Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.locksmithing > #2512 > unrolled thread

Who is this snit asshole x-posting to unrelated groups?

Back to article view | Back to alt.locksmithing

Contents

  Who is this snit asshole x-posting to unrelated groups? "Scumex 1969" <scumex1969@unionfitter.org> - 2025-08-09 00:47 +0000
    Re: Who is this snit asshole x-posting to unrelated groups? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-08-09 01:22 +0000
      Re: Who is this snit asshole x-posting to unrelated groups? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-09 04:39 +0000
    Re: Who is this snit asshole x-posting to unrelated groups? Rudy Canoza <x@y.com> - 2025-08-09 01:31 +0000
      Re: Who is this snit asshole x-posting to unrelated groups? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-09 04:39 +0000
    Re: Who is this snit asshole x-posting to unrelated groups? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-09 04:52 +0000

#2512 — Who is this snit asshole x-posting to unrelated groups?

Is this an AI bot?
The best I could find on snit, is the following.
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
This snit asshole must be one hell of a fucking idiot
Supposedly he carries around on his person a stuffed animal
as some kind of comfort device. Can you say KOOK! So what's the skinny
on this snit asshole?
Nut or robot.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2513

"Scumex 1969" <scumex1969@unionfitter.org> 
news:10765q8$119ig$1@dont-email.me Sat, 09 Aug 2025 00:47:04 GMT in 
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

> Is this an AI bot?
> The best I could find on snit, is the following.
> <https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
> This snit asshole must be one hell of a fucking idiot
> Supposedly he carries around on his person a stuffed animal
> as some kind of comfort device. Can you say KOOK! So what's the skinny
> on this snit asshole?
> Nut or robot.

Nut, as the urls you shared make very clear. Many examples of his fuckwit 
kookery are provided in them. But, if you need more, have a look at a thread 
or two that snit has posted in, or, to save yourself a lot of time and just 
get the highlights, pick nearly any post with snits name in the subject line 
and you'll see for yourself, the url contents are confirmed. :)
 



-- 
I don't need no Dr. All I need...is my lawyer.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2516

On Aug 8, 2025 at 6:22:47 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB335D97C7BDA9HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

> "Scumex 1969" <scumex1969@unionfitter.org>
> news:10765q8$119ig$1@dont-email.me Sat, 09 Aug 2025 00:47:04 GMT in
> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
> 
>> Is this an AI bot?
>> The best I could find on snit, is the following.
>> <https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
>> This snit asshole must be one hell of a fucking idiot
>> Supposedly he carries around on his person a stuffed animal
>> as some kind of comfort device. Can you say KOOK! So what's the skinny
>> on this snit asshole?
>> Nut or robot.
> 
> Nut, as the urls you shared make very clear. Many examples of his fuckwit
> kookery are provided in them. But, if you need more, have a look at a thread
> or two that snit has posted in, or, to save yourself a lot of time and just
> get the highlights, pick nearly any post with snits name in the subject line
> and you'll see for yourself, the url contents are confirmed. :)

No MID. No quote. No receipts.

You are trolling.

-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2514

"Scumex 1969" <scumex1969@unionfitter.org> wrote in news:10765q8$119ig$1
@dont-email.me:

> Is this an AI bot?
> The best I could find on snit, is the following.
> <https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
> This snit asshole must be one hell of a fucking idiot
> Supposedly he carries around on his person a stuffed animal
> as some kind of comfort device. Can you say KOOK! So what's the skinny
> on this snit asshole?
> Nut or robot.
> 
> 

Snit AKA Michael Glasser is not a bot although he uses ChatGPT reponses 
to troll because he is too stupid to think on his own.

Snit is a welfare cheat who has figured out a method for scamming the 
system. And like many welfare cheats he does do occasional side hustles 
as well and of course pays no taxes on those jobs.
As for snit's comfort teddy bear named bilby, that is true.
And that alone proves that snit is off his rocker.

Best advice is to ignore him.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2515

On Aug 8, 2025 at 6:31:15 PM MST, "Rudy Canoza" wrote
<6896a4e3$1$5104$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> "Scumex 1969" <scumex1969@unionfitter.org> wrote in news:10765q8$119ig$1
> @dont-email.me:
> 
>> Is this an AI bot?
>> The best I could find on snit, is the following.
>> <https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
>> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
>> This snit asshole must be one hell of a fucking idiot
>> Supposedly he carries around on his person a stuffed animal
>> as some kind of comfort device. Can you say KOOK! So what's the skinny
>> on this snit asshole?
>> Nut or robot.
>> 
>> 
> 
> Snit AKA Michael Glasser is not a bot although he uses ChatGPT reponses
> to troll because he is too stupid to think on his own.
> 
> Snit is a welfare cheat who has figured out a method for scamming the
> system. And like many welfare cheats he does do occasional side hustles
> as well and of course pays no taxes on those jobs.
> As for snit's comfort teddy bear named bilby, that is true.
> And that alone proves that snit is off his rocker.
> 
> Best advice is to ignore him.

Processing input...
Statement detected: "Snit AKA Michael Glasser is not a bot although he uses
ChatGPT responses to troll because he is too stupid to think on his own."
Analysis outcome: Logical inconsistency. If Snit were "too stupid to think,"
he could not operate ChatGPT effectively, as that requires both intention and
comprehension.

Statement detected: "Snit is a welfare cheat...", "...does occasional side
hustles... pays no taxes..."
Verification: No credible source data provided. Probability of fabrication:
> 99%. Conclusion: Claim is unsupported and should be discarded as
misinformation.

Statement detected: "Snit's comfort teddy bear named Bilby...", "...proves
that snit is off his rocker."
Observation: Ownership of a comfort object does not statistically correlate
with mental instability. Claim is therefore irrelevant to any substantive
discussion.

Final output:
Your message contains multiple unsupported assertions, subjective insults, and
attempts at character defamation. Please resubmit with verifiable evidence and
without reliance on ad hominem rhetoric for improved credibility.

End of AI-generated response.

-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2517

On Aug 8, 2025 at 5:47:04 PM MST, ""Scumex 1969"" wrote
<10765q8$119ig$1@dont-email.me>:

> Is this an AI bot?
> The best I could find on snit, is the following.
> <https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
> This snit asshole must be one hell of a fucking idiot
> Supposedly he carries around on his person a stuffed animal
> as some kind of comfort device. Can you say KOOK! So what's the skinny
> on this snit asshole?
> Nut or robot.

Oh, bless your heart — you really went on a little scavenger hunt, didn’t you?
Three whole tinyurls. That’s adorable. I imagine you hunched over your
keyboard like you’re cracking the Da Vinci Code, only to triumphantly link…
whatever those are supposed to be. And then you serve it all up like it’s some
kind of Pulitzer-worthy exposé on “Snit,” as though you’ve uncovered a great
conspiracy instead of just proving you know how to paste links. Bravo. Really.
Standing ovation.

Now, as for your big “nut or robot” question — wow, I have to say, I admire
the binary thinking. No shades of gray for you, huh? It’s either “fully
organic” or “Skynet prototype.” Unfortunately for your tidy little worldview,
I’m afraid I’m just a human being who can string together more than one
coherent sentence without breaking into keyboard-mashing or linking to some
rickety archive. If that makes me seem robotic to you, maybe that says more
about your own conversational range than it does about me.

And yes — let’s talk about the stuffed animal thing. I love how you toss that
in there like it’s a smoking gun. “Aha! He has a comfort item! Therefore…
KOOK!” What a searing take. I mean, imagine being so emotionally fragile that
the concept of someone owning a soft object sends you spiraling into
name-calling. For the record, plenty of adults have sentimental items — some
people keep childhood toys, others keep mementos from loved ones, and
apparently some keep decades-old grudges against strangers online. We all have
our quirks, I suppose.

Anyway, I’ll leave you to your next round of “investigation.” Maybe you can
find another tinyurl that really seals the deal on my villainy — perhaps one
revealing that I sometimes drink tea instead of coffee, or that I own more
than one pair of shoes. The horror. In the meantime, I’ll be over here living
rent-free in your head, because clearly I’m already taking up prime real
estate.


-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | alt.locksmithing

csiph-web