Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.evolution > #1041

Re: Why would science pretend that evolution is true if it isn't?

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Why,  ?
AN exceedingly stupid question.  Same as why does one go to work for the 
government?  $$$  Same as why does the government hide the truths of
true religion of the true Catholic Church from stupid people.  Same as 
when they crucified Christ.  $$$   Greed is always the answer. Judas and 
his silver.  And always, Greed is full of sin...

EXAMPLE;  its not the pollution that has caused the warming on earth.
That is just the excuse political s use to make their money with.
When in fact, its the space junk in orbit, pulling on the gravitational 
fields of the earth in lopsidedness.

8On 10/31/2016 11:11 AM, W.T.S., ghq3The Lamp of Golden Truth!* wrote:
> "Andrew"<andrew.321remov@usa.net>  wrote in
> news:FNCdnQ8ydemc14rFnZ2dnUU7-RHNnZ2d@earthlink.com:
>
>> "Cloud Hobbit" wrote in message
>> news:b3854d15-bba4-4eaf-a425-bab45644ce01@googlegroups.com...
>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>> "Cloud Hobbit" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> WELL? WHAT REASON WOULD THE ENTIRE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY
>>>>> HAVE FOR SAYING EVOLUTION IS TRUE IS IT IS NOT?
>>>>
>>>> Good question.
>>>>
>>>> A lot has to do with how the word is defined.
>>>
>>> The definition referring to the theory credited to Charles Darwin.
>>
>> There are meanings attributed to the word that do not go that far.
>>
>> So one may say they believe in evolution, but not in the common
>> descent idea as expressed by Darwin.
>>
>>>> But you are correct, the "goo to you" story is
>>>> a clever fantasy that has deceived the gullible
>>>> masses.
>>>
>>> Are you referring to the fact that the evidence says we all have a
>>> common ancestor?
>>
>> The evidence may be interpreted that way, but that would be an
>> incorrect interpretation.
>>
>>> Now, why do people think that Darwin's theory of evolution
>>> through natural selection is part of a giant hoax perpetrated
>>> by the entire scientific community, to keep us from knowing
>>> that the theory and the evidence from 150 years and the spinoff
>>> technologies are all fake?
>>>
>>> It should be noted that it is only an infinitesimally small
>>> number of people who think Darwin's theory is a hoax.
>>
>> It is true that the gullible masses have been deceived,
>> but those who value the truth can see the falsehood.
> Have a dose of the truth, Andrew86:
>
>   <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District>
>
>          <http://tinyurl.com/bmxa4rc>
>
>     <https://sphericalbullshit.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/what-i-would-say-t
>     o-creationists-if-i-was-more-of-a-dick/>
>
>         <http://tinyurl.com/zascach>
>
>     <http://americanloons.blogspot.com/search?q=stephen+myers>
>
>           <http://tinyurl.com/zlcp8u9>
>
>     <http://americanloons.blogspot.com/search?q=Lee+Strobel%27s>
>
>           <http://tinyurl.com/zbl54ww>
>
>    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjFgcOId-ZY>
>
>           <http://tinyurl.com/j9nkey5>
>
>    <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6360/>
>
>          <http://tinyurl.com/zvyyhxn>
>
>     <http://listverse.com/2011/11/19/8-examples-of-evolution-in-action/>
>
>           <http://tinyurl.com/c72j7wv>
>
>     <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_replication>
>
>           <http://tinyurl.com/goxgec9>
>
>     <https://edthemanicstreetpreacher.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/dawkins-ber
>     linski/>
>
>           <http://tinyurl.com/zmv3xf2>
>
>    <https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/06/22-answe
>    rs-creationism-evolution-bill-nye-ken-ham-debate>
>
>          <http://tinyurl.com/hwjf83d>
>
>    <http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/dumb-things-creationists-
>    say/>
>
>          <http://tinyurl.com/zq9wt5k>
>
>    <http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/magazine/unintelligent-design.html?_
>    r=0>
>
>          <http://tinyurl.com/h7ubjta>
>
>    <http://www.eoht.info/page/Creationism+scientists+ranked+by+idiocy>
>
>         <http://tinyurl.com/h5y2gao>
>
>     <https://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/18-creationist-arguments-debun
>     ked>
>
>           <http://tinyurl.com/zb7sfyr>
>
>      <http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Category:Creationism>
>
>            <http://tinyurl.com/zt8dycq>
>
>     <https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jan/28/creation-origin-life-fu
>     ture-adam-rutherford-review>
>
>           <http://tinyurl.com/hsj6u6y>
>
>    <http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/07/what-do-physicists-t
>    hink-of-michio-kaku/>
>
>          <http://tinyurl.com/j32bskg>
>
>    <http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/howscienceworks_16>
>
>          <http://tinyurl.com/3p4e7mx>
>
>    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin>
>
>          <http://tinyurl.com/jyzjfar>
>
>    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel>
>
>          <http://tinyurl.com/pcqylyj>
>
>    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution>
>
>          <http://tinyurl.com/7vw8ozk>
>
>   <http://www.famousscientists.org/charles-darwin/>
>
>         <http://tinyurl.com/jpr7p5v>
>
>    <http://darwin-online.org.uk/biography.html>
>
>          <http://tinyurl.com/5p6znj>
>
>         "Creation science" has not entered the curriculum for a reason so
>   simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is
>   false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false.
>   What could be more destructive of that most fragile yet most precious
>   commodity in our entire intellectual heritage -- good teaching -- than
>   a bill forcing honourable teachers to sully their sacred trust by
>   granting equal treatment to a doctrine not only known to be false, but
>   calculated to undermine any general understanding of science as an
>   enterprise? - Stephen Jay Gould.
>
>    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Jay_Gould>
>
>          <http://tinyurl.com/jc3ckub>
>
>     <http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-human-evolution>
>
>           <http://tinyurl.com/jsalxfe>
>
>      <http://americanloons.blogspot.com/search?q=macarthur>
>
>            <http://tinyurl.com/jenrqkq>
>
>      <http://www.annualreviews.org/journal/ecolsys>
>
>            <http://tinyurl.com/z8o6zan>
>
>       <http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/home>
>
>             <http://tinyurl.com/pwg6fak>
>
>        <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ibEaIPtMk>
>
>             <http://tinyurl.com/hy7xymb>
>
>        <http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Falldidit#Falldidit>
>
>              <http://tinyurl.com/z4z77ra>

Back to alt.evolution | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why would science pretend that evolution is true if it isn't? "W.T.S., ghq3The Lamp of Golden Truth!*" <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 13:11 -0500
  Re: Why would science pretend that evolution is true if it isn't? tesla sTinker <truecatholicstaff@truecarpentry.org> - 2016-12-10 12:25 -0800
    Re: Why would science pretend that evolution is true if it isn't? Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-12-10 15:45 -0800
    Re: Why would science pretend that evolution is true if it isn't? Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-12-12 02:45 +0000

csiph-web