Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #219113 > unrolled thread

SUSE Reviving Usenet

Started by711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
First post2021-09-29 09:04 -0500
Last post2021-10-12 09:38 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 186 — 42 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers


Contents

  SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-29 09:04 -0500
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-29 14:44 +0000
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-09-30 01:44 -0400
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-09-30 12:25 -0400
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 14:03 -0500
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-09-30 23:36 +0000
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 20:20 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-09-30 14:45 -1000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-01 06:30 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 14:48 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-10-01 13:47 -0400
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-01 17:56 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-01 22:07 -0400
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-01 20:49 +0100
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 22:03 +0000
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-02 10:49 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 15:13 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Mainlander <Mainlander@katamail.com> - 2021-10-02 16:35 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 12:49 -0400
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 13:34 -0700
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 20:04 -0400
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:50 +0000
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-03 05:52 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet chris <chris-nospam@tridac.net> - 2021-10-20 00:00 +0100
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:13 -0500
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:48 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-02 22:23 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-02 16:07 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 18:06 +0100
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-02 19:55 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 22:17 +0100
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-03 08:15 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-10-02 13:29 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-10-02 07:53 -1000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Alan Ralph <usenet@alanralph.co.uk> - 2021-10-02 18:58 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:27 -0500
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Alan Ralph <usenet@alanralph.co.uk> - 2021-10-03 15:34 +0000
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 01:05 -0500
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-10-02 20:04 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2021-10-03 00:24 -0400
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-05 00:13 -0400
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2021-10-05 20:14 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-04 14:17 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-04 16:42 +0100
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-10-04 17:17 +0100
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 16:38 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 16:10 -0400
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-05 00:11 -0400
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 08:31 -0400
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-05 11:34 -0400
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-05 17:31 +0000
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2021-10-06 09:31 +0100
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-08 18:53 -0400
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-05 17:41 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-05 20:58 -0400
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 06:38 +0100
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-05 01:26 -0500
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 08:12 +0100
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-05 03:41 -0500
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-05 23:04 +0000
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-05 06:48 -0700
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-05 14:17 +0000
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-05 23:03 -0500
                              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-06 04:58 +0000
                                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 00:59 -0500
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-04 16:00 -0400
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet David Lesher <wb8foz@panix.com> - 2021-11-25 20:13 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-11-26 04:02 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Geeknix <usenet@apple.geeknix135.net> - 2021-11-26 07:41 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-11-26 21:01 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kurt Weiske" <kurt.weiske@realitycheckbbs.org.remove-vck-this> - 2021-11-26 09:42 -0800
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet sidd@situ.com - 2021-10-16 06:40 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-16 09:14 -0500
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-16 13:19 -0700
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-10-17 17:31 -1000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-10-23 09:52 -1000
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet lawrenabae@abaluon.abaom (Lawrence Statton (NK1G)) - 2021-10-01 16:26 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2021-10-01 23:19 -0500
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2021-09-30 18:38 +0000
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-30 19:26 +0000
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-09-30 21:39 +0200
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:43 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-01 21:32 +0200
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 20:31 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 21:24 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 11:12 -0500
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 18:09 +0100
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-02 18:32 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 20:41 +0100
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:40 -0500
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-03 13:31 +0200
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-03 22:57 -0500
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-04 14:06 +0200
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-04 14:11 +0100
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-05 10:28 +0200
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 10:44 +0100
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-04 14:21 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-04 15:29 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-10-05 11:04 +0200
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet lawrence@cluon.com (Lawrence Statton (NK1G)) - 2021-10-04 13:42 -0500
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ulick Magee <ulickmagee@feckoff.invalid> - 2021-11-09 23:55 +0000
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2021-11-09 20:44 -0600
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-01 06:22 +0100
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 14:55 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-01 17:19 +0100
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-01 17:13 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Mainlander <Mainlander@katamail.com> - 2021-10-02 16:26 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-02 18:11 +0100
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet sidd@situ.com - 2021-10-16 07:01 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Wayne Salamon <xenon@wsalamon.net> - 2021-10-13 18:39 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2021-10-13 17:58 -0500
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Wayne Salamon <xenon@wsalamon.net> - 2021-10-14 09:25 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-10-14 15:29 +0000
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-10-14 14:27 -1000
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2021-10-15 10:07 +0100
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-16 02:53 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2021-10-16 15:34 -0500
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Wayne Salamon <xenon@wsalamon.net> - 2021-10-18 10:55 +0000
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 17:30 -0400
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-10-01 18:27 +0000
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> - 2021-10-01 22:46 +0200
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-01 21:26 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2021-10-02 01:12 -0500
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-02 11:08 +0000
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Mainlander <Mainlander@katamail.com> - 2021-10-02 16:31 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-04 14:19 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-10-05 07:36 +0000
                      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 09:30 +0100
                        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-10-05 10:07 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-05 12:57 +0100
                            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> - 2021-10-05 13:48 +0000
                          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-06 10:08 -0500
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-09-29 16:25 +0100
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:17 -0500
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jason Evans <jsevans@mailfence.com> - 2021-09-29 15:56 +0000
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2021-09-29 17:22 +0100
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:23 -0500
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:22 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-09-30 13:27 +0000
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 12:58 -0500
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-09-30 19:12 +0100
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 13:16 -0700
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 15:59 -0500
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-10-01 17:38 -0700
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-29 17:36 +0000
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 22:32 +0000
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-09-30 08:25 -0500
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-02 10:57 -0500
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-10-02 22:07 +0000
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-02 23:07 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 11:46 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-03 18:14 +0100
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:35 +0000
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-10-03 14:28 -0400
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-10-03 17:31 +0000
    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2021-10-06 15:55 +0300
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2021-10-06 14:35 +0100
      Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 00:37 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-10-07 07:04 +0100
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-07 18:30 +0000
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-10-07 08:47 -0400
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-07 13:07 +0000
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 18:16 -0500
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2021-10-08 00:08 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 20:50 -0500
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-12 09:32 -0500
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 18:38 -0500
        Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2021-10-07 17:42 +0300
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 18:26 -0500
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-07 23:44 +0000
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 20:23 -0500
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-08 01:27 +0000
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-07 20:56 -0500
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-08 01:58 +0000
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-07 20:01 -0700
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-08 00:54 -0500
            Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-10-12 12:23 -0500
              Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-12 13:35 -0500
                Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-12 16:16 -0700
                  Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-10-13 00:17 +0000
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-10-12 20:00 -0700
                    Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2021-10-13 17:48 +0100
          Re: SUSE Reviving Usenet 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> - 2021-10-12 09:38 -0500

Page 7 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 10  Next page →


#219480

FromWayne Salamon <xenon@wsalamon.net>
Date2021-10-18 10:55 +0000
Message-ID<slrnsmqkkd.5qe.xenon@vox.wsalamon.net>
In reply to#219478
On 2021-10-16, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
>
> Ha, it's not just DSL services. It's like everyone!

Yea, but they were stereotypically bad. Every call started with "reboot your
modem" no matter what I said. For months I had a problem where every week day,
starting around 3:30PM, througput would drop about 90%. I suspected it was
due to school being let out and people arriving home and jumping online.

A traceroute showed response times from a gateway four hops away in the seconds.
After "rebooting" the modem, the next question was always "What version of
Windows are you running?" Trying to explain that the DSL gateway was connected
to a switch with many systems on it (none running Windows) didn't get me
anywhere. Trying to explain that I could see the long delays at a downstream
router didn't help either. Several times they insisted on sending a tech to the
house to check things, with the threat that if anything was bad inside the 
house I would be charged. Of course nothing ever was wrong; strong signal and
all that.

When I finally was able to switch and dump DSL, the tech who came out to do the
disconnect told me that they won't turn it back on; no new DSL accounts. That
indicated to me that they would never fix the problems I had.

-- 
WJS

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219170

FromDan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com>
Date2021-09-30 17:30 -0400
Message-ID<sj5a9u$u0k$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#219163
usenet@only.tnx (Questor) writes:

> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 14:44:06 -0000 (UTC), Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:
>>In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>>> It's obscure because most people are mesmerized by social media,
>>> reddit, and the like.
>>
>>It is also obscure because:
>>
>>  1) many (most?) ISP's began dropping NNTP feeds as part of their
>>     provided package of features when one purchased an account.  If
>>     one's ISP did not provide NNTP, and the person signing up did not
>>     already know of Usenet and also know how to buy separate access,
>>     then there was limited to no discovery on the part of new people
>>     on the 'net' of Usenet
>
> As I mentioned in another forum, blame also needs to be placed on
> former New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, who threatened to
> prosecute ISPs over alleged child pornography in binary newsgoups and
> gave the major ISPs an excuse to shut down their NNTP servers entirely
> back in the mid-aughts.

I don't remember it quite that way.  The complaint was "copyrighted
material" which was all over Usenet at the time.

If someone pointed to child pornography I don't remember it.

All the ISPs dropped Usenet like a hot potato.

-- 
Dan Espen

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219194

FromThomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Date2021-10-01 18:27 +0000
Message-ID<sj7jv5$pib$1@newsreader4.netcologne.de>
In reply to#219163
Questor <usenet@only.tnx> schrieb:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 14:44:06 -0000 (UTC), Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:
>>In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>>> It's obscure because most people are mesmerized by social media, reddit,
>>> and the like.
>>
>>It is also obscure because:
>>
>>  1) many (most?) ISP's began dropping NNTP feeds as part of their 
>>     provided package of features when one purchased an account.  If 
>>     one's ISP did not provide NNTP, and the person signing up did not 
>>     already know of Usenet and also know how to buy separate access, 
>>     then there was limited to no discovery on the part of new people 
>>     on the 'net' of Usenet
>
> As I mentioned in another forum, blame also needs to be placed on former New
> York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, who threatened to prosecute ISPs over
> alleged child pornography in binary newsgoups and gave the major ISPs an excuse
> to shut down their NNTP servers entirely back in the mid-aughts.

I thought the correct description was "the naughties"?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219200

FromJakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid>
Date2021-10-01 22:46 +0200
Message-ID<OIWdnUQBw4AP7sr8nZ2dnUU78aXNnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#219194
On 2021-10-01 20:27, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Questor <usenet@only.tnx> schrieb:
>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 14:44:06 -0000 (UTC), Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:
>>> In sci.crypt 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
>>>> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
>>>> It's obscure because most people are mesmerized by social media, reddit,
>>>> and the like.
>>>
>>> It is also obscure because:
>>>
>>>   1) many (most?) ISP's began dropping NNTP feeds as part of their
>>>      provided package of features when one purchased an account.  If
>>>      one's ISP did not provide NNTP, and the person signing up did not
>>>      already know of Usenet and also know how to buy separate access,
>>>      then there was limited to no discovery on the part of new people
>>>      on the 'net' of Usenet
>>
>> As I mentioned in another forum, blame also needs to be placed on former New
>> York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, who threatened to prosecute ISPs over
>> alleged child pornography in binary newsgoups and gave the major ISPs an excuse
>> to shut down their NNTP servers entirely back in the mid-aughts.
> 
> I thought the correct description was "the naughties"?
> 

I was fortunate  in the 1990s to early 2000s to use a dial up ISP that 
had a private NNTP hierarchy as their main support channel (it grew out 
of a local distributor of Modem hardware, and their initial setup was a
huge modem bank from the rack-mounted variant of the modems that I had
purchased directly).  Before that, they had run their own support BBS.

Later they were bought out by incompetent foreign operators and the 
dedicated newsgroups faded away.  Much later they sold all the e-mail 
accounts (which I paid for until the price was dropped to 0) to a local
search portal's e-mail service.  I'm now stuck with a DSL line that 
keeps changing my home IP too often, while our office connections are 
with more expensive providers, that keep at least some semblance of 
stable IP connectivity for our company servers.

Which means company e-mail runs on our own and rented servers, while
personal e-mail is hosted at a dedicated provider that also sells web 
hosting (to those that need it).  For NNTP, I pay for a personal account
with a global usenet host, while home access uses a free provider
that doesn't allow access from work networks.


Enjoy

Jakob
-- 
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S.  https://www.wisemo.com
Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark.  Direct +45 31 13 16 10
This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219203

FromBranimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com>
Date2021-10-01 21:26 +0000
Message-ID<b2L5J.141062$rl3.117711@fx45.iad>
In reply to#219200
On 2021-10-01, Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> wrote:
> hosting (to those that need it).  For NNTP, I pay for a personal account
> with a global usenet host, while home access uses a free provider
> that doesn't allow access from work networks.
>

me as well, usenet server 5$ for lifetime :P
>
> Enjoy
>
> Jakob


-- 

7-77-777
Evil Sinner!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219210

Fromant@zimage.comANT (Ant)
Date2021-10-02 01:12 -0500
Message-ID<aLWdnQ31L9b-Zcr8nZ2dnUU7-VednZ2d@earthlink.com>
In reply to#219203
In alt.folklore.computers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> wrote:
> On 2021-10-01, Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> wrote:
> > hosting (to those that need it).  For NNTP, I pay for a personal account
> > with a global usenet host, while home access uses a free provider
> > that doesn't allow access from work networks.
> >

> me as well, usenet server 5$ for lifetime :P

Which server is that? Do they still offer it and has binaries? ;)

-- 
So many leaks (liquid & digital types), sneezes, itches, pains, videos, issues, software updates, games, etc. Also, BUSY & tired! :(
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
  /\___/\   Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org.
 / /\ /\ \                      Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
| |o   o| |
   \ _ /
    ( )

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219211

FromBranimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com>
Date2021-10-02 11:08 +0000
Message-ID<L4X5J.25398$nh7.16693@fx22.iad>
In reply to#219210
On 2021-10-02, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
> In alt.folklore.computers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> wrote:
>> On 2021-10-01, Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > hosting (to those that need it).  For NNTP, I pay for a personal account
>> > with a global usenet host, while home access uses a free provider
>> > that doesn't allow access from work networks.
>> >
>
>> me as well, usenet server 5$ for lifetime :P
>
> Which server is that? Do they still offer it and has binaries? ;)
>
https://usenet-news.net
10GB lifetime for only 5$.
If you need binaries you pay more, of course :p

-- 

7-77-777
Evil Sinner!
https://github.com/rofl0r/chaos-pp

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219218

FromMainlander <Mainlander@katamail.com>
Date2021-10-02 16:31 +0000
Message-ID<slrnslh2ai.aop.Mainlander@dmaus.org>
In reply to#219210
On 2021-10-02, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
> In alt.folklore.computers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> wrote:
>> On 2021-10-01, Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > hosting (to those that need it).  For NNTP, I pay for a personal account
>> > with a global usenet host, while home access uses a free provider
>> > that doesn't allow access from work networks.
>> >
>
>> me as well, usenet server 5$ for lifetime :P
>
> Which server is that? Do they still offer it and has binaries? ;)
>

binaries are a PITA. No necessary, specially when you are 77+ :)


-- 
greymausg@mail.com
That's not a mousehole!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219275

Fromscott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
Date2021-10-04 14:19 +0000
Message-ID<a4E6J.50420$3p3.48783@fx16.iad>
In reply to#219218
Mainlander <Mainlander@katamail.com> writes:
>On 2021-10-02, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
>> In alt.folklore.computers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> wrote:
>>> On 2021-10-01, Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>> > hosting (to those that need it).  For NNTP, I pay for a personal account
>>> > with a global usenet host, while home access uses a free provider
>>> > that doesn't allow access from work networks.
>>> >
>>
>>> me as well, usenet server 5$ for lifetime :P
>>
>> Which server is that? Do they still offer it and has binaries? ;)
>>
>
>binaries are a PITA. No necessary, specially when you are 77+ :)

At that age, alt.binaries.woodworking is probably more interesting
than alt.binaries.erotica.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219316

FromMaus <Greymaus@mail.com>
Date2021-10-05 07:36 +0000
Message-ID<slrnslo04d.2lp.Greymaus@dmaus.org>
In reply to#219275
On 2021-10-04, Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote:
> Mainlander <Mainlander@katamail.com> writes:
>>On 2021-10-02, Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
>>> In alt.folklore.computers Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2021-10-01, Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>> > hosting (to those that need it).  For NNTP, I pay for a personal account
>>>> > with a global usenet host, while home access uses a free provider
>>>> > that doesn't allow access from work networks.
>>>> >
>>>
>>>> me as well, usenet server 5$ for lifetime :P
>>>
>>> Which server is that? Do they still offer it and has binaries? ;)
>>>
>>
>>binaries are a PITA. No necessary, specially when you are 77+ :)
>
> At that age, alt.binaries.woodworking is probably more interesting
> than alt.binaries.erotica.

At that age, you are on the rolling plains of memory, in which you can remember
things that your children would rather that you forget. I like to recall
potty training them all. The Rolling Stones are supposed to be touring
next year.

-- 
greymausg@mail.com
That's not a mousehole!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219324

FromAhem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Date2021-10-05 09:30 +0100
Message-ID<20211005093042.183da36e0fa56a44830e951a@eircom.net>
In reply to#219316
On 5 Oct 2021 07:36:45 GMT
Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> wrote:

>  The Rolling Stones are supposed to be touring next year.

	It's a good thing my parents didn't live to see Mick Jagger
knighted, the apoplexy would have carried them off.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith
Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219327

FromMaus <Greymaus@mail.com>
Date2021-10-05 10:07 +0000
Message-ID<slrnslo8uc.2m9.Greymaus@dmaus.org>
In reply to#219324
On 2021-10-05, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:
> On 5 Oct 2021 07:36:45 GMT
> Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> wrote:
>
>>  The Rolling Stones are supposed to be touring next year.
>
> 	It's a good thing my parents didn't live to see Mick Jagger
> knighted, the apoplexy would have carried them off.
>

Still, he is fun, and does not preach. When will they accept "Its all
over now"

-- 
greymausg@mail.com
That's not a mousehole!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219331

FromAhem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Date2021-10-05 12:57 +0100
Message-ID<20211005125715.4985f2df977f0e6d2789033c@eircom.net>
In reply to#219327
On 5 Oct 2021 10:07:08 GMT
Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> wrote:

> On 2021-10-05, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:
> > On 5 Oct 2021 07:36:45 GMT
> > Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>  The Rolling Stones are supposed to be touring next year.
> >
> > 	It's a good thing my parents didn't live to see Mick Jagger
> > knighted, the apoplexy would have carried them off.
> >
> 
> Still, he is fun, and does not preach.

	Oh I agree, but to them he was a poster child for all the things
they hated about the 60s ... like fun for example.

> When will they accept "Its all over now"

	Just before the funerals most likely, Charlie Watts didn't miss any
gigs.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith
Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219333

FromMaus <Greymaus@mail.com>
Date2021-10-05 13:48 +0000
Message-ID<slrnsloltp.474.Greymaus@dmaus.org>
In reply to#219331
On 2021-10-05, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:
> On 5 Oct 2021 10:07:08 GMT
> Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2021-10-05, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:
>> > On 5 Oct 2021 07:36:45 GMT
>> > Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>  The Rolling Stones are supposed to be touring next year.
>> >
>> > 	It's a good thing my parents didn't live to see Mick Jagger
>> > knighted, the apoplexy would have carried them off.
>> >
>> 
>> Still, he is fun, and does not preach.
>
> 	Oh I agree, but to them he was a poster child for all the things
> they hated about the 60s ... like fun for example.
>
>> When will they accept "Its all over now"
>
> 	Just before the funerals most likely, Charlie Watts didn't miss any
> gigs.
>

One of them had a farm over towards Naas. If anthing happened to a
machine, mechanic's I knew would would almost fight to go, lovely 19
y.o. Russian girlfriend,, Fun. Amazing how they survived.


-- 
greymausg@mail.com
That's not a mousehole!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219387

FromD.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com>
Date2021-10-06 10:08 -0500
Message-ID<rrerlgt2icile42ckeprsajb89h85llmnu@4ax.com>
In reply to#219327
On 5 Oct 2021 10:07:08 GMT, Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> wrote:
>On 2021-10-05, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:
>> On 5 Oct 2021 07:36:45 GMT
>> Maus <Greymaus@mail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  The Rolling Stones are supposed to be touring next year.
>>
>> 	It's a good thing my parents didn't live to see Mick Jagger
>> knighted, the apoplexy would have carried them off.
>>
>
>Still, he is fun, and does not preach. When will they accept "Its all
>over now"

Grace Slick retired early on. In an interview I saw she said it was
stupid being up on stage singing about teen or 20s angst when she was
close to being 50 years old. So she retired. Apparently she didn't
think much of The Rolling Stones still going on tour either.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219115

FromAhem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net>
Date2021-09-29 16:25 +0100
Message-ID<20210929162552.4d50e625606f2cfa30c3f5f1@eircom.net>
In reply to#219113
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:04:16 -0500
711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:

> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead.

	There is a branch of USENET that's alive and kicking that funds a
number of commercial NNTP servers with enormous retention times (multiple
years), a large catalogue of binary groups and some very odd posting
arrangements. But that's not really USENET it's file sharing by NNTP.

	I keep getting tempted to run up a text only server here but
managing misbehaving users is a PITA.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith
Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219143

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-09-30 08:17 -0500
Message-ID<sj4dcv$1qgf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#219115
On 9/29/21 10:25 AM, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:04:16 -0500
> 711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart> wrote:
> 
>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead.
> 
> 	There is a branch of USENET that's alive and kicking that funds a
> number of commercial NNTP servers with enormous retention times (multiple
> years), a large catalogue of binary groups and some very odd posting
> arrangements. But that's not really USENET it's file sharing by NNTP.
> 
> 	I keep getting tempted to run up a text only server here but
> managing misbehaving users is a PITA.
> 

Indeed. That's why I am hesitating to set up a open NNTP
server--managing the rabble is a tedious job. I really want to set one
up, but I really do not want to commit to all the daily janitorial work.

If we had Usenet hierarchies that could require proof of work from
clients, sort of like Bitmessage does, or imposed post limits based on
signing keys that require a long time to generate one signing key, that
could mitigate a lot of the spam and trolling.

But then we get into the need for re-factoring client software and all
the associated boondoggle.

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219117

FromJason Evans <jsevans@mailfence.com>
Date2021-09-29 15:56 +0000
Message-ID<sj22bi$28p$1@theuse.news.theuse.net>
In reply to#219113
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:04:16 -0500, 711 Spooky Mart wrote:

> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using Usenet.
> I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered it dead.
> It's obscure because most people are mesmerized by social media, reddit,
> and the like. Let the proles and zombies have their addictive behavior
> modeling distractions. As for me and my net, we will serve the ASCII.

I'm glad you liked my presentation. I've been trying to get more people 
to use it. I've written a couple of "for newbs" tutorials and I've gotten 
some good feedback. 

I'm hoping to do some more projects in the future to shed light on Usenet 
as something more than just a file-sharing platform.

__
JE

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219118

From"Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1>
Date2021-09-29 17:22 +0100
Message-ID<20210929172256.dcbf2a9c2dbbdb7febae1608@127.0.0.1>
In reply to#219117
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:56:34 -0000 (UTC)
Jason Evans <jsevans@mailfence.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:04:16 -0500, 711 Spooky Mart wrote:
> 
> > I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using
> > Usenet. I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered

That's not really "using": or maybe it is - like drug-user; purely consuming.

> > it dead. It's obscure because most people are mesmerized by social
> > media, reddit, and the like. Let the proles and zombies have their
> > addictive behavior modeling distractions. As for me and my net, we
> > will serve the ASCII.
> 
> I'm glad you liked my presentation. I've been trying to get more
> people to use it. I've written a couple of "for newbs" tutorials and
> I've gotten some good feedback. 
> 
> I'm hoping to do some more projects in the future to shed light on
> Usenet as something more than just a file-sharing platform.
> 
> __
> JE


-- 
Bah, and indeed Humbug.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#219145

From711 Spooky Mart <711@spooky.mart>
Date2021-09-30 08:23 -0500
Message-ID<sj4doi$1v5d$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#219118
On 9/29/21 11:22 AM, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:56:34 -0000 (UTC)
> Jason Evans <jsevans@mailfence.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:04:16 -0500, 711 Spooky Mart wrote:
>>
>>> I've heard many times that Usenet is dead. I never stopped using
>>> Usenet. I've been lurking Usenet for decades and I never considered
> 
> That's not really "using": or maybe it is - like drug-user; purely consuming.

Semantics, shmantix.

-- 
███████████████████████████████████
█░░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░███
█░░███████░░█░░████░░███░░████░░███        [chan] 711
█░░░░░░░██░░█░░░░██░░███░░░░██░░███        spooky mart
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        always open
██████░░██░░███░░██░░█████░░██░░███        stay spooky
██████░░██░░█░░░░██░░░░█░░░░██░░░░█        https://bitmessage.org
██████░░██░░█░░██████░░█░░██████░░█
██████░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░█
███████████████████████████████████

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 7 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 10  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers


csiph-web