Groups > alt.engineering.electrical > #18207

Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters?

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt, alt.engineering.electrical, sci.electronics.basics
Subject	Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters?
Date	Tue, 23 Jun 2026 10:20:14 -0600
Lines	29
Message-ID	<n9vq27Fbfu7U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<1113i2e$3c8no$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> <1118c3c$n0e1$2@dont-email.me> <111dvvv$29056$1@toylet.eternal-september.org>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net auUBBCmN9JHSdmrbqWqOtwp0HNn/stLmMpnTu141XnV0T/2upz
Cancel-Lock	sha1:HIHjaeZzFNhsJIf+kizaZGhofao= sha256:cG4krPcSHC4gwNGsofUEESy6fwDzZV4w6W90dN1JXSo=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.23
In-Reply-To	<111dvvv$29056$1@toylet.eternal-september.org>
Xref	csiph.com alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:44380 alt.engineering.electrical:18207 sci.electronics.basics:54893

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> On 6/21/2026 5:49 PM, Woozy Song wrote:
>> Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>>>
>>> Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft as they got thinner and 
>>> narrower?
>>>
>>
>> more vulnerable to cosmic rays, so chips used in outer space are still
>> running lithography of 100 nm or so
> 
> 
> Space objects usually have shielding against all kinds of radiations, 
> unless... UNLESS.... you just can't. The farther away from the Earth, 
> the lower the sheilding effect??? But BUT....
> 
> I wanna talk about witchcraft against wafers. Can tin foil do it? ;)
> 
> 
It's not really witchcraft like made out to be. Lasting technology uses 
closer to 200nm today. You can even fit a toad's eye in between it, so 
this is nothing shocking. Look elsewhere for magic, young Jedi. You will 
find it in the summer of 2026.

-- 
We eat the night, we drink the time
Make our dreams come true
And hungry eyes are passing by
On streets we call the zoo

Thread

Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-19 22:00 +0800
  Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-19 16:00 -0400
    Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-19 18:40 -0600
      Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-20 02:40 -0400
    Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-20 11:49 +0800
      Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-20 02:48 -0400
        Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-20 18:17 +0800
        Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-20 19:48 +0800
          Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-20 10:48 -0400
            Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-21 10:24 +0800
          Re: Are chips ... tilling pattern? magical seals? Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2026-06-20 20:14 +0200
            Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke?? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-21 10:18 +0800
              Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke?? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-21 06:34 -0400
                Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke?? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-21 19:34 +0800
                Re: Are chips ... electronics runs on magic smoke?? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-06-22 01:53 -0400
                Re: Are chips ... electronics dies & releaas "magic smoke"?? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-22 14:09 +0800
  Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? Woozy Song <suzyw0ng@outlook.com> - 2026-06-21 17:49 +0800
    Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-23 20:59 +0800
      Re: Are chips more vulnerable to witchcraft than transisters? phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-06-23 10:20 -0600
        Re: Are chips more vulnerable to ... the Force? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-24 00:28 +0800
          Re: Are chips more vulnerable to ... the Force? pitter_smith <70620b9261c622c2c6443cb36988dd78336be458fd9f13499dd358523b105d91@example.com> - 2026-07-05 04:30 +0000
            Re: Are chips more vulnerable to ... the Force? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-07-05 13:00 +0800

csiph-web