Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #216290 > unrolled thread
| Started by | gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-01-13 20:21 +0000 |
| Last post | 2021-02-24 05:32 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 369 — 50 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.folklore.computers
Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-13 20:21 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) "A.T. Murray" <mentificium@gmail.com> - 2021-01-13 12:39 -0800
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-13 20:59 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) bert <bert.hutchings@btinternet.com> - 2021-01-13 13:16 -0800
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-13 22:18 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-14 11:45 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2021-01-14 10:06 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-14 17:16 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> - 2021-01-14 15:04 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-14 10:16 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-01-14 14:56 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-14 15:42 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-14 17:12 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-14 18:43 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-14 19:50 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-01-14 21:38 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 18:54 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-15 00:11 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-15 01:00 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 23:32 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-15 21:56 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-14 16:00 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-14 14:07 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-14 21:20 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-14 18:01 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-14 23:41 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-15 02:21 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-17 11:00 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-17 11:59 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-17 17:44 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-17 19:10 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-18 11:42 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Elliott Roper <nospam@yrl.co.uk> - 2021-01-18 12:29 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 10:23 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-18 12:12 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andy Leighton <andyl@azaal.plus.com> - 2021-01-18 09:17 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-19 10:07 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-19 10:14 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) "Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@127.0.0.1> - 2021-01-19 10:21 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-19 11:17 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andy Leighton <andyl@azaal.plus.com> - 2021-01-19 12:13 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-19 21:39 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-19 18:08 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andy Leighton <andyl@azaal.plus.com> - 2021-01-20 04:22 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-21 07:44 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-22 17:49 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-23 15:24 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-23 20:24 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2021-01-24 12:49 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-24 13:13 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-24 22:30 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-25 07:00 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-25 21:56 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-26 08:28 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-01-26 09:35 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-26 12:06 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-26 21:51 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-26 04:41 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-26 12:06 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-26 22:03 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-27 07:03 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-27 09:50 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-27 18:21 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-28 00:34 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-01-28 12:29 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-29 17:53 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andy Walker <anw@cuboid.co.uk> - 2021-01-27 19:46 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-27 20:41 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) mjb@signal11.invalid (Mike) - 2021-01-27 13:00 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-28 00:39 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) "Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@127.0.0.1> - 2021-01-28 17:39 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-29 17:51 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) "Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@127.0.0.1> - 2021-01-30 09:56 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-25 15:46 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-01-25 17:52 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-01-25 18:30 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-01-25 18:37 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-25 19:33 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-26 01:37 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2021-01-28 00:13 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-27 20:58 -0500
Re: just in case, Too much for one lifetime? :-) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-01-28 18:57 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 14:20 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-29 11:14 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2021-01-30 16:59 +0100
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-30 17:22 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-30 15:46 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-30 18:09 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-25 19:31 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-25 22:19 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-26 16:27 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-26 22:22 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-27 00:55 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-27 20:34 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-26 22:48 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-25 19:42 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2021-01-25 15:45 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-25 19:20 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Joacim Melin <Joacim.Melin@f1.n221.z2.fidonet.fi> - 2021-01-25 20:33 +0200
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-25 22:12 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-01-26 03:47 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-26 16:42 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-26 22:11 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-27 08:36 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-27 00:55 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-01-27 10:52 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 13:13 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2021-01-29 23:19 +0200
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-26 12:06 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-26 21:13 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-26 22:19 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-27 00:55 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2021-01-30 16:48 +0100
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-30 17:26 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-30 20:06 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-01-30 14:38 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-30 15:46 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 13:13 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-26 18:47 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-27 00:55 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-01-27 10:50 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-01-27 12:14 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-27 15:55 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-01-27 20:13 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2021-01-28 09:48 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-26 18:44 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-27 00:55 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-27 01:33 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2021-01-27 13:05 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-27 12:29 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2021-01-28 09:17 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 14:20 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-27 18:21 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-27 18:42 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-27 22:21 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2021-01-30 16:40 +0100
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-30 16:04 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-31 16:06 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-31 21:35 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-01 14:15 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-02-01 16:54 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-02-01 09:54 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-01 18:12 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-02-02 04:26 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-25 16:02 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-01-26 01:47 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-26 08:23 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) "Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@127.0.0.1> - 2021-01-26 09:42 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-26 10:16 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-26 12:06 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-26 19:21 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-26 11:01 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-26 18:31 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-26 19:23 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-25 22:35 -0500
Learning European languages Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2021-01-26 04:15 +0000
Re: Learning European languages J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-25 23:32 -0500
Re: Learning European languages Gerard Schildberger <gerard46@rrt.net> - 2021-01-26 04:58 -0800
Re: Learning European languages Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-26 13:18 +0000
Re: Learning European languages Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-26 12:06 -0700
Re: Learning European languages Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-01-27 17:55 +0000
Re: Learning European languages Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-26 05:12 -0500
Re: Learning European languages Stefan Möding <Jan2021.5.kill-9@spamgourmet.com> - 2021-01-26 11:59 +0100
Re: Learning European languages Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2021-01-26 13:58 +0000
Re: Learning European languages Stefan Möding <Jan2021.5.kill-9@spamgourmet.com> - 2021-01-26 15:10 +0100
Re: Learning European languages Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-26 19:07 -0400
Re: Learning European languages Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-26 22:59 -0500
Re: Learning European languages Stefan Möding <Jan2021.5.kill-9@spamgourmet.com> - 2021-01-27 07:44 +0100
Re: Learning European languages Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-28 00:54 -0500
Re: Learning European languages Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2021-01-28 09:20 +0000
Re: Learning European languages Stefan Möding <Jan2021.5.kill-9@spamgourmet.com> - 2021-01-28 11:06 +0100
Re: Learning European languages J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-28 08:42 -0500
Re: Learning European languages gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 15:26 +0000
Re: Learning European languages Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-28 18:47 +0000
Re: Learning European languages lawrence <lawrence@cluon.com> - 2021-01-28 12:54 -0600
Re: Learning European languages gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 20:06 +0000
Re: Learning European languages gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 20:04 +0000
Re: Learning European languages Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-29 17:45 -0500
Re: Learning European languages Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> - 2021-02-20 18:22 +0100
Re: Learning European languages Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-20 13:12 -0500
Re: Learning European languages Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> - 2021-02-21 15:36 +0100
Re: Learning European languages Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-21 17:49 -0500
Re: Learning European languages Fred Smith <fred@thejanitor.corp> - 2021-01-29 01:47 +0000
Re: Learning European languages Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2021-01-31 18:09 +0200
Re: Learning European languages Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-28 10:27 +0000
Re: Learning European languages gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 11:31 +0000
Re: Learning European languages Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-29 17:50 -0500
Re: Learning European languages Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2021-01-26 13:56 +0000
Re: Learning European languages Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-26 12:06 -0700
Re: Learning European languages Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2021-01-26 22:23 +0000
Re: Learning European languages Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-26 23:15 -0500
Re: Learning European languages Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-27 00:06 -0500
Re: Learning European languages JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-01-27 10:58 -0600
Re: Learning European languages Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-01-27 12:17 -0500
Re: Learning European languages Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-27 18:21 +0000
Re: Learning European languages Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 13:13 -0700
Re: Learning European languages Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-28 16:03 -0500
Re: Learning European languages Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-28 23:00 +0000
Email is collective (Was: Learning European languages) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-28 23:06 -0400
Re: Email is collective (Was: Learning European languages) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-29 17:08 +0000
Re: Email is collective (Was: Learning European languages) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-29 16:34 -0400
Re: Email is collective (Was: Learning European languages) Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-29 19:58 -0500
Re: Email is collective (Was: Learning European languages) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-30 15:46 -0700
Re: Learning European languages J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-28 23:30 -0500
Re: Learning European languages J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-28 16:24 -0500
Re: Learning European languages Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-28 23:00 +0000
Re: Learning European languages "Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@127.0.0.1> - 2021-01-28 22:12 +0000
Re: Learning European languages Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-28 22:44 -0400
Re: Learning European languages Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-29 20:01 -0500
Re: Learning European languages Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2021-01-31 19:48 +0000
Re: Learning European languages Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 13:13 -0700
Re: Learning European languages Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2021-01-31 20:02 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-01-26 12:03 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-26 18:34 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) jolomo@gmail.com (Joe Morris) - 2021-01-26 19:17 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-01-26 13:46 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-26 19:26 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2021-01-27 11:35 +0000
Obligatory thread drift (was Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-)) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-27 18:21 +0000
Re: Obligatory thread drift (was Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-)) Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-27 20:46 -0500
Re: Obligatory thread drift (was Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-)) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2021-01-28 09:10 +0000
Re: Obligatory thread drift (was Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-)) drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2021-01-28 10:04 -0600
Re: Obligatory thread drift (was Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-)) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-28 18:47 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 13:13 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-28 16:16 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-26 18:25 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-01-27 06:46 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-01-27 17:49 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-27 18:41 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-01-27 10:47 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2021-01-28 09:12 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-01-28 12:30 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 13:13 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-28 15:52 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-26 21:57 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-26 12:06 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-01-26 13:43 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-26 20:49 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-26 18:31 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Elliott Roper <nospam@yrl.co.uk> - 2021-01-27 00:10 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-26 19:34 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-26 22:01 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-01-27 04:21 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-28 00:31 -0500
Re: linguistic miracles, Too much for one lifetime? :-) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-01-28 19:13 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 13:13 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2021-01-26 14:05 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> - 2021-01-26 16:34 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 13:13 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-29 17:57 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Rich Alderson <news@alderson.users.panix.com> - 2021-01-29 19:55 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-30 04:58 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-26 21:56 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2021-01-27 11:32 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-01-27 12:24 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-27 13:11 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 13:13 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andy Leighton <andyl@azaal.plus.com> - 2021-01-29 04:05 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-29 16:45 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-01-27 10:55 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-27 18:21 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-01-27 19:45 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-27 16:00 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2021-01-28 00:13 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-27 19:00 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-28 00:43 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2021-01-28 10:10 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Niklas Karlsson <anksil@yahoo.se> - 2021-01-28 16:19 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-28 14:37 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-28 20:31 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-28 14:20 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) "Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@127.0.0.1> - 2021-01-28 22:15 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-29 11:16 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-29 12:18 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-29 17:08 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone) - 2021-01-29 10:21 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-01-29 17:04 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-29 17:15 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-29 17:14 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-29 11:58 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-01-29 14:38 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-29 21:02 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2021-01-30 14:09 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-01-31 00:09 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2021-01-30 20:27 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-31 05:35 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-01-31 01:37 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-26 12:06 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) "Kerr-Mudd,John" <notsaying@127.0.0.1> - 2021-01-26 21:18 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-01-26 21:57 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-01-26 22:38 -0500
Re: life in Switzerland, Too much for one lifetime? :-) John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2021-01-27 04:27 +0000
Re: life in Switzerland, Too much for one lifetime? :-) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-01-27 06:42 +0000
Re: life in Switzerland, Too much for one lifetime? :-) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-01-27 18:45 +0000
Re: life in Switzerland, Too much for one lifetime? :-) Juergen Nieveler <juergen.nieveler.nospam@arcor.de> - 2021-02-01 15:00 +0100
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2021-01-30 09:39 +0100
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2021-02-26 14:22 -0800
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2021-02-26 22:40 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-02-26 23:28 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Niklas Karlsson <nikke.karlsson@gmail.com> - 2021-02-27 10:43 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-27 10:22 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-02-28 20:59 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-28 22:50 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-26 08:09 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> - 2021-02-02 02:02 +0100
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andy Leighton <andyl@azaal.plus.com> - 2021-02-02 04:38 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-02-02 11:20 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-18 17:16 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-19 10:04 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-01-19 17:58 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) maus <maus@dmaus.org> - 2021-01-17 22:47 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-13 22:12 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Daniel <me@sci.fidan.com> - 2021-02-23 22:04 -0800
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-24 09:27 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-02-24 17:33 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-24 19:23 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-25 18:28 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-26 00:05 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-02-24 12:51 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-02-24 17:23 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-02-24 15:45 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-02-25 05:03 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-02-25 09:59 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-02-25 16:52 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2021-02-25 19:38 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-02-25 19:44 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-25 21:46 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-02-26 05:19 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-26 12:59 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-26 20:53 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-27 10:51 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-02-27 11:19 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-02-27 10:17 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-25 18:28 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-02-26 13:52 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2021-02-26 10:53 -1000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-25 18:29 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-26 12:56 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charles Richmond <codescott@aquaporin4.com> - 2021-09-29 12:27 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-29 17:34 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-09-29 13:32 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-09-30 01:50 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-09-30 10:10 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-09-29 19:54 +0100
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-09-30 01:48 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-09-30 12:51 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> - 2021-10-01 22:03 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> - 2021-10-02 13:33 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2021-10-02 19:56 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) "robertth...@googlemail.com" <robertthebilling@googlemail.com> - 2021-01-31 05:32 -0800
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-31 15:58 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) PeterP <petep@palindrome.invalid> - 2021-01-31 21:27 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-01-31 22:11 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) PeterP <petep@palindrome.invalid> - 2021-01-31 22:50 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-01 14:08 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) PeterP <petep@palindrome.invalid> - 2021-02-01 17:49 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-01 18:41 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) PeterP <petep@palindrome.invalid> - 2021-02-01 19:01 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2021-01-31 19:32 -0400
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-02-01 09:24 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2021-02-01 11:45 -0700
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-02-01 21:34 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-01 18:19 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2021-02-02 04:26 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) J. Clarke <jclarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2021-02-02 01:13 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2021-02-02 06:50 +0000
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Charles Richmond <codescott@aquaporin4.com> - 2021-09-29 12:12 -0500
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> - 2021-02-02 09:21 -0600
Re: Too much for one lifetime? :-) Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> - 2021-02-24 05:32 -0800
Page 18 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 16 17 [18] 19 Next page →
| From | D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-29 13:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <77c9lg1bs6frv9if1j4dpt78geeeseuotn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #219124 |
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:34:54 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote: >Charles Richmond <codescott@aquaporin4.com> writes: >>On 2/24/2021 12:51 PM, JimP wrote: > >>> >> >>There was (is) a stand-up comedian who does routines about the way >>things used to be: >> >>"When I was a teenager, we did *not* have caller id... you just >>answered the phone and took your chances!!!" > >Although if you go back far enough, the operator would have >rung your line and announced the caller. One of my nephews, when he was 20 years old, asked me what kind of cell phone I had when I was a kid ? After my sister and I stopped laughing, around 5 minutes later, we pointed out that such devices are new.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-30 01:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <sj3j68$o98$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #219127 |
On 9/29/2021 2:32 PM, D.J. wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:34:54 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) > wrote: >> Charles Richmond<codescott@aquaporin4.com> writes: >>> On 2/24/2021 12:51 PM, JimP wrote: >> >>>> >>> >>> There was (is) a stand-up comedian who does routines about the way >>> things used to be: >>> >>> "When I was a teenager, we did *not* have caller id... you just >>> answered the phone and took your chances!!!" >> >> Although if you go back far enough, the operator would have >> rung your line and announced the caller. > > One of my nephews, when he was 20 years old, asked me what kind of > cell phone I had when I was a kid ? > > After my sister and I stopped laughing, around 5 minutes later, we > pointed out that such devices are new. Really? How old is he now? Some kids must have been sheltered. I'm 26, and I recall when my parents first got cell phones, at least 18 years ago. I eventually got one as well, but growing up, I always used the home phone (and still prefer my home phone).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D.J. <chucktheouch@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-30 10:10 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kqkblgdillege35jou0vqf74gehbkj12de@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #219139 |
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:50:04 -0400, Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> wrote: >On 9/29/2021 2:32 PM, D.J. wrote: >> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:34:54 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) >> wrote: >>> Charles Richmond<codescott@aquaporin4.com> writes: >>>> On 2/24/2021 12:51 PM, JimP wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> There was (is) a stand-up comedian who does routines about the way >>>> things used to be: >>>> >>>> "When I was a teenager, we did *not* have caller id... you just >>>> answered the phone and took your chances!!!" >>> >>> Although if you go back far enough, the operator would have >>> rung your line and announced the caller. >> >> One of my nephews, when he was 20 years old, asked me what kind of >> cell phone I had when I was a kid ? >> >> After my sister and I stopped laughing, around 5 minutes later, we >> pointed out that such devices are new. > >Really? How old is he now? Some kids must have been sheltered. > >I'm 26, and I recall when my parents first got cell phones, at least 18 >years ago. I eventually got one as well, but growing up, I always used >the home phone (and still prefer my home phone). Still in his early 20s.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-29 19:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20210929195447.6db85768fb30ad32530608d2@eircom.net> |
| In reply to | #219124 |
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:34:54 GMT scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote: > Although if you go back far enough, the operator would have > rung your line and announced the caller. Then listened in for a bit to see if there was any juicy gossip^W^W^W^W^Wyou needed any more assistance. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-30 01:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <sj3j2i$o98$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #219123 |
On 9/29/2021 1:27 PM, Charles Richmond wrote:
>
> There was (is) a stand-up comedian who does routines about the way
> things used to be:
>
> "When I was a teenager, we did *not* have caller id... you just answered
> the phone and took your chances!!!"
>
> "We did *not* have message machines or voice mail... if you were *not*
> home and someone called... you just *missed* it!"
>
> "In the past, we had *no* GPS or navigation units. If you were going on
> a trip, you stopped at a gas station ("service station") and got a big,
> confusing folded paper thing called a "road map"!
I'm still stuck in the land line caller ID loop.. I prefer my POTS line,
but I won't pay AT&T $13/mo (before tax) for caller ID. I answer and
"take my chance".. lol! The digital answering machine is nice, however.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-30 12:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <87o88a0zxe.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> |
| In reply to | #219123 |
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 12:27:35 -0500, Charles Richmond wrote:
>
> There was (is) a stand-up comedian who does routines about the way
> things used to be:
>
> "When I was a teenager, we did *not* have caller id... you just
> answered the phone and took your chances!!!"
>
> "We did *not* have message machines or voice mail... if you were *not*
> home and someone called... you just *missed* it!"
>
> "In the past, we had *no* GPS or navigation units. If you were going
> on a trip, you stopped at a gas station ("service station") and got a
> big, confusing folded paper thing called a "road map"!
If you'd take away electronics today (may be by an EMP, solar flare) most
people today would be helpless. Cars after the mid 1980s wouldn't even
work, let alone GPS. Some older cars still on the roads today not
affected might have manual gear shift most (Americans) couldn't operate.
--
Andreas
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-01 22:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <sj8ekl$e6r$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #219158 |
On 9/30/2021 12:51 PM, Andreas Kohlbach wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 12:27:35 -0500, Charles Richmond wrote:
>>
>> There was (is) a stand-up comedian who does routines about the way
>> things used to be:
>>
>> "When I was a teenager, we did *not* have caller id... you just
>> answered the phone and took your chances!!!"
>>
>> "We did *not* have message machines or voice mail... if you were *not*
>> home and someone called... you just *missed* it!"
>>
>> "In the past, we had *no* GPS or navigation units. If you were going
>> on a trip, you stopped at a gas station ("service station") and got a
>> big, confusing folded paper thing called a "road map"!
>
> If you'd take away electronics today (may be by an EMP, solar flare) most
> people today would be helpless. Cars after the mid 1980s wouldn't even
> work, let alone GPS. Some older cars still on the roads today not
> affected might have manual gear shift most (Americans) couldn't operate.
I'm somewhat ready for the EMP. ;) I'm not so sure even early 80's
cars would work.. my '75 Dart has very primitive electronic ignition -
no points, so that might be out for the count also. I do have a '68
Ford Galaxie that would be set to go.
Many people today don't have or like standard shift cars. Yes, they are
about dead in the US, but many car folks prefer them. Several of my
younger siblings in their 20's own and drive standard shift cars. I've
burned through 30 some cars in the last several years (I buy/sell them),
and most are standard.. I dislike automatics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-02 13:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <877devxrff.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> |
| In reply to | #219206 |
On Fri, 01 Oct 2021 22:03:05 -0400, Michael Trew wrote: > > On 9/30/2021 12:51 PM, Andreas Kohlbach wrote: > >> If you'd take away electronics today (may be by an EMP, solar flare) most >> people today would be helpless. Cars after the mid 1980s wouldn't even >> work, let alone GPS. Some older cars still on the roads today not >> affected might have manual gear shift most (Americans) couldn't operate. > > I'm somewhat ready for the EMP. ;) I'm not so sure even early 80's > cars would work.. my '75 Dart has very primitive electronic ignition - > no points, so that might be out for the count also. I do have a '68 > Ford Galaxie that would be set to go. > > Many people today don't have or like standard shift cars. Yes, they > are about dead in the US, but many car folks prefer them. Several of > my younger siblings in their 20's own and drive standard shift cars. > I've burned through 30 some cars in the last several years (I buy/sell > them), and most are standard.. I dislike automatics. I only drove in automatic in my life. Friend let me ride his Hyundai SUV some years ago. ALL automatic (not just gear shifting), how boring! -- Andreas
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-02 19:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <irrrruFfru2U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #219225 |
On Sat, 02 Oct 2021 13:33:24 -0400, Andreas Kohlbach wrote: > I only drove in automatic in my life. Friend let me ride his Hyundai SUV > some years ago. ALL automatic (not just gear shifting), how boring! I drove a full hybrid with CVT yesterday. No clues from any gear shifts at all, and engine note (when present) no clue as to speed! -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "robertth...@googlemail.com" <robertthebilling@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-31 05:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ad651480-f5bf-463c-bbc3-03b801764c5an@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #216290 |
On Wednesday, 13 January 2021 at 20:22:06 UTC, gareth evans wrote: > This year is 50 years since I first cut my teeth on > assembler programming on a 16kb PDP11-20, but I can I started my first paid programming job on a PDP11/40 in 1973. > Are there any other technologies that have had comparable > periods of accelerated development? Steam locomotives came on a long way between about 1830-1880, and of course there has been one fantastically rapid development in my lifetime, "We choose to go to the moon." Radar ans code breaking during WW2 also did very well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-31 15:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rv6k36$akh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #216750 |
On 31/01/2021 13:32, robertth...@googlemail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, 13 January 2021 at 20:22:06 UTC, gareth evans wrote: >> This year is 50 years since I first cut my teeth on >> assembler programming on a 16kb PDP11-20, but I can > > I started my first paid programming job on a PDP11/40 in 1973. > >> Are there any other technologies that have had comparable >> periods of accelerated development? > > Steam locomotives came on a long way between about 1830-1880, and of course there has been one fantastically rapid development in my lifetime, "We choose to go to the moon." Radar ans code breaking during WW2 also did very well. > The cost of that PDP11-20 was about 10 times my graduate starting salary, but the new Pico from the Raspberry Pi stable exceeds its computing power and memory storage and only costs a few tuppences!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | PeterP <petep@palindrome.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-31 21:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rv77cn$r0b$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #216752 |
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 15:58:28 +0000 gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 31/01/2021 13:32, robertth...@googlemail.com wrote: > > On Wednesday, 13 January 2021 at 20:22:06 UTC, gareth evans wrote: > >> This year is 50 years since I first cut my teeth on > >> assembler programming on a 16kb PDP11-20, but I can > > > > I started my first paid programming job on a PDP11/40 in 1973. > > > >> Are there any other technologies that have had comparable > >> periods of accelerated development? > > > > Steam locomotives came on a long way between about 1830-1880, and > > of course there has been one fantastically rapid development in my > > lifetime, "We choose to go to the moon." Radar ans code breaking > > during WW2 also did very well. > > The cost of that PDP11-20 was about 10 times my > graduate starting salary, but the new Pico from > the Raspberry Pi stable exceeds its computing power > and memory storage and only costs a few tuppences! > FFS sake give it a rest, you tedious repetitive troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-31 22:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rv79ud$a9v$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #216762 |
On 31/01/2021 21:27, PeterP wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 15:58:28 +0000 > gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On 31/01/2021 13:32, robertth...@googlemail.com wrote: >>> On Wednesday, 13 January 2021 at 20:22:06 UTC, gareth evans wrote: >>>> This year is 50 years since I first cut my teeth on >>>> assembler programming on a 16kb PDP11-20, but I can >>> >>> I started my first paid programming job on a PDP11/40 in 1973. >>> >>>> Are there any other technologies that have had comparable >>>> periods of accelerated development? >>> >>> Steam locomotives came on a long way between about 1830-1880, and >>> of course there has been one fantastically rapid development in my >>> lifetime, "We choose to go to the moon." Radar ans code breaking >>> during WW2 also did very well. >> >> The cost of that PDP11-20 was about 10 times my >> graduate starting salary, but the new Pico from >> the Raspberry Pi stable exceeds its computing power >> and memory storage and only costs a few tuppences! >> > > FFS sake give it a rest, you tedious repetitive troll. > I don't know who you are, but your interjection is childish when you have the option to KF me should you consider me to be a troll. Grow up, Sonny!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | PeterP <petep@palindrome.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-31 22:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rv7c8g$r0b$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #216763 |
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:11:25 +0000 gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> / Gareth's Downstairs Computer <headstone255.but.not.these.five.words@yahoo.com>/ gareth <no.spam@thank.you.invalid>/ gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 <no.spam@thank.you.invalid>/ Areligious Republican <headstone255@yahoo.com>/ Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer <headstone255@yahoo.com>. wrote: > On 31/01/2021 21:27, PeterP wrote: > > FFS sake give it a rest, you tedious repetitive troll. > > > > I don't know who you are, but your interjection is childish when > you have the option to KF me should you consider me to be a troll. Yes, of course. > Grow up, Sonny! > You first, cloudy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-02-01 14:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rv921n$j2g$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #216764 |
On 31/01/2021 22:50, PeterP wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:11:25 +0000 > gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> / > Gareth's Downstairs Computer > <headstone255.but.not.these.five.words@yahoo.com>/ > gareth <no.spam@thank.you.invalid>/ > gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 <no.spam@thank.you.invalid>/ > Areligious Republican <headstone255@yahoo.com>/ > Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer <headstone255@yahoo.com>. > wrote: > >> On 31/01/2021 21:27, PeterP wrote: > >>> FFS sake give it a rest, you tedious repetitive troll. >>> >> >> I don't know who you are, but your interjection is childish when >> you have the option to KF me should you consider me to be a troll. > > Yes, of course. > >> Grow up, Sonny! >> > > You first, cloudy. > > You now present as an obsessive stalker and thus a candidate for the loony bin. Grow up, Sonny!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | PeterP <petep@palindrome.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-02-01 17:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rv9eut$mu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #216774 |
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:08:54 +0000 gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 31/01/2021 22:50, PeterP wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:11:25 +0000 > > gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> / > > Gareth's Downstairs Computer > > <headstone255.but.not.these.five.words@yahoo.com>/ > > gareth <no.spam@thank.you.invalid>/ > > gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 <no.spam@thank.you.invalid>/ > > Areligious Republican <headstone255@yahoo.com>/ > > Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer > > <headstone255@yahoo.com>. wrote: > > > >> On 31/01/2021 21:27, PeterP wrote: > > > >>> FFS sake give it a rest, you tedious repetitive troll. > >>> > >> > >> I don't know who you are, but your interjection is childish when > >> you have the option to KF me should you consider me to be a > >> troll. > > > > Yes, of course. > > > >> Grow up, Sonny! > >> > > > > You first, cloudy. > > > > > > You now present as an obsessive stalker and thus a candidate > for the loony bin. Deflecting. nym-shifting troll. > Grow up, Sonny! > You first, Foggy!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-02-01 18:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rv9i17$oj2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #216779 |
On 01/02/2021 17:49, PeterP wrote: > On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:08:54 +0000 > gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> wrote: >> On 31/01/2021 22:50, PeterP wrote: >>> On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:11:25 +0000 >>> gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> / >>> Gareth's Downstairs Computer >>> <headstone255.but.not.these.five.words@yahoo.com>/ >>> gareth <no.spam@thank.you.invalid>/ >>> gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 <no.spam@thank.you.invalid>/ >>> Areligious Republican <headstone255@yahoo.com>/ >>> Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer >>> <headstone255@yahoo.com>. wrote: >>>> On 31/01/2021 21:27, PeterP wrote: >>>>> FFS sake give it a rest, you tedious repetitive troll. >>>> I don't know who you are, but your interjection is childish when >>>> you have the option to KF me should you consider me to be a >>>> troll. >>> Yes, of course. >>>> Grow up, Sonny! >>> You first, cloudy. >> You now present as an obsessive stalker and thus a candidate >> for the loony bin. > Deflecting. nym-shifting troll. >> Grow up, Sonny! > You first, Foggy! You've appeared out-of-the-blue with no history of posting to this NG and intent on a personal attack on me, to the extent that one questions your presence at all. Whether or not you think me to be a troll, it is you who has hit a KF - mine. <PLONK!>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | PeterP <petep@palindrome.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-02-01 19:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rv9j63$mu$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #216780 |
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 18:41:39 +0000 gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 01/02/2021 17:49, PeterP wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:08:54 +0000 > > gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On 31/01/2021 22:50, PeterP wrote: > >>> On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 22:11:25 +0000 > >>> gareth evans <headstone255@yahoo.com> / > >>> Gareth's Downstairs Computer > >>> <headstone255.but.not.these.five.words@yahoo.com>/ > >>> gareth <no.spam@thank.you.invalid>/ > >>> gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 <no.spam@thank.you.invalid>/ > >>> Areligious Republican <headstone255@yahoo.com>/ > >>> Gareth's was W7 now W10 Downstairs Computer > >>> <headstone255@yahoo.com>. wrote: > >>>> On 31/01/2021 21:27, PeterP wrote: > >>>>> FFS sake give it a rest, you tedious repetitive troll. > >>>> I don't know who you are, but your interjection is childish when > >>>> you have the option to KF me should you consider me to be a > >>>> troll. > >>> Yes, of course. > >>>> Grow up, Sonny! > >>> You first, cloudy. > >> You now present as an obsessive stalker and thus a candidate > >> for the loony bin. > > Deflecting. nym-shifting troll. > >> Grow up, Sonny! > > You first, Foggy! > > You've appeared out-of-the-blue with no history of posting > to this NG and intent on a personal attack on me, to the > extent that one questions your presence at all. > > Whether or not you think me to be a troll, it is you who > has hit a KF - mine. > > <PLONK!> > Deflecting nym-shifting troll.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-31 19:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <87zh0ok7h3.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> |
| In reply to | #216750 |
"robertth...@googlemail.com" <robertthebilling@googlemail.com> writes: > On Wednesday, 13 January 2021 at 20:22:06 UTC, gareth evans wrote: > >> Are there any other technologies that have had comparable >> periods of accelerated development? The first guns -- 2 of them -- were imported to Japan in the 1540s. A couple of decades later, gunsmithing was a major industry with thousands being produced. At the battle of Nagashino in 1575, hundreds of arquebusiers under Oda Nobunaga and Tokugawa Hideyoshi pretty much ended classical Japanese warfare by wiping out the whole Takeda army. (There's a great Kurosawa movie about it: Kagemusha.) AFAIK, there was little of no improvement or innovation in gun design but by Nagashino there were far more guns deployed in Japan than in Elizabeth's England so the craft/industry ramped up at phenomenal speed. -- Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JimP <chucktheouch@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-02-01 09:24 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <477g1gdem1soiqldrrdhkseukabu1ulq4n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #216767 |
On 31 Jan 2021 19:32:56 -0400, Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote: > >"robertth...@googlemail.com" <robertthebilling@googlemail.com> writes: > >> On Wednesday, 13 January 2021 at 20:22:06 UTC, gareth evans wrote: >> >>> Are there any other technologies that have had comparable >>> periods of accelerated development? > >The first guns -- 2 of them -- were imported to Japan in the 1540s. A >couple of decades later, gunsmithing was a major industry with >thousands being produced. At the battle of Nagashino in 1575, >hundreds of arquebusiers under Oda Nobunaga and Tokugawa Hideyoshi >pretty much ended classical Japanese warfare by wiping out the whole >Takeda army. (There's a great Kurosawa movie about it: Kagemusha.) > >AFAIK, there was little of no improvement or innovation in gun design >but by Nagashino there were far more guns deployed in Japan than in >Elizabeth's England so the craft/industry ramped up at phenomenal >speed. There is a movie excerpt on youtube that shows this battle/action. All in Japanese, I don't remember any sub-titles. But it is obvious what is going on. Commands, then you see the arquibusers loading, command, then they aim, etc. -- Jim
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 18 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 16 17 [18] 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.folklore.computers
csiph-web