Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #335

Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Torsten Villnow <t.villnow@gmail.com>
Newsgroups alt.comp.software.thunderbird
Subject Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20
Date Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:48:23 +0200
Lines 17
Message-ID <ieseppFjag3U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <s6al8b$di4$11@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Trace individual.net 3Gtlb/bNE7DD0N/5dNKEzQibOj0TrO9aTgK9KdxYB1vue6mjbb
Cancel-Lock sha1:O4MYZpCG5WdidTFLEZmmVYuev60=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
In-Reply-To <s6al8b$di4$11@dont-email.me>
Content-Language en-GB
Xref csiph.com alt.comp.software.thunderbird:335

Show key headers only | View raw

Am 28.04.2021 um 05:36 schrieb Michael Trew:
> I'm currently using Thunderbird 3.1.20 - have been for years.  I use it 
> as my primary e-mail client for 3 accounts as well as Eternal September 
> Usenet.  Some people have harassed me that it's not secure or safe to 
> use, but it seems to still work fine for me.  Is there any significant 
> risk to continue using this version?  Regular updates are annoying, and 
> I quite honestly prefer the interface to this version.  I did not like 
> the look of version 5 when it came out.

Who knows, which and how many security flaws have been fixed since 2014? 
I won't use such an old program which regularly connects to and 
downloads data from the internet, even if appropriate caution is exercised.

And when it comes to new looks, adaption keeps me mentally flexible :-).

-- 
Torsten Villnow

Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-04-27 23:36 -0400
  Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Torsten Villnow <t.villnow@gmail.com> - 2021-04-28 08:48 +0200
    Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Wilf <wilf@postingx.uk> - 2021-04-28 17:39 +0100
  Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Teddy-Bears <Bears@invalid.com> - 2021-04-28 07:39 -0400
    Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Whiton <kenwhiton@surfglobal.net.INVAL> - 2021-04-30 22:53 -0400
      Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-05-01 17:41 -0400
        Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Whiton <kenwhiton@surfglobal.net.INVAL> - 2021-05-03 00:06 -0400
    Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Miguel Tomar Nogueira <mnogueira@mail.telepac.pt> - 2021-05-09 22:39 +0000
      Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-05-10 07:36 -0700
        Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2021-05-10 10:25 -0700
          Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-05-10 13:43 -0400
          Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-05-10 10:43 -0700
          Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-05-11 11:32 -0400
            Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-05-11 09:19 -0700
              Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-05-11 12:59 -0400
            Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-05-11 13:11 -0400
              Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-05-13 01:03 -0400
  Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-28 11:58 +0000
    Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 Michael Trew <mt999999@ymail.com> - 2021-04-28 13:59 -0400
  Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-28 08:19 -0400
  Re: Thunderbird 3.1.20 "David E. Ross" <not_me@not_there.invalid> - 2021-04-28 08:24 -0700

csiph-web