Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2670793

Re: Missing Sub

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Missing Sub
Date	2023-06-24 10:19 -0700
Organization	To protect and to server
Message-ID	<649725BC.647D@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <6494A05E.67A9@ix.netcom.com> <6494A1D8.73ED@ix.netcom.com> <6494A54B.4AA8@ix.netcom.com> <64953AB1.299D@ix.netcom.com> <6495DC0E.2D75@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

HEY, WHO WANTS TO GO ON A SPACE STATION TOUR???!?

wat can possibly go wrong?


i wanna see Captain Kirk get on it again....


(watch out for the space garbage)



at least you won't get wet...


wat wet asked the fish?


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> If you want an easy million dollars...
> 
> he charged you $250,000.00 a ticket
> 
> and he sold 4 tickets
> 
> dats a million dollars!
> 
> You are suppose to hide
> the old X-box controller..
> 
> and the fact the sub doesn't work.
> 
> (just sign here -don't read the small print)
> 
> The five passengers who boarded the doomed OceanGate Titan submersible that imploded on its way to the wreck
> of the Titanic signed an iron-clad agreement that protects the company from any liability for what could happen
> to the vessel, including death.
> 
> The three-page document spells out the risks that passengers take when riding in the 23,000-pound Titan, including
> eye-popping wording such as how the craft “has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body and may be
> constructed of materials that have not been widely used on human occupied submersible.”
> 
> https://nypost.com/2023/06/23/read-the-death-waiver-doomed-titanic-sub-tourists-signed/
> 
> no refunds.
> 
> Did Captain Kirk ever ride in dat thing?
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I'll tell you what happened...
> >
> > the
> > guys
> > at
> > the
> > top
> > knew
> > that
> > somehow
> > they
> > had
> > broken stuff,
> > the
> > guys
> > at
> > the
> > top
> > didn't
> > want
> > to
> > hear
> > that
> > they
> > had
> > broken stuff.
> >
> > They
> > didn't
> > want
> > to
> > hear
> > about
> > the
> > difficulties
> > of
> > the
> > engineers
> > -
> > the
> > fact
> > that
> > the
> > sub
> > might
> > not
> > work,
> > and
> > so
> > on.
> >
> > It's
> > better
> > if
> > they
> > don't
> > hear
> > it,
> > so
> > they
> > can
> > be
> > much
> > more
> > "honest"
> > when
> > they're
> > trying
> > to
> > sell
> > tickets.
> > -
> >
> > the
> > engineers
> > and
> > scien-
> > tists
> > on
> > the
> > one
> > hand and
> > management
> > on
> > the
> > other
> > -
> > is
> > the
> > cause
> > of
> > the
> > deterioration
> > in
> > cooperation,
> > which,
> > as
> > you've
> > seen,
> > produced
> > a calamity.
> >
> > "...the company refused to pay for the Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required  standards for these depths."
> > "...paying passengers would not be aware or informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,.."
> > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > https://fortune.com/2023/06/21/titan-titanic-missing-sub-david-lochridge-safety-concerns-sacked-oceangate-stockton-rush-hamish-harding/
> > > During the meeting, Lochridge said he discovered that the Titan’s
> > > viewport was certified to a pressure of 1,300 meters below sea level.
> > > OceanGate intended to take passengers on the Titan down to depths of
> > > 4,000 meters.
> > >
> > > According to OceanGate’s website, the Titan reaches a maximum depth of
> > > 3,800 meters (12,500 feet) on its Titanic dives.
> > >
> > > However, Lochridge alleged that the company refused to pay for the
> > > Titan’s manufacturer to build a viewport that would meet the required
> > > standards for these depths.
> > >
> > > He also said in the lawsuit that paying passengers would not be aware or
> > > informed of the Titan’s “experimental viewport design,” the lack of
> > > sufficient safety testing of the hull, or that hazardous flammable
> > > materials had been used in its construction. He said he strongly urged
> > > the company to use a classification agency like the American Bureau of
> > > Shipping to inspect and certify the Titan.
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ...maybe they banged a little too hard?
> > > >
> > > > broke the window to swim...up?
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > So, now 'they' say the passengers didn't know what happen when it
> > > > > imploded...
> > > > >
> > > > > then...what was all that BANGING they heard before?
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It doesn't have a toilet?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It uses a old Amazon cheap $30.00 video game controller? (free shipping)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why would you trust Nasa to build dat thing???
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > an Xbox contoller makes it go left?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > no fat people allowed in dat thing, right?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > don't lean on the window...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I want the names and pictures of those NASA guys who worked on dat
> > > > > > thing...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i wanna see what stupid people look like.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Trust the Science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > > and challenge
> > > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > > and challenge
> > > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > > and challenge
> > > >  the unchallengeable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge
> > >  the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
> >  the unchallengeable.
> 
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>  to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge
>  the unchallengeable.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Thread

Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 11:00 -0700
  Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 12:02 -0700
    Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 12:26 -0700
      Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 12:32 -0700
        Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 12:47 -0700
          Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 12:54 -0700
            Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 13:18 -0700
              Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 13:36 -0700
          Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 23:24 -0700
            Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 10:53 -0700
              Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 11:39 -0700
                Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 11:43 -0700
                Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 13:30 -0700
                Re: Missing Sub "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 13:38 -0700
                Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 14:04 -0700
                Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 14:16 -0700
                Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 14:40 -0700
                Re: Missing Sub "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 14:52 -0700
                Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-23 16:00 -0700
                Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-02 15:27 -0700
              Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-24 10:19 -0700
                Re: Missing Sub "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 13:56 -0700
      Re: Missing Sub -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2023-06-22 13:28 -0700
        Re: Missing Sub Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2023-06-22 16:54 -0700
          Re: Missing Sub pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2023-06-23 11:55 +0000
          Re: Missing Sub Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 09:19 -0400
        Re: Missing Sub Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 09:18 -0400
          Re: Missing Sub -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2023-06-23 08:25 -0700
            Re: Missing Sub Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> - 2023-06-23 10:40 -0700
            Re: Missing Sub -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2023-06-23 16:59 -0700
    Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 12:50 -0700
    Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 23:10 -0700
      Re: Missing Sub Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2023-06-23 16:15 +1000
        Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-06-22 23:43 -0700
    Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-02 18:55 -0700
      Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-03 10:24 -0700
        Re: Missing Sub The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-07-03 14:40 -0700
  Re: Missing Sub Yak <Yak@inbox.com> - 2023-06-22 15:39 -0400
    Re: Missing Sub Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2023-06-23 02:09 +0000
      Re: Missing Sub Yak <Yak@inbox.com> - 2023-06-23 08:34 -0400
        Re: Missing Sub -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2023-06-23 05:50 -0700
          Re: Missing Sub Yak <Yak@inbox.com> - 2023-06-23 08:59 -0400
            Re: Missing Sub -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2023-06-23 08:23 -0700
            Re: Missing Sub David Hartung <shitbag.hartung@shitbags.r.us> - 2023-06-23 10:40 -0700
        Re: Missing Sub Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2023-06-23 13:02 +0000
          Re: Missing Sub Yak <Yak@inbox.com> - 2023-06-23 09:34 -0400
            Re: Missing Sub Lou Bricano <lb@cap.con> - 2023-06-23 10:39 -0700
            Re: Missing Sub Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 19:48 -0400
              Re: Missing Sub Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2023-06-23 17:30 -0700
                Re: Missing Sub Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> - 2023-06-24 00:38 +0000
                Re: Missing Sub Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> - 2023-06-24 01:44 +0000
                Re: Missing Sub Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com> - 2023-06-24 01:59 +0000
                Re: Missing Sub Robert Youngdale <another.jaques@idiot> - 2023-06-23 19:03 -0700
  Re: Missing Sub "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-22 13:10 -0700
    Re: Missing Sub Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2023-06-22 17:04 -0700

csiph-web