Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #164933
| From | mausg@mail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Raspberry Pi 3? |
| Date | 2016-06-12 08:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnnlq4v9.19c.mausg@Smaus.org> (permalink) |
| References | <njemf2$c9r$1@dont-email.me> <ds0i3aFc6elU48@mid.individual.net> <slrnnlnl4l.19p.mausg@Smaus.org> <i17t2d-1au.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> |
On 2016-06-11, Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> wrote: > In article <slrnnlnl4l.19p.mausg@Smaus.org>, <mausg@mail.com> wrote: >>On 2016-06-10, Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> wrote: >>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:30:40 +0100, gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 wrote: >>> >>>> Just been perusing this and marvelling that for £35 / $35 you get a >>>> quad core 64 bit ARM architecture and aslo studying the ARM >>>> documentation for that architecture makes me wonder whether the things >>>> we discuss here should get the NG renamed to alt.pointless.nostalgia? >>>> :-) >>>> > > A single, high resolution jpeg image is rarely above 100 megabytes. This would > imply something like 4k x 4k pixels, lots of detail and a low compression factor. > > I would guess the normal porn image is way below this. (The message does not > require THAT good an image to convey). > > I do have some map scans that go to 150MB, but they are exceptions. > > Audio is from 120 k/minute (phone grade) to 40 m/minute(5.1 high resulution). > Broadcase audio is normally around 200-300 kbit/second, or 1.5 - 2 megabyte/minute. > > Video is another matter. Plain SD compressed is 4G/hour. HD can go to 15. 1k > to 40, 4k to 100G/hour. That can make a significant dent in storage. > > Half of all pictures have been taken the last 2 years. Half of all video > (in terms of resolution) has been taken the last 18 months. > > So we are at doubling rates of ~20 months. Which the bandwith growth figures > of the Internet seem to bear out; at ~44% yearly growth. > > The copper links to homes and small offices are saturated. But bring in fiber, > and you can double every 20 months for nearly a century. The national > backbones (from US to smaller nations like NO/SE) can still increase traffic > by around 100 times without laying much new fiber; and by another 5-10 with > embryoninc technology seeing the light of day right now. (like 500G colours). > I notice (yes!) that webm is getting popular in the porn area. On mine, avg about 1mg, of course, that is what I would think would be handy. One is appaled at the aamount of data swirling around. The good side is that it will swamp governments attempts to store all data. -- greymaus.eircom.ie . . ...
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Raspberry Pi 3? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-10 16:30 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-06-10 11:23 -0500
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-06-10 12:36 -0400
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? artie <artie.m@gNOSPAMmail.com> - 2016-06-10 09:41 -0700
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-10 18:00 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-06-10 18:31 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-06-10 18:03 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-06-10 11:28 -0700
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-06-11 10:33 -0500
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 14:04 -0400
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-06-12 09:39 -0500
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com> - 2016-06-11 08:01 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-06-10 17:52 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-10 18:03 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-06-10 19:04 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-10 19:18 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-10 20:56 -0400
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-06-11 11:04 +0200
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-11 10:47 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 07:51 -0400
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-11 10:44 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? mausg@mail.com - 2016-06-11 10:06 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-06-11 12:50 +0200
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? mausg@mail.com - 2016-06-12 08:48 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-06-12 09:37 -0500
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-06-12 09:46 -0700
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-06-12 09:51 -0700
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-06-14 13:07 -0700
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-06-12 18:51 +0200
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-06-12 17:04 -0400
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? mausg@mail.com - 2016-06-13 08:04 +0000
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-06-13 10:00 +0100
Re: Raspberry Pi 3? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 12:32 -0500
csiph-web