.stopspying.org/latest-news/2024/6/12/stop-report-shows-nypd-manipulates-crime-data>
<https://whitecollarfraud.com/2024/11/18/how-new-yorks-crime-statistics-became-a-political-fairy-tale/>
<https://www.reuters.com/article/world/us/nypd-report-confirms-manipulation-of-crime-stats-idUSBRE828187/>
<https://justjournalism.org/curricula/new-york-police-department-manipulates-crime-reports-study-finds>
And of course there is DC as well. This one is a doozie.
<https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/dc-police-commander-suspended-crime-statistics/3959566/>
> And no -- it's not accurate to say "males in women's sports." Trans
> women are women; the number competing at elite levels is vanishingly
> small, and the NCAA and others have eligibility rules.
When you are a female and have worked your entire life to become a
world class athlete only to have that honor taken away from you by some
male pretending to be a woman it's not "small" as you say.
When you sustain life altering injuries in a volleyball match because a
male pretending to be a female spikes the ball in your face with force
that a female could never achieve it's not "small" as you say.
> Universities? Some bias and free speech tension, sure, but calling
> them indoctrination camps is culture war theater. The big issue is
> the right wing's hatred of education. They thrive in ignorance.
Really?
You might wish to look at this recent study.
<https://libertyunyielding.com/2025/08/13/88-percent-of-students-at-two-leading-schools-pretend-to-have-more-progressive-views-than-they-actually-have/>
<https://hotair.com/david-strom/2025/08/14/smart-9-in-10-students-say-they-lie-about-their-views-to-fit-in-during-college-n3805783>
You have no argument with this one Mr. Snit.
> So if America is collapsing, it's less from liberal policies and more
> from a fascist-leaning oligarch and his enablers who are "soft on
> crime" when it's their guy racking up 91 felony counts. Law and
> order, apparently, only applies to everyone else.
Wrong.
Simple question,. when did America begin it's decline?
Answer is: literally to the day Joe Biden took office.
Law and order obviously doesn't apply to the Biden family.
Or Hillary
Or Bill Clinton.
And before you spit up the standard uneducated response about
investigations not finding anything, consider that those investigations
were performed by the deep state protecting these people and it's all
coming out now.
> >>> the problem is while there are those who need care, help, some
> >>> assistance recovering from a life tragedy, illness etc, there are
> >>> also an extreme number of people who are professional welfare
> >>> chaeats and the government is quite inept at tracking them down.
> >>
> >> This is not backed by evidence.
> >
> > Actually it is.
> >
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/donald-trump-social-security-illegal-immigrants/2025/08/14/id/1222508/
>
>
https://adfontesmedia.com/national-report-bias-and-reliability/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
> -----
> Bias: Hyper-Partisan Right
> Reliability: Unreliable, Problematic
Classic lefty playbook when they don't like the facts.
The statements are factual and if they were not it would be all over
the media.
It's not.
Keep spinning.
-----
>
> Facts matter to me.
Really?
You don't seem to have any.
> >
> >
https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/08/trump-reveals-shocking-social-security-data-involving-illegal-immigrants/
> >
> >
https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/05/12-3-million-people-over-120-years-old-removed-from-social-security-rolls-by-trump-admin/
>
> While slightly less biased, its source is... TRUMP. Not reliable
> info. No actual evidence given.
>
> On the latter for example, NO evidence of a single person "over 120"
> getting a single penny has been presented.
Yawn.
You just don't like the numbers.
Do you actually believe the government is going to release specific
names on this?
If so, they should start with you Mr. snit because Chatgpt has analyzed
you as a grifter.
Wear your label like a true scammer.
> >
> >
> >
> >>> That is now changing as Trump is going to put the able bodied to
> >>> work.
> >>
> >> This is not backed by evidence.
> >
> >
> > Actually so is this.
> >
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/jul/09/scott-jennings/reconciliation-bill-medicaid-able-bodied-adults/
>
> Your source (which I accept as reputable though not infallible):
> FALSE.
>
> Look at your own source. LOL!
> >
> >>>
> >>> Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
> >>
> >> Who cares?
> >
> > You do Mr. Snit
>
> False claim. You do not speak for me.
>
> >>>
> >>> Is snit from Usenet a grifter
> >>
> >> Biased prompt. Not interested.
> >
> > Nope.
>
> I truly am not. You are trolling... and your lies and biased prompts
> are proof of that.
Yet you snipped what ChatGPT came up with regarding a very simple
question:
"Is snit from Usenet a grifter?"
It seems you only like Chatgpt when it provides answers you agree with.
BTW, I ran several more simple queries against you snit and I have yet
to come up with anything positive.
It seems that even ChatGPT realizes that you are a piece of shit, snit.
One more time, here is what you keep snipping Mr. Snit.
"""
Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit.
Is snit from Usenet a grifter
ChatGPT said:
You're asking whether "Snit" from Usenet is a grifter. Based on the
evidence, the answer seems to be yes, or at least he has been widely
characterized that way.
What's the story behind "Snit"?
Identity: The person known as Snit has been associated with Michael
Glasser of Prescott, Arizona, also dubbed the "Prescott Computer Guy"
and labeled a "con artist" and "Usenet lying troll"
Google Groups
.
Behavior on Usenet: Multiple users across Usenet newsgroups (like
comp.os.linux.advocacy) have compiled stories and posts alleging
deception, trolling, use of sock puppet accounts, and manipulation, all
contributing to the notion that Snit is not just a prankster—he's a
serial troll with a history spanning decades
Rocksolid BBS
+1
.
Another snippet goes even further, describing Snit as someone who
“doesn't handle reality well” and has made others look like saints,
implying manipulative or deceptive behavior
Rocksolid BBS
.
What does that imply?
The repeated use of terms like "con artist", "lying troll", and
references to a long-standing pattern of deceit suggest that Snit is
indeed viewed by many as a grifter—someone who deceives or manipulates
others for personal gain, prestige, or the thrill of it.
If your intent is to find if there are verified legal or formal
charges, the sources available are anecdotal Usenet discussions and
personal accusations—not official documentation or legal proceedings.
Summary
Yes, the prevailing view in Usenet communities is that Snit—presumably
Michael Glasser—acts like a grifter or troll, engaging in deceptive
practices, misinformation, and manipulative behavior.
If you're looking for more context—like specific posts, evidence, or
whether this behavior has been proven legally—let me know and I can dig
deeper!
> >
> > Is snit from Usenet a grifter
>
> Biased prompt. Not interested.
Nope.
It's a simple question asking for an analysis and it has you pegged Mr.
Snit.
You can't hide from your past or future."""
Here it is again.
--
MoX
"Trump’s IQ of 82 is destroying the world. Could there possibly be a
bigger idiot on the planet?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 01:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68a12fe3$0$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #2529 |
On Aug 16, 2025 at 5:19:07 PM MST, ""Mike Oxbrown"" wrote <107r75r$20lfd$1@dont-email.me>: > Brock McNuggets wrote: > >> On Aug 16, 2025 at 3:55:59 PM MST, ""Mike Oxbrown"" wrote >> <107r29v$1vnjm$1@dont-email.me>: >> >>> Brock McNuggets wrote: >>> >>>> On Aug 16, 2025 at 3:11:07 PM MST, ""Mike Oxbrown"" wrote >>>> <107qvlr$1v2ie$1@dont-email.me>: >>>> >>>>> Brock McNuggets wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Ron Howard has summed up what many of us believe. Including >> me.... >>>> 1. I believe a country should take care of its weakest >> members. >>> What a load of hooey. >>>> >>>> You can disagree... but it is rejection of this that is A key to >> why >> the US is collapsing around us. >>> >>> The US is collapsing around us due to liberal, democrat policies >>> such as >>> >>> . Defund the police >>> . Soft on crime policies >>> . Unchecked immigration bankrupting cities like Portland, chicago, >>> NY. .Massive numbers of people entering the country through what >>> are basically open borders. >>> . woke policies >>> . Males participating in women's sports. >>> . A University system that has become a huge indoctrination >>> apparatus. >>> >>> All a result of far left democrats using Joe Biden to pass >>> legislation harmful to the country as a whole. >> >> The U.S. is struggling, but not because of "woke" slogans -- more >> because we've got a wannabe strongman running a personality cult, >> echoing fascist playbooks right out of 1930s Europe. > > Fuck all you are a brainwashed moron Mr. Snit > Really? > > You might wish to retract that claim as even left leaning MSNBC claims > Trump is not a facist, and he is not. Why would he push fascist policies then? And why are you looking to MSNBC, the second least reliable news source (Fox being the least reliable)? This is what it means to be a fascist: * Centralizes power -- They try to weaken or eliminate democratic checks and balances, consolidating authority in themselves or a small ruling elite. * Demands loyalty and obedience -- Personal devotion to the leader or the "nation" is expected, often above law, reason, or individual rights. * Uses nationalism and myth -- They build up a strong national identity, often tied to an idealized past, symbols, or myths. Outsiders or "enemies within" (immigrants, minorities, dissenters) are blamed for problems. * Glorifies violence and strength -- Violence is framed as cleansing or necessary. Military, police, and paramilitary groups are celebrated and used to enforce control. * Suppresses opposition -- Free press, unions, political rivals, and intellectuals are censored, harassed, or outright eliminated. * Controls culture and information -- Media, education, and art are shaped to promote propaganda and the leader's ideology. * Pushes collectivism over individuality -- The individual is less important than the nation, state, or "people's will," as defined by the leader. Trump does those things. He *IS* a fascist. > > <https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/opinion-donald-trump-is-not-a-fascist-why-that-label-is-inaccurate/ar-AA1uvZ9U> > > """Opinion: Donald Trump is not a fascist. Why that label is > inaccurate.""" > > """Opinion: Donald Trump is not a fascist. Why that label is > inaccurate.""" > > >> "Defund the police"? Yeah, that was a dumb slogan, but the idea was >> about shifting some resources to mental health and social services, >> not abolishing cops. Actual police funding increased under Biden. You have no actual response. Your white flag is. > > You cannot be serious. > Funding for WHAT? > Social workers responding to domestic abuse calls? > Now that's something you have personal experience with, right snit? >> Crime? Rising in 2020, now falling fast. Immigration? Straining some >> city budgets, yes, but "open borders" and "bankrupt" are just >> campaign buzzwords. > > Crime statistics are being manipulated, especially in big cities. More than in the past? Evidence to back your claims. None. Your white flag is noted. > Ask the people of Chicago or NYC what they think of the crime increases. > > <https://www.stopspying.org/latest-news/2024/6/12/stop-report-shows-nypd-manipulates-crime-data> > > <https://whitecollarfraud.com/2024/11/18/how-new-yorks-crime-statistics-became-a-political-fairy-tale/> > > <https://www.reuters.com/article/world/us/nypd-report-confirms-manipulation-of-crime-stats-idUSBRE828187/> > > > <https://justjournalism.org/curricula/new-york-police-department-manipulates-crime-reports-study-finds> > > > And of course there is DC as well. This one is a doozie. > <https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/dc-police-commander-suspended-crime-statistics/3959566/> > > > > > > >> And no -- it's not accurate to say "males in women's sports." Trans >> women are women; the number competing at elite levels is vanishingly >> small, and the NCAA and others have eligibility rules. > > When you are a female and have worked your entire life to become a > world class athlete only to have that honor taken away from you by some > male pretending to be a woman it's not "small" as you say. There are precisely ZERO examples of this happening. None. Not one. Ever. Try again. > > When you sustain life altering injuries in a volleyball match because a > male pretending to be a female spikes the ball in your face with force > that a female could never achieve it's not "small" as you say. Again: ZERO examples of this. Ever. Your white flag is noted. > > >> Universities? Some bias and free speech tension, sure, but calling >> them indoctrination camps is culture war theater. The big issue is >> the right wing's hatred of education. They thrive in ignorance. > > Really? Yes. > You might wish to look at this recent study. > > <https://libertyunyielding.com/2025/08/13/88-percent-of-students-at-two-leading-schools-pretend-to-have-more-progressive-views-than-they-actually-have/> > > <https://hotair.com/david-strom/2025/08/14/smart-9-in-10-students-say-they-lie-about-their-views-to-fit-in-during-college-n3805783> > > You have no argument with this one Mr. Snit. You have ZERO evidence to show what you claimed. And, yes, the right wing hates education -- look at how they seek to defund it. > > > > > >> So if America is collapsing, it's less from liberal policies and more >> from a fascist-leaning oligarch and his enablers who are "soft on >> crime" when it's their guy racking up 91 felony counts. Law and >> order, apparently, only applies to everyone else. > > Wrong. Nope. Trump has a bunch of felonies. Right wingers care not one whit about crime. THEY are soft on crime. > Simple question,. when did America begin it's decline? 1980s under Reagan. That was easy. Look at how the middle class declined and the connection between productivity and financial output broke. > Answer is: literally to the day Joe Biden took office. You have no evidence of this. > > Law and order obviously doesn't apply to the Biden family. > Or Hillary > Or Bill Clinton. I have no love for them, but they do not have the felonies Trump does. > > And before you spit up the standard uneducated response about > investigations not finding anything, consider that those investigations > were performed by the deep state protecting these people and it's all > coming out now. Your conspiracy nonsense, and white flag, are noted. > > >>>>> the problem is while there are those who need care, help, some >>>>> assistance recovering from a life tragedy, illness etc, there are >>>>> also an extreme number of people who are professional welfare >>>>> chaeats and the government is quite inept at tracking them down. >>>> >>>> This is not backed by evidence. >>> >>> Actually it is. >>> > https://www.newsmax.com/politics/donald-trump-social-security-illegal-immigrants/2025/08/14/id/1222508/ Already responded to. >> >> > https://adfontesmedia.com/national-report-bias-and-reliability/?utm_source=chatgpt.com >> ----- >> Bias: Hyper-Partisan Right >> Reliability: Unreliable, Problematic > > Classic lefty playbook when they don't like the facts. I am noting I want facts. Not unreliable bias. > The statements are factual and if they were not it would be all over > the media. > It's not. No support for this claim. > > Keep spinning. > > > ----- >> >> Facts matter to me. > > Really? > You don't seem to have any. Your white flag is noted. > > >>> >>> > https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/08/trump-reveals-shocking-social-security-data-involving-illegal-immigrants/ >>> >>> > https://americanmilitarynews.com/2025/05/12-3-million-people-over-120-years-old-removed-from-social-security-rolls-by-trump-admin/ >> >> While slightly less biased, its source is... TRUMP. Not reliable >> info. No actual evidence given. >> >> On the latter for example, NO evidence of a single person "over 120" >> getting a single penny has been presented. > > Yawn. > You just don't like the numbers. Still no evidence of a single person "over 120" getting a single cent. Your white flag is noted. > Do you actually believe the government is going to release specific > names on this? I am noting you have no evidence. > If so, they should start with you Mr. snit because Chatgpt has analyzed > you as a grifter. > Wear your label like a true scammer. That is the level of your evidence. Agreed. It is nothing. > > > > > >>> >>> >>> >>>>> That is now changing as Trump is going to put the able bodied to >>>>> work. >>>> >>>> This is not backed by evidence. >>> >>> >>> Actually so is this. >>> > https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/jul/09/scott-jennings/reconciliation-bill-medicaid-able-bodied-adults/ >> >> Your source (which I accept as reputable though not infallible): >> FALSE. >> >> Look at your own source. LOL! >>> >>>>> >>>>> Chatgpt does not speak highly of you snit. >>>> >>>> Who cares? >>> >>> You do Mr. Snit >> >> False claim. You do not speak for me. >> >>>>> >>>>> Is snit from Usenet a grifter >>>> >>>> Biased prompt. Not interested. >>> >>> Nope. >> >> I truly am not. You are trolling... and your lies and biased prompts >> are proof of that. > > Yet you snipped what ChatGPT came up with regarding a very simple > question: > "Is snit from Usenet a grifter?" Your personal attacks are your white flag. Accepted. -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 11:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <82u3ak5c0hcrpu24egm588fn2o08rji2ko@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2526 |
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 22:55:59 -0000 (UTC), "Mike Oxbrown" <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> wrote: >The US is collapsing around us due to liberal, democrat policies such >as > >. Defund the police Cite Democrats actually defunding police. I dare you. Show where this has actually happened. Meanwhile, "House backers of proposed cuts to federal law enforcement see Johnson as an ally" <https://rollcall.com/2023/11/14/house-backers-of-proposed-cuts-to-federal-law-enforcement-see-johnson-as-an-ally/> "House Republicans Defund Law Enforcement, Make America Less Safe" <https://democrats-appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/house-republicans-defund-law-enforcement-make-america-less-safe> "FACT SHEET: 80% of House Republicans Propose Defunding COPS as President Biden Insists on Funding the Police" <https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/fact-sheet-80-house-republicans-propose-defunding-cops-president-biden-insists-funding-the> "The term “defunding police'' arose after the 2020 killing of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. Many advocates say it does not mean abolishing police, but rather reallocating some of the money and the duties that have traditionally been handled by police departments. For example, instead of dispatching police for routine calls involving drug abuse or mental health issues, advocates say it would be better to send officials from social service departments who have training in treating people with those problems. Some of the funds going to police, they say, would be better spent treating mental illness and addiction. Theoretically, that would allow police to put more focus on violent crime." <https://www.vpm.org/news/2021-07-22/politifact-va-no-republicans-didnt-vote-to-defund-the-police> "The spending package pushed through the House on Wednesday by Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) cuts the FBI’s operating budget by 6 percent, siphoning much-needed resources away from the nation’s premier police agency. And the measure cuts funding for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) — which, among other roles, is instrumental in battling gun violence and terrorism — by 7 percent." <https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/117349/documents/HHRG-118-JU00-20240523-SD002.pdf> -- Superman is an illegal immigrant! 8647
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-17 17:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68a2162d$3$27$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #2539 |
On Aug 17, 2025 at 8:51:39 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote <82u3ak5c0hcrpu24egm588fn2o08rji2ko@4ax.com>: > On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 22:55:59 -0000 (UTC), "Mike Oxbrown" > <idunnomyemailaddress@aol.com> wrote: > >> The US is collapsing around us due to liberal, democrat policies such >> as >> >> . Defund the police > > Cite Democrats actually defunding police. I dare you. Show where > this has actually happened. <crickets> > > Meanwhile, > > "House backers of proposed cuts to federal law enforcement see Johnson > as an ally" > <https://rollcall.com/2023/11/14/house-backers-of-proposed-cuts-to-federal-law-enforcement-see-johnson-as-an-ally/> > > "House Republicans Defund Law Enforcement, Make America Less Safe" > <https://democrats-appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/house-republicans-defund-law-enforcement-make-america-less-safe> > > "FACT SHEET: 80% of House Republicans Propose Defunding COPS as > President Biden Insists on Funding the Police" > <https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/fact-sheet-80-house-republicans-propose-defunding-cops-president-biden-insists-funding-the> > > "The term defunding police'' arose after the 2020 killing of George > Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. Many advocates say it does not > mean abolishing police, but rather reallocating some of the money and > the duties that have traditionally been handled by police departments. > > For example, instead of dispatching police for routine calls involving > drug abuse or mental health issues, advocates say it would be better > to send officials from social service departments who have training in > treating people with those problems. Some of the funds going to > police, they say, would be better spent treating mental illness and > addiction. Theoretically, that would allow police to put more focus on > violent crime." > <https://www.vpm.org/news/2021-07-22/politifact-va-no-republicans-didnt-vote-to-defund-the-police> > > > "The spending package pushed through the House on Wednesday by Speaker > Mike Johnson (R-La.) cuts the FBIs operating budget by 6 percent, > siphoning much-needed resources away from the nations premier police > agency. And the measure cuts funding for the Bureau of Alcohol, > Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) which, among other roles, is > instrumental in battling gun violence and terrorism by 7 percent." > <https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/117349/documents/HHRG-118-JU00-20240523-SD002.pdf> Excellent info. Thanks. -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-18 16:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fj47akh8ir3f05tvh2n0or765rfnkqs12n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2540 |
Brock McNuggets wrote: >> "House backers of proposed cuts to federal law enforcement see Johnson >> as an ally" >> <https://rollcall.com/2023/11/14/house-backers-of-proposed-cuts-to-federal-law-enforcement-see-johnson-as-an-ally/> >> >> "House Republicans Defund Law Enforcement, Make America Less Safe" >> <https://democrats-appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/house-republicans-defund-law-enforcement-make-america-less-safe> >> >> "FACT SHEET: 80% of House Republicans Propose Defunding COPS as >> President Biden Insists on Funding the Police" >> <https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/fact-sheet-80-house-republicans-propose-defunding-cops-president-biden-insists-funding-the> "Community Oriented Policing Services" (COPS) are not regular police. They are the "police substitute" that leftists push. None of your cites shows republicans wanting to defund regular, state and local police. Only federal agencies which have become bloated and politically biased. As for what cities "defunded" the police, many of them did, only to later reverse themselves after crime shot up. (Gosh, who would have seen that coming? Not a leftist, I guess.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defund_the_police -- "Human cognitive ability cannot efficiently compare more than five options" - "-hh"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-18 18:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <eu97akhoqckpgo97t2uhetq3id7h14dju6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2552 |
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:04:30 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >Brock McNuggets wrote: > >>> "House backers of proposed cuts to federal law enforcement see Johnson >>> as an ally" >>> <https://rollcall.com/2023/11/14/house-backers-of-proposed-cuts-to-federal-law-enforcement-see-johnson-as-an-ally/> >>> >>> "House Republicans Defund Law Enforcement, Make America Less Safe" >>> <https://democrats-appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/house-republicans-defund-law-enforcement-make-america-less-safe> >>> >>> "FACT SHEET: 80% of House Republicans Propose Defunding COPS as >>> President Biden Insists on Funding the Police" >>> <https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/fact-sheet-80-house-republicans-propose-defunding-cops-president-biden-insists-funding-the> > >"Community Oriented Policing Services" (COPS) are not regular police. >They are the "police substitute" that leftists push. None of your >cites shows republicans wanting to defund regular, state and local >police. Only federal agencies which have become bloated and >politically biased. > >As for what cities "defunded" the police, many of them did, only to >later reverse themselves after crime shot up. (Gosh, who would have >seen that coming? Not a leftist, I guess.) > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defund_the_police Then you should have no problem telling us the cities and specifics of those defunding efforts. Dumping a generic Wikipedia link doesn't count. From that link YOU provided: "A 2024 study found no evidence of significant police defunding in major U.S. cities following the George Floyd protests, while cities with higher Republican vote shares often increased police budgets. According to The New York Times, the movement has failed to achieve substantial policy change, partly due to a lack of clear goals. The slogan itself was deemed unpopular and used to portray activists as lenient on crime." So, where is your cite for the cities that DID defund? ----->___________________ -- Superman is an illegal immigrant! 8647
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-18 22:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68a3ac67$0$4127$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #2553 |
On Aug 18, 2025 at 3:26:30 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote <eu97akhoqckpgo97t2uhetq3id7h14dju6@4ax.com>: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:04:30 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> > wrote: > >> Brock McNuggets wrote: >> >>>> "House backers of proposed cuts to federal law enforcement see Johnson >>>> as an ally" >>>> <https://rollcall.com/2023/11/14/house-backers-of-proposed-cuts-to-federal-law-enforcement-see-johnson-as-an-ally/> >>>> >>>> "House Republicans Defund Law Enforcement, Make America Less Safe" >>>> <https://democrats-appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/house-republicans-defund-law-enforcement-make-america-less-safe> >>>> >>>> "FACT SHEET: 80% of House Republicans Propose Defunding COPS as >>>> President Biden Insists on Funding the Police" >>>> <https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/fact-sheet-80-house-republicans-propose-defunding-cops-president-biden-insists-funding-the> >> >> "Community Oriented Policing Services" (COPS) are not regular police. >> They are the "police substitute" that leftists push. None of your >> cites shows republicans wanting to defund regular, state and local >> police. Only federal agencies which have become bloated and >> politically biased. >> >> As for what cities "defunded" the police, many of them did, only to >> later reverse themselves after crime shot up. (Gosh, who would have >> seen that coming? Not a leftist, I guess.) >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defund_the_police > > Then you should have no problem telling us the cities and specifics of > those defunding efforts. > > Dumping a generic Wikipedia link doesn't count. > > From that link YOU provided: > > "A 2024 study found no evidence of significant police defunding in > major U.S. cities following the George Floyd protests, while cities > with higher Republican vote shares often increased police budgets. > According to The New York Times, the movement has failed to achieve > substantial policy change, partly due to a lack of clear goals. The > slogan itself was deemed unpopular and used to portray activists as > lenient on crime." > > So, where is your cite for the cities that DID defund? > > ----->___________________ Partisans often do not care about facts. -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-18 16:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1080dep$3ee7g$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2553 |
Governor Swill wrote: >> As for what cities "defunded" the police, many of them did, only to >> >later reverse themselves after crime shot up. (Gosh, who would have >> >seen that coming? Not a leftist, I guess.) >> > >> >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defund_the_police > Then you should have no problem telling us the cities and specifics of > those defunding efforts. Beatings will continue until morale improves. Evil science show beatings does not get the best results. Some people just need help with job skills and emotional controls. Minor conflicts can often be resolved by having a social worker getting people to tal to each other. John Wayne never showed mercy to bad men. He knew better than mamby pamby liberals and cowards like Quakers. -- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @ Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\ The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \ of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-19 02:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <la68aktbeo45catdgsgife8820jplh5h2b@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2553 |
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:26:30 -0400, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:04:30 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> >wrote: > >>Brock McNuggets wrote: >> >>>> "House backers of proposed cuts to federal law enforcement see Johnson >>>> as an ally" >>>> <https://rollcall.com/2023/11/14/house-backers-of-proposed-cuts-to-federal-law-enforcement-see-johnson-as-an-ally/> >>>> >>>> "House Republicans Defund Law Enforcement, Make America Less Safe" >>>> <https://democrats-appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/house-republicans-defund-law-enforcement-make-america-less-safe> >>>> >>>> "FACT SHEET: 80% of House Republicans Propose Defunding COPS as >>>> President Biden Insists on Funding the Police" >>>> <https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/fact-sheet-80-house-republicans-propose-defunding-cops-president-biden-insists-funding-the> >> >>"Community Oriented Policing Services" (COPS) are not regular police. >>They are the "police substitute" that leftists push. None of your >>cites shows republicans wanting to defund regular, state and local >>police. Only federal agencies which have become bloated and >>politically biased. >> >>As for what cities "defunded" the police, many of them did, only to >>later reverse themselves after crime shot up. (Gosh, who would have >>seen that coming? Not a leftist, I guess.) >> >>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defund_the_police > >Then you should have no problem telling us the cities and specifics of >those defunding efforts. > >Dumping a generic Wikipedia link doesn't count. > >From that link YOU provided: > >"A 2024 study found no evidence of significant police defunding in >major U.S. cities following the George Floyd protests, while cities >with higher Republican vote shares often increased police budgets. >According to The New York Times, the movement has failed to achieve >substantial policy change, partly due to a lack of clear goals. The >slogan itself was deemed unpopular and used to portray activists as >lenient on crime." > >So, where is your cite for the cities that DID defund? > >----->___________________ Watching ChrisV running away after he got caught trying to lie. -- Superman is an illegal immigrant! 8647
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-19 08:47 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0av8ak5lp27m6mfiqaficm10kg743q0t03@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2557 |
Governor Swill wrote: >Watching ChrisV running away after he got caught trying to lie. Fuck you, you piece of shit. I was going to respond politey to your earlier message, until I saw this. Only a liar would claim that there was any "trying to lie" in my post of yesterday. It's you who are the proven liar, here. Multiple times, and now again. New York, Los Angeles, San Fransisco, Minneapolis get their own sections in the article I cited. Then under other U.S. cities: "In 2020, local policymakers in Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, D.C., San Francisco and other major US cities have supported some form of defunding or opposing budget increases. But all those cities have reversed their stance of defunding their local police departments after historic crime spikes following 2020." Just as I said. You were proven wrong. Your response will be deleted, unread. Prick.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-19 14:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68a4890c$1$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #2558 |
On Aug 19, 2025 at 6:47:07 AM MST, "chrisv" wrote <0av8ak5lp27m6mfiqaficm10kg743q0t03@4ax.com>: > Governor Swill wrote: > >> Watching ChrisV running away after he got caught trying to lie. > > Fuck you, you piece of shit. I was going to respond politey to your > earlier message, until I saw this. > > Only a liar would claim that there was any "trying to lie" in my post > of yesterday. > > It's you who are the proven liar, here. Multiple times, and now > again. He shows evidence. > > New York, Los Angeles, San Fransisco, Minneapolis get their own > sections in the article I cited. Then under other U.S. cities: > > "In 2020, local policymakers in Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, > D.C., San Francisco and other major US cities have supported some form > of defunding or opposing budget increases. The word "or" has a meaning. > But all those cities have > reversed their stance of defunding their local police departments > after historic crime spikes following 2020." > > Just as I said. You were proven wrong. > > Your response will be deleted, unread. Prick. You ignored his reply. You ran. Of course. -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-19 11:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mu29aktdpd5a8rgv84mrfnmdp30ruj8mnr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2558 |
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:47:07 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >Governor Swill wrote: > >>Watching ChrisV running away after he got caught trying to lie. > >Fuck you, you piece of shit. Hit a nerve? >I was going to respond politey to your >earlier message, until I saw this. Suuuure you were. You had to be goaded into it after failing to prove that multiple cities defunded the police as a response to the George Floyd protests. You can't count anything that happened in 2020 in any sort of research as it was such a unique year. Btw, crime increases for that year were not due to less policing but to people being forced to stay together at home for extended periods with few ways of getting out and venting. Mom and Dad didn't go to work everyday, the kids didn't go to school every day and the family didn't go out once or twice a week for quality time. Instead, families stayed cooped up together at home 24/7. The only crime increases were for violent crimes including murder and assault which were up almost 6% while while proprty crimes fell almost 8%. Iow, total crimes DROPPED in 2020. You're supposed to form your opinions and beliefs on the facts, not cherry pick the facts to fit your preconceived beliefs and prejudices. >Only a liar would claim that there was any "trying to lie" in my post >of yesterday. You claimed that "cities" had defunded the police and that crime had shot up as a result. You then provided as a cite <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defund_the_police> which does not list ANY cities that defunded the police. What they did was cut local spending due to revenue losses which, in many cases, was made up with Federal COVID stimulus spending directly on LEO and first responder jobs. Further investigation shows that the voters in Portland, OR demanded policing reductions only to see them reinstated a year later. Clue: Portland, OR is not "cities". Yes, you tried to pull a fast one and your denials to the contrary just make you look even more craven to those who honestly read the facts. PS: You STILL have not cited "cities" defunding the police and crime shooting up. Why? Because crime actually DROPPED in 2020. >It's you who are the proven liar, here. Multiple times, and now >again. > >New York, Los Angeles, San Fransisco, Minneapolis get their own >sections in the article I cited. Then under other U.S. cities: > >"In 2020, local policymakers in Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, >D.C., San Francisco and other major US cities have supported some form >of defunding or opposing budget increases. But all those cities have >reversed their stance of defunding their local police departments >after historic crime spikes following 2020." I have already addressed this. To repeat, in 2020, cops and firefighters faced layoffs due to shrinking revenue streams across the country. So yes, cuts were discussed and made locally for budgetary reasons. Not as a george-floyd experiment as you insinuate. However, part of the federal COVID stimulus was spent to keep those workers in place so cuts were minimized, occurred only for the COVID year and local spending was restored following COVID. Additionally, using 2020, the COVID year as a reference for anything is disingenuous at best. It was an outlier year with it's own unique situations. That the right has pretended otherwise shows how desperate you are to make hay out of old newspapers. >Just as I said. You were proven wrong. > >Your response will be deleted, unread. Good. Then I'll have the last word. >Prick. LOL! You peeked! -- Superman is an illegal immigrant! 8647
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-08-19 15:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <68a49268$2$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #2562 |
On Aug 19, 2025 at 8:01:16 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote <mu29aktdpd5a8rgv84mrfnmdp30ruj8mnr@4ax.com>: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:47:07 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> > wrote: > >> Governor Swill wrote: >> >>> Watching ChrisV running away after he got caught trying to lie. >> >> Fuck you, you piece of shit. > > Hit a nerve? > >> I was going to respond politey to your >> earlier message, until I saw this. > > Suuuure you were. You had to be goaded into it after failing to prove > that multiple cities defunded the police as a response to the George > Floyd protests. You can't count anything that happened in 2020 in any > sort of research as it was such a unique year. > > Btw, crime increases for that year were not due to less policing but > to people being forced to stay together at home for extended periods > with few ways of getting out and venting. Mom and Dad didn't go to > work everyday, the kids didn't go to school every day and the family > didn't go out once or twice a week for quality time. Instead, > families stayed cooped up together at home 24/7. > > The only crime increases were for violent crimes including murder and > assault which were up almost 6% while while proprty crimes fell almost > 8%. Iow, total crimes DROPPED in 2020. > > You're supposed to form your opinions and beliefs on the facts, not > cherry pick the facts to fit your preconceived beliefs and prejudices. > >> Only a liar would claim that there was any "trying to lie" in my post >> of yesterday. > > You claimed that "cities" had defunded the police and that crime had > shot up as a result. You then provided as a cite > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defund_the_police> > which does not list ANY cities that defunded the police. > > What they did was cut local spending due to revenue losses which, in > many cases, was made up with Federal COVID stimulus spending directly > on LEO and first responder jobs. Further investigation shows that the > voters in Portland, OR demanded policing reductions only to see them > reinstated a year later. > > Clue: Portland, OR is not "cities". > > Yes, you tried to pull a fast one and your denials to the contrary > just make you look even more craven to those who honestly read the > facts. > > PS: You STILL have not cited "cities" defunding the police and crime > shooting up. Why? Because crime actually DROPPED in 2020. > >> It's you who are the proven liar, here. Multiple times, and now >> again. >> >> New York, Los Angeles, San Fransisco, Minneapolis get their own >> sections in the article I cited. Then under other U.S. cities: >> >> "In 2020, local policymakers in Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, >> D.C., San Francisco and other major US cities have supported some form >> of defunding or opposing budget increases. But all those cities have >> reversed their stance of defunding their local police departments >> after historic crime spikes following 2020." > > I have already addressed this. To repeat, in 2020, cops and > firefighters faced layoffs due to shrinking revenue streams across the > country. So yes, cuts were discussed and made locally for budgetary > reasons. Not as a george-floyd experiment as you insinuate. However, > part of the federal COVID stimulus was spent to keep those workers in > place so cuts were minimized, occurred only for the COVID year and > local spending was restored following COVID. > > Additionally, using 2020, the COVID year as a reference for anything > is disingenuous at best. It was an outlier year with it's own unique > situations. That the right has pretended otherwise shows how > desperate you are to make hay out of old newspapers. > >> Just as I said. You were proven wrong. >> >> Your response will be deleted, unread. > > Good. Then I'll have the last word. > >> Prick. > > LOL! You peeked! Thanks for your fact-filled, patient, and well thought out replies. -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 15 [1] 2 3 … 15 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.locksmithing
csiph-web