Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #165125
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> |
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Raspberry Pi 3? |
| Date | Tue, 14 Jun 2016 13:07:13 -0700 |
| Organization | Wheeler&Wheeler |
| Lines | 62 |
| Message-ID | <87inxbilfy.fsf@garlic.com> (permalink) |
| References | <njemf2$c9r$1@dont-email.me> <ds0i3aFc6elU48@mid.individual.net> <slrnnlnl4l.19p.mausg@Smaus.org> <i17t2d-1au.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> <slrnnlq4v9.19c.mausg@Smaus.org> <njjs2p$j0h$1@dont-email.me> <8760tefj7x.fsf@garlic.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6a701f7a2f120c3c3ec794af16136f6c"; logging-data="23382"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+dwKHguGll09M/dXnhTOVq+wKWm7XBUUI=" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:TEtRDsIVRYWkpL/T77n5vq4tdk4= sha1:+DyN1oYyFGWiGz3ls35Fam088gk= |
| Xref | csiph.com alt.folklore.computers:165125 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> writes: > Standard process going back to at least 70s-80s (in financial and gov) > is multi-party operations for sensitive operations (as countermeasure to > insider threats). After the Snowden event, I raised the issue of what > happened to multi-party operations. A few weeks later there was some > press item that the gov. was looking at (returning to?) multi-party > operations for sensitive operations. One question about not having > multi-party operation was that (also) a cost cuting move by the > gov. contractor?? re: http://manana.garlic.com/~lynn/2016d.html#68 Raspberry Pi 3? http://manana.garlic.com/~lynn/2016d.html#71 Raspberry Pi 3? DoD Expands Concerning Insider Threat Program to Contractors http://www.pogo.org/blog/2016/06/dod-expands-concerning-insider-threat-program.html While this change addresses a valid concern that classified information pertinent to our national security must be protected, the Project On Government Oversight and other good governance organizations fear it will be used to target whistleblowers. ITPs threaten whistleblowers' ability to report waste, fraud, and abuse because they do not differentiate between genuine threats and those who are acting in the interest of the public ... snip ... aka, embarrassing gov. agencies is considered a worse threat than any foreign adversaries. whistleblower posts http://manana.garlic.com/~lynn/submisc.html#whistleblower also from article In a PowerPoint presentation given by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) at their internal insider-threat webinar, titled "Simple Steps and Guidance to Secure Classified Networks," ODNI placed NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake in the same "insider threat" category as the Fort Hood and Navy Yard shooters, Nidal Hasan and Aaron Alexis. The same PowerPoint defined insider threats as "any employees and contractors who damage an entity's reputation...by exposing inside information." By this definition, there is no difference between whistleblowers who expose government wrongdoing in hopes of fixing problems, like Drake, and people wishing to do harm to national security, like Hasan and Alexis. ... snip ... aka even when following law requiring reporting to responsible congressional oversight committee and for that, was charged under the same statutes used to charge Snowden. Drake's charges were eventually dropped ... although some of the information eventually shows up in the "success of failure" series of articles http://www.govexec.com/excellence/management-matters/2007/04/the-success-of-failure/24107/ "success of failure" posts http://manana.garlic.com/~lynn/submisc.html#success.of.failure -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Raspberry Pi 3? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-10 16:30 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-06-10 11:23 -0500
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-06-10 12:36 -0400
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? artie <artie.m@gNOSPAMmail.com> - 2016-06-10 09:41 -0700
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-10 18:00 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-06-10 18:31 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-06-10 18:03 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-06-10 11:28 -0700
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-06-11 10:33 -0500
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 14:04 -0400
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-06-12 09:39 -0500
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2016-06-11 08:01 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-06-10 17:52 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-10 18:03 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-06-10 19:04 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-10 19:18 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-10 20:56 -0400
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-06-11 11:04 +0200
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-11 10:47 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 07:51 -0400
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-11 10:44 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? mausg@mail.com - 2016-06-11 10:06 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-06-11 12:50 +0200
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? mausg@mail.com - 2016-06-12 08:48 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-06-12 09:37 -0500
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-06-12 09:46 -0700
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-06-12 09:51 -0700
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-06-14 13:07 -0700
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-06-12 18:51 +0200
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 17:04 -0400
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? mausg@mail.com - 2016-06-13 08:04 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-06-13 10:00 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 12:32 -0500
csiph-web